AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion: The main points indicate that convictions under Section 55 of the Akbari Act hinge on proper jurisdiction, valid investigation, and clear proof of illicit substances. Any procedural lapses or violations of licensing rules can lead to acquittal or the setting aside of convictions. Additionally, partnership arrangements involving licenses under the Act are scrutinized for legality and public policy compliance, often resulting in nullification if found unlawful. Courts consistently emphasize adherence to legal procedures and proper jurisdiction to uphold the validity of prosecutions under this section.

Search Results for "55 i of the Akbari Act"

A. N. Rajan VS State of Kerala

2013 0 Supreme(Ker) 1032 India - Kerala

V.K.MOHANAN

xxxv of criminal procedural code and the court will set aside the conviction of the person under section 55 of akbari act and if ... Abkari Act, 1077, Sections 4, 50 and 55 - Criminal Trial - - If the abkari officer has not having territorial jurisdiction it will ... be held as illegal, null and void where by he has the power to make reports and it is held in section 50 of abkari act and in chapter ... Thus, when the accused appeare....

SURENDRAN Vs STATE OF KERALA

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 23929 India - High Court of Kerala

K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH, J

Abkari - Conviction Appeal - Akbari Act Section 8, 55 - Court found the investigation invalid due to lack of jurisdiction by filing ... Fact of the Case: The appellants were convicted under the Akbari Act for possession of contraband arrack. ... Act, which compromised the validity of the prosecution's case. ... Conviction is under Section 8 (1) and (2) and Section 55 (a) of the Akbari Act. The appellants herein w....

KERALA STATE,REP BY EXCISE INSPECTOR vs AJAIKUMAR T K

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24796 India - High Court of Kerala

K.R. UDAYABHANU, J

The matter relates to the raid conducted in the premises of Century Club, Vennala, and the crime registered vide Crime No.21/2002 of Ernakulam Excise Range with respect to the offence under Section 55(a) of the Akbari Act.

Gracy Thomas VS State of Kerala

2015 0 Supreme(Ker) 1160 India - Kerala

B.KEMAL PASHA

Criminal Procedure Code, 1908 -Section 318 - Kerala Akbari Act, 1077 - Sections 55(a) and 8 - petitioner ... No. 176 of 2004 of the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 55(a) and 8 (1) & (2) of the Abkari Act. ... 2.

Krishnankutty VS State of Kerala, rep. by Excise Inspector

2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 239 India - Kerala

J.M.JAMES

Kerala Abkari Act 1077 - Section -55(a) - Accused has faced trial for the offence under S.55(a) of the Abkari ... Act before the Additional Sessions Court (Ad Hoc-1), Thodupuzha. ... There must be proof that the remaining materials were liquor and prohibited under the Act and Rules. ... Therefore, the prosecution failed to prove the offence alleged against him under Section 55(a) of the Akbari Act, is the submissio....

Messrs.  D.  Mohideen Sahib and Co. , Excise Contractors, Bellary VS The Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.

1950 0 Supreme(Mad) 27 India - Madras

SATYANARAYANA RAO, VISWANATHA SASTRI

Income-tax Act, 1922-Section 36-A -Legality of the order of Income Tax Officer refusing to register partnership for carrying on arrack ... The reason for this conclusion is stated to be that such a partnership arrangement either involves a transfer of the licence which is prohibited under Rule 27 and punishable under section 56, or is a breach of section 15 of the Akbari Act punishable under section 55 because the unlicensed partner, by ... The partnership was declared to be illegal on the ground that it violated Rule 27....

MORIS TELLIS vs THE STATE OF KERALA

India - Supreme Court

(a) of the Akbari Act by the High Court of Kerala on 2.8.2011 in the Criminal For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Petitioner was convicted under Section 55 ... REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2020.08.31 17:15:55 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified div id=

GOBARDHAN CHAKRABORTY VS ABANI MOHAN

1990 0 Supreme(Cal) 82 India - Calcutta

MAHITOSH MAJUMDAR

Legality of partnership agreement - Partnership agreement involving transfer of licence granted under West Bengal Cinema (Regulation) Act ... The partnership agreement is opposed to public policy as it contravenes the provisions of the said Act and the Rules. 3. ... The defendant No. 1 was the holder of a temporary license under the said Act and the said Rules in his own name as proprietor but ... Sivascoriam Pillai, AIR 1950 444 (supra) after considering the provisions of Ss. 15, 55 and 56 of the Madras Akbari....

Gobardhan Chakraborty VS Abani Mohan Chakraborty

1990 0 Supreme(Cal) 85 India - Calcutta

Mahitosh Majumdar

The High Court held that the partnership agreement was opposed to public policy in terms of s. 23 of the Indian Contract Act as it ... Whether the partnership agreement was opposed to Public policy in terms of s. 23 of the Indian Contract Act and the agreement itself ... partnership agreement was illegal as it involved a transfer of the licence, which was prohibited by the West Bengal Cinema Regulations Act ... Sivoscoriam Pillai (supra) after considering the provisions of ss. 15, 55 and 56 of the Madras Akbari....

ANANDAN vs STATE OF KERALA

India - Supreme Court

(a) of the Akbari Act for transportation of spirit appellant to seven years imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- under Section 55

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top