Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Writ Non-Maintainability Against Private Banks - Several cases establish that writ petitions are generally not maintainable against private banks unless they perform public functions or are considered State entities under Article 12 of the Constitution. For example, it was held that ordinarily no writ would lie against a private Bank ["Koneru Venu Madhav VS Kotak Mahindra Bank Private Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh"], but Scheduled Banks governed by RBI regulations are amenable to writ jurisdiction ["Assam Co-Operative Apex Bank Ltd. VS Punjab National Bank - Gauhati"], ["AUTHORISED OFFICER SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. vs NAVAS SULAIMAN - Kerala"].
Public Sector Banks as State - Public sector or nationalized banks discharging public functions are considered State and can be subjected to writ jurisdiction. For instance, the court observed that the appellant - Bank, being a public sector Bank, discharging public functions is a 'State' in terms of Art.12 ["Zonal Manager Central Bank of India v. M/s. Devi Ispat Ltd. and Others - Supreme Court"]. Similarly, the High Court issued a writ of mandamus to a nationalized bank for the return of security documents ["Zonal Manager Central Bank of India v. M/s. Devi Ispat Ltd. and Others - Supreme Court"].
Writs for Specific Reliefs and Public Duty - Writ petitions may be entertained when the bank is performing a public duty or function, such as recovery of dues or enforcement of statutory rights. For example, the court directed a scheduled bank to give effect to restructuring benefits ["State Bank Of India VS Varun Roshan Kohli - Calcutta"], and another case involved a writ for recovery and possession issues ["P.ARIVALAGAN vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA - Madras"].
Limitations and Discretion - Courts have held that writ petitions are not appropriate for adjudicating disputes of fact or contractual rights unless the bank is performing a public function. For example, the writ Court cannot adjudicate disputed facts of this nature ["MONOTECH SYSTEMS LTD vs Standard Chartered Bank - Madras"], and the maintainability depends on whether the bank is a State or private.
Court Directions and Orders - Courts have issued directions in cases involving banks, such as directing banks to take action against respondents or to consider proposals, but only within the scope of their public functions ["K. V. Brahmaji Rao VS Union of India - Delhi"], ["P.ARIVALAGAN vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Writ against City Bank (a private bank) is generally not maintainable unless the bank is performing public functions or is deemed a State under Article 12. The cases indicate that Scheduled Banks and nationalized banks are amenable to writ jurisdiction, but private banks are not, unless specific circumstances justify it. Therefore, legal recourse against City Bank would depend on whether it is acting in a public capacity or not. In most instances, disputes related to contractual or recovery matters are better suited for civil courts rather than writ courts, unless the bank's actions involve public duties ["Koneru Venu Madhav VS Kotak Mahindra Bank Private Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh"], ["Zonal Manager Central Bank of India v. M/s. Devi Ispat Ltd. and Others - Supreme Court"].
References:- ["Annapoorani vs The Managing Director - Madras"]- ["MONOTECH SYSTEMS LTD vs Standard Chartered Bank - Madras"]- ["Rekha Neypally VS Union Bank of India - Telangana"]- ["State Bank Of India VS Varun Roshan Kohli - Calcutta"]- ["K. V. Brahmaji Rao VS Union of India - Delhi"]- ["ANUJEE et al. v. LEWIS et al."]- ["AUTHORISED OFFICER SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. vs NAVAS SULAIMAN - Kerala"]- ["Zonal Manager Central Bank of India v. M/s. Devi Ispat Ltd. and Others - Supreme Court"]
Imagine you're a borrower facing aggressive recovery actions from your city bank—perhaps under the SARFAESI Act—and you're tempted to rush to the High Court with a writ petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. But is this the right move? Many individuals ask: writ against city bank—seeking quick judicial intervention against private banks like City Union Bank or similar urban financial institutions.
