SupremeToday Landscape Ad
AI Thinking

AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!

Scanned Judgements…!


AI Overview

AI Overview...

Case Laws and Main Points for Closed Fracture of Right Ulnar Styloid

  • Compensation Awards for Ulnar Styloid Fractures Several cases have awarded damages for closed ulnar styloid fractures, often in conjunction with distal radius fractures. Notably, Soong Chee Kian & Satu Lagi ["2016"] 2 PIR 59 awarded RM20,000 for fracture of the right ulnar styloid, and Teh Poh Choon ["2012"] 1 PIR 74 granted RM25,000 for closed fracture at the distal end of the left radius and ulnar styloid, indicating a recognized standard for such injuries. Similarly, the case involving the appellant with bilateral fractures awarded RM33,000, including damages for left ulna styloid injury [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_PILRU_2018_PILRU_67).

  • Legal Recognition of Ulnar Styloid Fractures The courts acknowledge ulnar styloid fractures as significant injuries, often linked with other wrist fractures, and have awarded damages accordingly. For example, in Chong Kiat Mian v. ["unspecified"], the injury was considered more serious than similar cases, and damages of RM17,000 were awarded for a styloid fracture ["MOHAMED ZAIN IBRAHIM DAN YANG LAIN-LAIN LAGI LWN. ASIAN RENT A CAR SDN BHD DAN LAGI SATU - Sessions Court"]. In another case, an award of RM40,000 was granted for fracture of the distal end of left radius with associated ulnar styloid injury, emphasizing the injury's impact ["Samsuri Lajis v. Mohd Asrul Mahmod [2010"]].

  • Injury Severity and Disability Assessments Cases such as the one involving the appellant with bilateral radius and ulnar styloid fractures illustrate that these injuries can lead to permanent disability, muscle wasting, and movement limitations. Awards ranged from RM18,000 to RM33,000, depending on severity and associated disabilities ["ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala"], ["ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala"], [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_PILRU_2018_PILRU_67).

  • Relevance of Medical Evidence Medical reports consistently confirm the nature of the fractures and their consequences, supporting the awards and legal recognition of the injury's seriousness. The injuries often include wrist dislocation, radial and ulnar styloid fractures, and associated disabilities such as limited movement and muscle wasting.

Analysis and Conclusion

  • Legal precedents establish that closed fractures of the right ulnar styloid are recognized injuries warranting compensation, with awards typically ranging from RM17,000 to RM40,000 depending on severity and disability.
  • The injuries are often associated with distal radius fractures, and courts consider the extent of disability, muscle wasting, and movement restrictions when awarding damages.
  • Medical documentation and expert opinions play a crucial role in substantiating the injury's impact and determining appropriate compensation.

References:["VASANTHI BALAKRISNAN LWN. SUNWAY MEDICAL CENTRE SDN BHD & SATU LAGI - High Court"] ["R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714"] ["Samsuri Lajis v. Mohd Asrul Mahmod [2010"]] [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_PILRU_2018_PILRU_67) ["ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala"] ["ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala"]

Ulnar Styloid Fracture Cases: Damages Awards in Malaysian Courts

If you've sustained a closed fracture of the right ulnar styloid in an accident, you might be wondering: Please provide me case laws for closed fracture of right ulnar styloid. This common wrist injury often arises in personal injury claims, particularly negligence cases from road accidents or falls. Malaysian courts typically assess damages based on precedents, medical evidence, and injury severity. While no single case directly mirrors every scenario, judicial opinions offer clear guidance on compensation ranges—generally from RM20,000 to RM36,000 for similar fractures. This post analyzes key cases, legal principles, and comparable awards to help you understand potential outcomes. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.

Background on Ulnar Styloid Fractures in Legal Disputes

Ulnar styloid fractures involve the bony projection at the end of the ulna bone near the wrist, often linked to distal radius fractures from trauma like falls or collisions. In personal injury litigation, plaintiffs seek damages for pain, suffering, medical costs, and loss of earning capacity. Courts emphasize:- Precedent-based assessment: Awards align with prior similar cases.- Anatomical factors: Proximity to the radius influences whether damages are combined or separate.- Medical evidence: Lack of proof for heightened severity keeps awards within standard ranges. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

Malaysian courts frequently reference the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards for wrist and forearm injuries, ensuring consistency. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

Key Malaysian Case Laws on Damages Awards

Chong Kiat Mian v. Tan Kuan She & 2 Ors 2021 1 PIR 46

In this landmark case, the court awarded RM36,000 for fractures at the lower ends of the radius and ulnar styloid. This sets a high-end benchmark for closed fractures with associated wrist trauma. AINI ABDULLAH vs NATHAN ATHIMOOLAM - 2023 MarsdenLR 1633

Woon Kim Leong v. Muniandy Gopal 2019 2 PIR 40

Here, RM20,000 was granted for an open fracture of the distal third of the radius/ulna. Though slightly more severe due to being open, it provides a baseline for closed variants. Courts noted the current claim's proposed RM18,000 global sum was reasonable absent evidence of greater severity. AINI ABDULLAH vs NATHAN ATHIMOOLAM - 2023 MarsdenLR 1633

