Does UP Public Moneys Act Cover Supply Agreements?

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 313

In the present case, the dominant nature of the transaction is supply of water, which is outside the purview of a service under the Finance Act, 1994. Further, even the provisions of Orissa Irrigation Act as well as the rules signify the provisions as regards supply of water and not otherwise. ... We find that the short issue involved in the matter is that whether Service Tax can be levied on water charges paid by the appellant to Government of Odisha for supply of wa....

1961 0 Supreme(AP) 111

It must be mentioned at the outset that the payment payable by a landholder comes within the connotation of land revenue under section 2 (2 ). In view of this definition, it is difficult to postulate that peshkush payable by a landholder falls outside the purview of the Act. ... ... ( 7 ) THE first question that falls for decision is whether the payment made by the landholder of an estate within the meaning of the Madras Estates Land Act is #HL_STAR....

2021 0 Supreme(AP) 1044

the Act? ... Except that no category of commercial transaction is excluded from the purview of the above said Act which is evident from the reading of the above said section and its clauses. 21. ... In view of the above said rival contentions and averments of both the parties in the above said IA, the court below framed a point for consideration to the effect that whether the dispute between the parties is a commercial dispute within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)(vi) of the Act? ... 10.2 Water #HL_STA....

1962 Supreme(Online)(All) 15

Their Lordships observed that; a yearly impost laid upon real property by parliamentary enactment for the provision of public revenue appears to be within the description of land tax. It was further held that the Bridge Tax being a tax on land directly imposed by the Legislature is a land tax. ... The fact that water tax under the Municipalities Act is in reality a tax on land and buildings finds further support from the provisions of cl.(a) of S.129 of the Act. ... L....

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 505

In our opinion, part does not necessarily mean a substantial part, and that it would be open to the Court in every case which comes up before it to examine whether the contribution made by the State satisfies the requirement of law." ... Generally the executive would be the best judge to determine whether or not the impugned purpose is a public purpose. Yet it is not beyond the purview of judicial scrutiny. The interest of a section of the society may be public purpose when it is benefited by the acquisition. ... the Guj....

1997 Supreme(Online)(SC) 77

Indisputably, the title of the Act as well as the charging S.3 employ the words "duty on supply of electricity". ... land revenue'. ... It is also necessary that in deciding whether any particular enactment is within the purview of one legislature or the other, it is the pith and substance of the legislation in question that has to be looked into. ... The levy as land cess can be used by operation of S.70 read with S.20 and the definition of the word 'land#H....

2012 0 Supreme(Ori) 350

Bharasa Hatchery-opposite party No.2 has executed an agreement on 18.12.2010 for supply of power for a load of 15.00 KW to his Hatchery unit. ... On the rival contentions of the parties, the only question that falls for consideration by this Court is as to whether the “hatchery” comes under “poultry” farming which is covered under Regulation 80(5) ... (ii) i.e. allied agricultural activities. ... Referring to the order dated 27.1.2010 passed by the OERC in Case No.127 of 2009 it is submitted that the hatchery unit #HL_S....

High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

A land owner who has erected a building on his land contrary to the law ought not to receive any benefit from it from an acquiring authority under the Act." (iii) I have dealt with this area of jurisprudence in the case of Hatara (M) Sdn Bhd v. ... This petition is, as if an entire set of complaints, whether or not they fall within the purview of s 181, have all been hurled into the Court with the duty foisted on the Court to pick and choose to allow the petition. ... their actions as well as the #HL_ST....

A land owner who has erected a building on his land contrary to the law ought not to receive any benefit from it from an acquiring authority under the Act." (iii) I have dealt with this area of jurisprudence in the case of Hatara (M) Sdn Bhd v. ... (e) Whether the First Defendant had breached its obligations under the Agreement. ... mechanism in the agreement before terminating the agreement; (vii) the agreement required phones as well as phone boot....

Madras High Court

Kendriya Bhandar, Central Revenue Quarters, acted upon and any interference by this Court, at this stage, would go against publc ... In this regard, he referred to Section 10(1) of Tamil Nadu (Transparency in Tenders) Act, 1998 stating that in Chennai, the basic rate of S Grade Sugar per MT is Rs.39100, counsel for the appellant by placing reliance on Sections 10(1) and (3) of Tamil Nadu (Transparency in Tenders) Act

2014 0 Supreme(All) 2874

The relevant portion of Section 34 of UP Land Revenue Act read as follows: - (1) Every person obtaining possession of any land by succession or transfer (other than a succession or transfer which has already been recorded under Section 33 -A), shall report such succession or transfer to Tahsildar of the Tahsil in which the land is situated. A perusal of the application as well as order passed on 25.4.2007 shows that the Naib Tahsildar has initiated the proceedings under Section 34 of UP Land Revenue Act.

2007 0 Supreme(Mad) 2557

The Forest land comes under the purview of Section 9 of the Act. Therefore, there were Ryotwari Settlement was introduced in the Janmam Lands under section 8,9 and 10 of the said Act. But the above estates have also violated the provisions of the said Central Act. The Ryotwari patta for the settlement has to be taken into account on the application made by the petitioners concerned.

2003 6 Supreme 1011

The contravention of sub-section (1) is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or fine or both as provided for in sub-section (2) of Section 17. The question is whether the agreement Exhibit B-16 comes within the purview of Section 17(1) of the Act. The recital in Exhibit B-16 does not show any payment was either made or agreed to be made by the appellant/plaintiff to the first defendant. It cannot be construed as an agreement whereby any payment was made or agreed to be made by the appellant/plaintiff to defendant No.1.

2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 8

5) What would be the purchase price of the suit land and in how many instalments it should be made payable. 2) Whether the holding of the tenant including the acreage of the suit land is below ceiling limit. 3) Whether there is agreement to raise sugarcane in the suit land and whether it comes under the purview of section 43-A of the Act. 4) Whether the tenant is entitled to purchase the suit land and if so to what extent.

1998 0 Supreme(Del) 503

(2) The rights of the company in respect of contracts before its incorporation. (3) Whether this transaction comes under the purview of Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act. (2) The rights of the company in respect of contracts before its incorporation. (3) Whether this transaction comes under the purview of Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act. The word `promoter' is not defined by the Companies Act 1 of 1956 or by its predecessor Act VII of 1913. (2) The rights of the company in respect of contracts before its incorporation. (3) Wheth....