In this post, we dive deep into the legal landscape, drawing from Supreme Court and High Court judgments. We'll clarify when such writs are maintainable, highlight exceptions, and outline better alternatives like statutory remedies. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Article 226 empowers High Courts to issue writs for enforcing fundamental rights or for any other purpose. However, this extraordinary jurisdiction is typically reserved for actions by the 'State' or its instrumentalities under Article 12. Private entities, including most banks, are generally outside this purview unless they perform public functions or are under pervasive State control. Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22Vinodini VS Union of India - Dishonour Of Cheque (2007)
Private banks, even scheduled ones regulated by the RBI, do not automatically qualify as 'State.' As held in Federal Bank Ltd. v. Sagar Thomas: A private company carrying on banking business as a scheduled bank, cannot be termed as an institution or company carrying on any statutory or public duty. Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22
City banks—typically private entities—are not considered 'State' merely due to RBI licensing or regulation. Courts have consistently ruled that writs challenging their actions (e.g., loan recovery, NPA declaration, or possession under SARFAESI) are generally not maintainable. Key reasons include:
In Phoenix ARC Private Limited v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir, the Supreme Court emphasized pursuing statutory remedies over writs when available. Ashok Kumar Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2011 0 Supreme(Gau) 913Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22
Judgments reinforce this stance:
For instance, in a case involving refusal of a solvency certificate, the court dismissed the writ appeal: The bank is not performing any public duty and hence, writ petition is not maintainable. Y. Sleebachan VS State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary to Government, PWD Department - 2020 Supreme(Ker) 573
Similarly, for a co-operative city service bank facing PF demands, the writ was dismissed as statutory compliance was required. Calicut City Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. VS Employees Provident Fund Organisation Sub Regional Office - 2019 Supreme(Ker) 66
While rare for typical city banks, exceptions exist:
These cases show writs may lie if arbitrariness, statutory violations, or public duty elements are proven—but not for routine commercial disputes.
Courts bar writs when alternatives exist:
When statutory remedies are provided, courts should refrain from entertaining writ petitions unless there is a violation of statutory duty. Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22Ashok Kumar Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2011 0 Supreme(Gau) 913
In student loan recovery, banks can proceed against guarantors post-moratorium without writ interference. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE VS VASANTHA KUMARI - 2012 Supreme(Ker) 963
Before considering a writ:
Generally, writs against city banks are not maintainable under Article 226 unless they discharge public functions or are State instrumentalities. Private banks remain commercial entities, with disputes best resolved via DRT, SARFAESI, or civil suits. Exceptions are narrow, requiring proof of control or duty breaches, as seen in select judgments. Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22Vinodini VS Union of India - Dishonour Of Cheque (2007)R. P. Rajah VS The Chairman Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. & Others - 2004 0 Supreme(Mad) 1001
Key Takeaways:- Pursue statutory remedies first to avoid dismissal.- Regulation alone doesn't invite writs.- Exceptions demand strong evidence of public role.
Stay informed, act strategically, and consult professionals. For more on banking disputes, explore our related posts.
References:1. Federal Bank LTD. VS Sagar Thomas - 2003 7 Supreme 22: Private banks not State; no writs.2. Vinodini VS Union of India - Dishonour Of Cheque (2007): Control and public duty tests.3. R. P. Rajah VS The Chairman Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. & Others - 2004 0 Supreme(Mad) 1001: Statutory channels preferred.4. Other cases: Paramount Constructions Company VS Authorized Officer and Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank - 2023 Supreme(Kar) 360, Zia Ud Din Changal VS Kashmir Mercantile Cooperative Bank - 2021 Supreme(J&K) 513, Y. Sleebachan VS State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary to Government, PWD Department - 2020 Supreme(Ker) 573, Alchemist Reality Ltd. VS Punjab and Sind Bank, Rajpal Singh VS State of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 1561.
#WritPetition #BankingLaw #Article226
The Branch Manager, City Union Bank Ltd., Ayyampatti, Thanjavur District 614 201. ... ... The Managing Director, City Union Bank Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District 612 001. 2. ... The General Manager, Inspector Department of City Union Bank, Central Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District 612 001. 3. ... competent Court to declare the certified copy to be treated as original since the original has been lost by the bank at the cost of the bank in spe....
However, the writ Court cannot adjudicate disputed facts of this nature. Thus the Writ Petition per se is not maintainable. ... 2.Business Head, Standard Chartered Bank of India, SME Division, I Floor, Sagar Amar Court, 59, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. 3.Standard Chartered Bank, SME Banking, 2nd Floor, 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... 1.Standard Chartered Bank of India, Rep. by its Business Head, SME Division, I Floor, Sagar Amar Court, 59, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 6....
on the file of IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, which is pending consideration and the prayer “C” prayed for by the petitioner thereunder is identical to the consequential prayer sought for in the present writ petition. ... Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed O.S.No.404 of 2018 on the file of IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, and the same is pending. ... The petitioner approached the court seeking prayer as under : “.....to issue Writ, Order or Direction more in th....
