Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Authorised Officer South Indian Bank ltd., Regional office – – Appellant
Versus
Navas Sulaiman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the loan liability and prior defaults (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. maintainability and context of previous judgments (Para 4 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. srfaesi act and jurisdictional limitations (Para 11 , 17 , 24) |
| 4. relief sought and legal entitlements (Para 19 , 21 , 30) |
| 5. judgment dismissal based on maintainability (Para 36) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
1. Respondents 1 and 2 in W.P.(C)No.45979 of 2025 have filed this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 08.12.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the respondent herein-petitioner, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 therein (appellants herein), namely, the Authorised Officer of South Indian Bank Ltd. and the Manager, South Indian Bank Ltd., Alappuzha Branch, to grant time till 31.03.2026 to the petitioner to clear off his liability in the loan accounts with the Bank. The document marked as Ext.P1 is a copy of notice dated 14.08.2024 issued by the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
