Back
RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI
Deepak Kumar Lodhi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal has been filed by present appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.10.2023 passed by the Sessions Judge, District Jabalpur (M.P.), in ST No.629/2019 whereby appellant has been convicted for the offence under section 307 of IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years R.I. with fine of Rs.50,000/- with default stipulations.
2. As per prosecution story, on 16.2.2019 at night about 12.30 P.M. complainant Dinesh Lodhi was standing near his house with his cousing brother Abhishek Lodhi. At that time his uncle Deepak Lodhi came and told Abhishek Lodhi that why don't you play his DJ. Then complainant told to Deepak that it is his choice to place DJ of whoever he wants. On this, accused Deepak Lodhi abused. When complainant Dinesh forbade the accused to abuse him, thereupon accused Deepak with an intention to kill complainant, stabbed him twice by means of knife on his left side of abdomen and on right waist, owing to which blood oozed out. Injured was taken to hospital. FIR was lodged. After investigation, charge sheet was filed under sections 294 and 307 of IPC.
3. Appellant abjured his guilt and claimed to be tried. After recording the statements of prosecutio
The compromise between the parties can be considered for the reduction of sentence, even in non-compoundable cases, based on the principles established in previous judgments.
Rioting and attempt to commit culpable homicidal - Quash of Criminal proceedings - Compromise between parties - where there is a genuine compromise and there is hardly any likelihood of the offender ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
