Uncovering Judgments: Did Advocates JNK Sharma and <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> Appear Together?

In the intricate world of Indian legal proceedings, tracking advocate appearances in judgments can be crucial for researchers, law students, practitioners, and parties involved in litigation. Whether you're verifying counsel involvement in specific cases or conducting due diligence, knowing where advocates like JNK Sharma and <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> have represented clients provides valuable context. This post dives into a targeted query: Find Judgments Wherein Jnk Sharma Advocate and a K Singla Adv Appeared. We'll analyze available legal documents, highlight key findings, and integrate insights from related sources to offer a comprehensive overview.

The Legal Query and Its Importance

The question at hand seeks judgments explicitly recording the appearances of both Advocate <counsel>J.N.K. Sharmacounsel> (often stylized as JNK Sharma) and Advocate <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> (or variations like K. Singla). Advocate appearances are typically noted in court orders, attendance sheets, and final judgments, serving as official records of representation. These details are essential for:- Case history research: Understanding counsel strategies and outcomes.- Professional networking: Identifying collaborative legal teams.- Compliance checks: Verifying advocate involvement in ongoing matters.

However, comprehensive searches across databases like NCLT, SCDRC, and high court records often yield nuanced results, as we'll explore below.

Key Findings: No Joint Appearances Identified

Overview from Primary Analysis

Based on an exhaustive review of provided legal documents, there are no judgments explicitly mentioning the appearance of both JNK Sharma advocate and <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> advocate together in the same case. This conclusion stems from a detailed scan of multiple references:

• <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel>'s Mentions: The documents contain multiple references to <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel>, notably as an advocate involved in various cases, including those related to judicial proceedings, release conditions, and other legal matters e.g..g. 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 29011 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 72 1995 0 Supreme(Del) 134 2011 0 Supreme(Del) 372. For instance, <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> is noted in contexts involving counsel submissions and procedural matters.
• JNK Sharma's Absence: <counsel>J.N.K. Sharmacounsel> advocate is not explicitly mentioned in any of the provided documents. No records link this advocate to the cases reviewed.
• Similar Initials but No Matches: Variations like A. K. Singla appear, but no pairing with JNK Sharma exists.

Conclusion from Core Documents: There is no record within the provided documents of a judgment where both appeared together. Generally, such absences highlight the specificity required in legal database searches.

Insights from Additional Sources: Related Advocate Mentions

To provide deeper context, we examined supplementary sources, revealing patterns with similarly named advocates but no direct hits for JNK Sharma and A.K./K. Singla together. These cases span NCLT, SCDRC, Supreme Court, and other forums, often involving insolvency, consumer disputes, and civil matters.

Notable Cases Involving Similar Names

• SCDRC Cases with <counsel>Rajiv Sharmacounsel> and <counsel>Abhishek Singlacounsel>: Multiple consumer dispute resolutions feature <counsel>Rajiv Sharmacounsel> Advocate appeared on behalf of the OP and <counsel>Abhishek Singlacounsel>, Advocate, but adjournments were granted for power of attorney filings 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 15242 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 14705 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 13933. For example: <counsel>Rajiv Sharmacounsel> Advocate appeared on behalf of the OP and the case was adjourned to 22.11.2021 for filing of power of attorney alongwith written version by the OP. On 22.11.2021, Sh. <counsel>Abhishek Singlacounsel>, Advocate 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 15242. No JNK Sharma or K. Singla here.

• NCLT Proceedings with JNK References: Cases like JNK Lifter Pvt. mention advocates but not JNK Sharma personally. In one: <counsel>Arnab Sinhacounsel>, Adv. ] Mr. <counsel>A.Basucounsel>, Adv. ] Mr.<counsel>Snehashis Sencounsel>, Adv. ] For Corporate Debtor... HON’BLE MEMBER(T), SHRI BALRAJ JOSHI... IN THE MATTER OF JNK LIFTER PVT.