Insights from R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

The court recommended damages between RM21,500 and RM36,000 for anatomically close injuries like ulnar styloid and distal radius fractures, citing the Compendium. The proximity of the ulnar styloid and distal radius is significant in damages assessment. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

In cases of adjacent bone injuries, consolidated lump-sum awards are preferred to reflect overall impact, as seen in Kim Lin Chan v. Lee Hua Sing, where individual sums were considered but combined in practice. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

Comparative Cases from Additional Sources

Broader precedents reinforce these ranges, particularly where ulnar styloid fractures accompany other wrist injuries:

International insights from Indian courts (analogous in common law principles) show similar approaches:- ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala_HC_KLHC010260192005: For trans-scaphoid perilunar dislocation with radial and ulnar styloid fractures, the court assessed 6% earning capacity reduction, emphasizing compensation for pain and loss. ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - 2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43813- ANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - Kerala_HC_KLHC010242952004: Fracture right ulnar styloid alongside leg fractures led to enhanced awards for disabilities, stressing fair reflection of actual earnings. SHIJU P.V. Vs PAUL N.X. - 2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42394- HAREESH T. A. VS SANTHOSHKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Ker) 911: Fracture of radial and ulnar styloid with plaster treatment warranted higher loss-of-earnings compensation beyond Rs.3,000, underscoring inadequate initial awards. HAREESH T. A. VS SANTHOSHKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Ker) 911- ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS R. SHIVAKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 188: Severe case with fracture Radial Styloid and Ulnar Styloid resulted in 41.5% whole-body disability; compensation enhanced to Rs.21,68,600, including Rs.1,50,000 for pain. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS R. SHIVAKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 188- Miss Kumud Pagi VS Gurudas Shet Gaonkar - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 962: Compound ulnar styloid fracture yielded Rs.40,000 for pain, with 23% disability. Miss Kumud Pagi VS Gurudas Shet Gaonkar - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 962- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Teekaam Chand Jain - 2011 Supreme(Raj) 418 and Yadava Kumar VS The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - 2010 Supreme(SC) 808: Bilateral radius/ulnar styloid fractures caused 20-33% upper limb disability, preventing work like painting; awards included future earnings loss using multipliers. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Teekaam Chand Jain - 2011 Supreme(Raj) 418Yadava Kumar VS The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Samsuri Lajis v. Mohd Asrul Mahmod [2010 Supreme(SC) 808

These cases illustrate courts' tendency to award higher for functional impairment, often 20-40% of affected limbs translating to whole-body percentages.

Legal Principles Guiding Awards

  1. Precedent Reliance: Courts calibrate to comparables; e.g., no evidence of superior severity to Chong Kiat Mian justifies RM18,000-RM36,000. AINI ABDULLAH vs NATHAN ATHIMOOLAM - 2023 MarsdenLR 1633
  2. Anatomical Proximity: Close wrist bones warrant higher combined sums. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714
  3. Medical Evidence Role: Essential for deviating from norms; absence aligns with precedents. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714
  4. Separate vs. Global Awards: Interconnected injuries favor lumps, per Kim Lin Chan. R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714

Bullet-point takeaways:- Use Compendium for ranges.- Factor liability shares (e.g., 50-50 in collisions). MOHAMAD AZHAR YUSSOH vs MOHAMAD HAIRUL ALHAFIZ ZAN IMI & ANOR- Include pain, medicals, future loss where disability proven.

Factors Influencing Your Claim

Typically, plaintiffs propose globals like RM18,000, adjusted by courts. Always document everything.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Malaysian courts consistently award RM20,000-RM36,000 for ulnar styloid fractures, guided by precedents like Chong Kiat MianAINI ABDULLAH vs NATHAN ATHIMOOLAM - 2023 MarsdenLR 1633 and anatomical principles R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714. Additional cases affirm focus on disability and fairness MOHAMAD AZHAR YUSSOH vs MOHAMAD HAIRUL ALHAFIZ ZAN IMI & ANOR. If pursuing a claim, gather strong medical proof to argue for the upper range.

Key Takeaways:- Benchmark: RM18,000-RM36,000 globals common.- Precedents drive decisions; cite them.- Proximity and evidence matter most.

For tailored advice, contact a personal injury specialist. Stay safe on the roads!

Sources: AINI ABDULLAH vs NATHAN ATHIMOOLAM - 2023 MarsdenLR 1633R VEERASINGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ZAMZURI JAIS & SATU LAGI - 2022 MarsdenLR 1714MOHAMAD AZHAR YUSSOH vs MOHAMAD HAIRUL ALHAFIZ ZAN IMI & ANORANTO THOMAS vs SATHISH BABU - 2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43813SHIJU P.V. Vs PAUL N.X. - 2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42394HAREESH T. A. VS SANTHOSHKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Ker) 911ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS R. SHIVAKUMAR - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 188Miss Kumud Pagi VS Gurudas Shet Gaonkar - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 962Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Teekaam Chand Jain - 2011 Supreme(Raj) 418Yadava Kumar VS The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Samsuri Lajis v. Mohd Asrul Mahmod [2010 Supreme(SC) 808

#UlnarStyloidFracture, #PersonalInjuryLaw, #MalaysiaDamages
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top