Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The Supreme Court and High Courts are actively issuing decisions and scheduling hearings in 2026, reflecting ongoing judicial engagement with issues pertaining to justice for marginalized groups, land disputes, and criminal appeals involving the SC/ST Act.
Main Points & Insights:
Cases involving live-in relationships and minors are also scheduled for judgment, reflecting the courts' attention to social issues and rights of individuals ["2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2806"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In recent legal developments, a pivotal judgment has reshaped the interpretation of the (). Commonly searched as justice pardi wala decision in sc st act, this ruling underscores the balance between protecting marginalized communities and upholding . Delivered in , the decision in the Justice Pardi Wala case addresses critical issues like arrests, investigations, and judicial directions under the Act.
This blog post breaks down the main findings, key points, and implications, drawing from authoritative sources. Whether you're a legal professional, affected individual, or simply interested in , understanding this ruling is crucial amid ongoing debates on the Act's implementation. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.
The 's decision emphasizes that the is designed to protect members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes from atrocities and must be interpreted in accordance with . [
#SCSTAct #SupremeCourtRuling #LegalUpdate
Manaw Pardi @ Inder Pardi S/o Kardhani Pardi, R/o 1. ... JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI Judgment / Order (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2026 ... Sheshna Pardi S/o Bapji, R/o Village Sewada, Police p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:160pt;left:159pt
SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 15.01.2026 1. ... That it is submitted that the total land measuring 25.2 sqm. was acquired in the property No. 6788 Beri Wala bagh and the whole compensation of this property has been deposited in the Hon'ble ADJ court u/s 30-31 of LA Act. ... List on 12th March, 2026. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J MADHU JAIN, J JANUARY 15, 2026 kk/msh ... That property no. 6788 belonging to the petitioner- Mr.Pavinder Grover wasneithernotified under Section 4 & 6 of the....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.02.2026 MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : ... JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Ms. Sundeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Varsha Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, Asst. A.G. Punjab. ... BHARDWAJ) FEBRUARY 10, 2026 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No ... The Registry is directed to send a copy of th....
JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order 06/01/2026 1. ... [2026:RJ-JD:263] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 20/2026 1. ... Kiran Devi D/o Hari Ram, Aged About 19 Years, 1349 Chawani Wala Dhoda Anandpur Kalu Widh Chak Tehasil Jaitaran Die Beawar At Village Kurdaya Tehsil Merta Nagaur Raj. 2. ... As per the pleadings, the petitioners claim to be majors and of marriageable age and assert that they are living together in live-in-relationship and have exectuted an agree....
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 19/01/2026 izkFkhZ&vfHkqDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur grs q ;s i`Fkd&i`Fkd~ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lfa ... [2026:RJ-JD:3172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. ... Ashmeet Singh S/o Manjeet Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Hanumangarh) 2. ... Manjeet Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/ O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And D....
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 19/01/2026 izkFkhZ&vfHkqDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur grs q ;s i`Fkd&i`Fkd~ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lfa ... [2026:RJ-JD:3172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. ... Ashmeet Singh S/o Manjeet Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Hanumangarh) 2. ... Manjeet Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/ O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And D....
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 19/01/2026 izkFkhZ&vfHkqDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur grs q ;s i`Fkd&i`Fkd~ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lfa ... [2026:RJ-JD:3172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. ... Ashmeet Singh S/o Manjeet Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Hanumangarh) 2. ... Manjeet Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/ O Chack Jwala Singh Wala Tehsil And D....
CIT(A)”] dated 03.12.2024, under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [in short “the Act”] for the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Notice u/s 148 has been issued on 21.03.2018 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. ... DR Date of Pronouncement 19.01.2026 O R D2 E3 R.0 1.2026 PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. ... No. 204/SRT/2025 Jayveersingh Jashubhai Chudasama, L/h Divyaben Jayveersingh Chudasama, 34, Jalaram Nagar Swadhyayamandal Road, ....
JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 13/01/2026 1. Issue notice of petition and stay application as well. 2. ... Dalji S/o Wala Yadav, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Ambedkar Colony Patela Dungarpur Ps Kotwali District Dungarpur Rajasthan 8. ... Manu Yadav S/o Wala Yadav, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Ambedkar Colony Patela Dungarpur Police Station Police Station District Dungarpur Rajasthan 17. ... No. 159/2026 Yadavbasti Geji Police Station Chaurasi District Dungarpur Rajasthan 2. Vimal Prakash S/o Homa Yadav, Aged Ab....
JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL Order 03/02/2026 1. ... Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 55/2026 Mangal Singh S/o Shankar Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ulpura Nadi Wala Police Station Nathdwara District Rajsamand (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Rajsamand) ----Appellant Versus 1. ... order dated 28.01.2026. ... Offences alleged in the FIR 121(1), 132, 115(2), 191(2) of BNS and 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 5. Offences added, if any 121(1), 132, 3(5) of BNS; 3(2)(va) of ....
Bail No.118/2019 (Sessions Case No.09/2019) is set aside. 7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and the order dated 27.03.2019 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Churu in Criminal Misc. It is directed that appellants - (1) Dinesh Kumar @ Dhanesh S/o Bhagvana Ram (2) Shrawan Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.67/2018 of Police Station Ratan Nagar, District Churu provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum o....
Act did not further provide to give the said Act, overriding effect vis-à-vis laws operating at that time, clearly shows that the overriding effect given by the non obstante clause introduced in the POCSO Act vide Act No. 13 of 2013, was legislatively intended to prevail over the SC/ST Act. The fact that SC/ST Amendment Act, while amending the SC/ST This clearly shows that the legislature has enacted it, intending to give it overriding effect vis-à-vis the SC/ST Act.
He contends that, as is evident from clause-10 of the circular, it is retrospective in its operation. According to him, the Government of India issued Circular No.21/15 dated 10th December 2015 deciding, as a matter of policy, not to file appeals/SLP's in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the limit given in the said circular. 9. Per contra, Mr. Pardi Wala, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent-assessee has, to begin with, raised a technical plea concerning the maintainability of the appeals.
He has also pointed out that in the policy it was specifically mentioned that "in case of dishonor of premium cheque(s) the Company shall not be liable under the policy and the policy shall be void-ab-initio (from inception)." In support of his submission, he has referred to Section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938 (for short, the Act 1938') and also relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Deokar Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd., 2009 AIR (SC) 2026.
7. The decision in Gangula Ashok v. State of Andhra Pradesh was in the context of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (`SC/ST Act?). There is no provision in the SC/ST Act similar to either Section 151 or Section 154 (3) of the Electricity Act. The scheme of SC & ST Act is distinct from the scheme of the Electricity Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