  JNK Lifter Pvt. Ltd. VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - National Company Law Tribunal

  . Similarly, <counsel>Mansi Guptacounsel>, Adv... For Liquidator... Adv. <counsel>Rohan Agrawalcounsel>... JNK 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4569. JNK likely refers to the corporate entity, not the advocate.

• Supreme Court and High Court Mentions:

• JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA... VERSUS <counsel>RAVI SINGLAcounsel> lists various advocates but no JNK Sharma or <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> match 2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9429.
• Shivam Garg, Adv. Ms. <counsel>Varsha Sharmacounsel>, Adv. Mr. <counsel>Lalit Singlacounsel>, Adv... JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA 2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3756.

• Customs-related: Mr. <counsel>Aditya Singlacounsel>, SSC... Mr. <counsel>Akhil Sharmacounsel> 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10135.

• Other Procedural Notes: Instances like Adv. <counsel>Sanjay Wakurecounsel> appeared for appellant and Adv. <counsel>K.M. Bardapurkarcounsel> appeared for LIC

  Shahaji Janardan Kadam VS Life Insurance Corporation of India - Consumer

  or Sh. <counsel>D.K. Sharmacounsel>, Adv. for R-3 2009 0 Supreme(Del) 1411 show diverse counsel but no target matches. In criminal matters: Accused 5 and 12 appeared through Adv. <counsel>K.K. Dheerendrakrishnancounsel> 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 525; <counsel>S.K. Sharmacounsel>... Sh. <counsel>Parveen Sharmacounsel>, Adv. 2014 0 Supreme(Del) 1026.

Patterns and Observations

• Frequent Sharma Variants: Names like <counsel>Rajiv Sharmacounsel>, Satish Chandra Sharma, Piyush Sharma, and <counsel>D.K. Sharmacounsel> appear across SCDRC, NCLAT, and high courts, but none align with JNK Sharma.
• Singla Variations: <counsel>Abhishek Singlacounsel>, <counsel>Ravi Singlacounsel>, <counsel>Lalit Singlacounsel>, and <counsel>Aditya Singlacounsel> recur, often in respondent or petitioner roles, yet no A.K./K. Singla with JNK Sharma.
• No Joint Records: Across sources like 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 15242 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 14705 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 13933 2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9429 2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3756 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4450, multiple cases feature appearances by Advocate <counsel>Rajiv Sharmacounsel> and Advocate <counsel>Abhishek Singlacounsel>, but there is no record of either Jnk Sharma Advocate or K Singla Advocate appearing together or individually.

Why No Matches? Challenges in Legal Research

Legal databases may use abbreviated names, typos, or omit full appearances in summaries. Factors include:1. Name Variations: Jnk could be initials (e.g..g., J.N.K.); a K Singla as <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel>.2. Database Limitations: Provided docs cover select cases; full repositories like Manupatra, SCC Online, or e.g.-Courts may reveal more.3. Procedural Omissions: Not all hearings list all counsel.

Recommendation: For thorough verification, consult broader platforms or court registries. Tools like case status portals can filter by advocate names.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

In summary, no judgments in the reviewed documents record joint or individual appearances by Advocates JNK Sharma and <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel>/K. Singla. While <counsel>A.K. Singlacounsel> appears in procedural contexts e.g..g. 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 29011, JNK Sharma does not, and related sources highlight similar names without overlaps 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 15242

JNK Lifter Pvt. Ltd. VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - National Company Law Tribunal

Key Takeaways:- Always cross-reference multiple databases for advocate searches.- Name inconsistencies are common; use advanced filters.- This analysis underscores the precision needed in legal inquiries.

Disclaimer: This post provides general information based on specified documents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for case-specific guidance. Word count: 1028.

References:- Primary: e.g..g. 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 29011 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 72 1995 0 Supreme(Del) 134 2011 0 Supreme(Del) 372- Additional:

JNK Lifter Pvt. Ltd. VS Simplex Infrastructures Limited - National Company Law Tribunal

Life Insurance Corporation of India vs Sandeep Singla and Others - Consumer State

Shahaji Janardan Kadam VS Life Insurance Corporation of India - Consumer