In the case of City and Industrial Development Corpn. Vs. ... In the light of the modified reliefs sought by the writ petitioners before the writ court, the learned Single Judge noted that the relief sought for, from the writ court only relates to the conduct of the bank in failing to inform the writ petitioner of the restructuring, and compelling the writ petitioner ... On the basis of such finding the learned Single Judge directed the bank to give ....
The petitioner being Executive Director was also responsible for supervising Mumbai Zone and Mumbai City Circle under which PNB Brady House Branch, Fort, Mumbai falls. ... The respondent no. 3/Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as "CBI"), Bank Securities and Fraud Cell, Mumbai on 31.01.2018 registered RC.BSM 2018 E0001 (subject matter of writ petition bearing no W.P. ... The petitioner in writ petitions bearing no W.P. (Crl.) 3609/2018 and W.P. ... The petitioner by filling the Writ#HL_END....
IN THE MATTER OP AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION. Company-Jurisdiction to wind up Bank-Powers of District Court-Courts . Ordinance, s. 62-Writ of prohibition. ... When an inferior Court is exceeding its jurisdiction, a superior Court is bound to grant a writ of prohibition-The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of London v. Cox et al [2 (1867) 2 H. L. 239 at 254, 277 et seq. ].2; Worthington v. Jeffries [3 (1875) 10 C. ... THIS was an application for a writ of prohibition ....
The Bank came to know from the customers that there was certain dues of the Electricity Department against the Company, consequently, Additional District Magistrate (City), Saharanpur, forcibly had taken possession of the premises of the Company from the Bank on 08.12.2018. ... The writ petitioners before the Court are bank officials of the rank of Assistant General Manager, Field General Manager, Chief Manager and Branch Manager. 5. ... The evil design of the complainant is writ large....
Thereafter on enquiry regarding his name and address I came to know that his name is Yallappa S/o Late Gurappa, 94 years, R/o No. 472/2, Sorahunise Varthur, Bangalore city and the original Madhava Iyengar was expired during the year 1976. ... and mortgaged the same to your bank. ... Bank and is seeking refund of the said amount in the same manner a Bank would charge interest on borrowals. ... The case at hand would form a classic illustration for entertainment of a writ petition allowing a money claim, ....
From the above, it is concluded that ordinarily no writ would lie against a private Bank. ... Therefore, it cannot be said that no writ would lie against a Scheduled Bank in all circumstances. In the instant case, the fact that the respondent Bank is a Scheduled Bank is not in dispute. ... It is to be noted here that the judgments refers to Private Bank/Bank/ARC. The word ‘Bank’ referred to therein may take within its fold Nationali....
..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to take necessary action as against the Respondent Nos.6 to 8 and consequently, ... The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram City Police, Tambaram, Chennai – 600045. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Range, Tambaram Police Station, Tambaram. 5. ... 2.Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition st....
Therefore, it can safely be stated that the respondent Bank qualifies to be a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution. Thus, writ petition is maintainable against the respondent Bank.
Though learned counsel for the appellant has raised a contention that on the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the account of the appellant can be declared as NPA or not, we are not inclined to delve into the same, as the core question, raised and to be considered is, whether a bank is performing a sovereign function, similar to that of State? Whether a writ petition is maintainable against a bank?
The writ petitioner is Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. The petitioner states that Ext.P1 inspection report issued by the Enforcement Officer of the 1st respondent-Employees' Provident Fund Organisation is liable to be quashed and the 1st respondent should be prohibited from issuing any further demand to the petitioner relating to the remittance of Provident Fund amount.
Writ Petition against bank allowed with exemplary cost ********** An exemplary cost of Rs. 5000/- is imposed upon the respondent Bank for having committed the breach of trust and faith as expected by petitioner No.1 and the Court, in proceedings.
The moratorium period of one year has already expired and even after the expiry of such period, no repayment was made. According to the appellant/bank, loan was availed of by the student as well as the guardian. It is stated that the documents indicate that the 2nd writ petitioner, the father of the student, had also singed the loan papers as guardian of his daughter and therefore the appellant/bank was justified in proceeding against the second writ petitioner as well. Hence the bank was entitled to proceed against the writ petitioners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
