AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Legislative acts such as the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and various land and religious laws have systematically abolished a range of traditional rights—landownership (Zamindari, proprietary, tenancy), reversionary, hereditary, and religious rights—aiming to modernize land and social relations. The abolition of these rights often involved legal provisions that rendered previous claims or interests invalid or unenforceable, marking a significant shift toward state ownership and regulation of land and religious endowments.

Search Results for "Abolished Rights"

Subhadra Devi VS State Of Bihar

2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 821 India - Patna

RAVI S.DHAVAN, SHASHANK KR.SINGH

on the interpretation of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, which abolished Zamindari rights and rendered any subsequent land transactions ... of a tract of land and sought compensation, but the court dismissed the claim based on the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, which abolished ... Zamindari rights and rendered subsequent land transactions void. ... The relevant aspect is that when the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 received the assent of the President of India on 25 September, 1950, in effect, Zamindari was abol....

RANGACHARYA RAMACHARYA JOSHI VS VIRUPAX KARVIR KULKARNI

1971 0 Supreme(Kar) 128 India - Karnataka

NARAYANA PAI, VENKATASWAMI

of possession and regrant under the Abolition Act Ratio Decidendi: The resumption under S. 3 of the Abolition Act abolished ... Government under S. 3 of the Act Finding of the Court: The court held that the resumption under S. 3 of the Abolition Act abolished ... all rights in watan and watan lands, including the rights of possession acquired through alienation not protected by S. 5 of the ... The resumption is pursuant to S 3 of the Act which reads as follows:"with effect from and or, the appointed day, notwithstanding....

Swarna Gadadhara Babu VS State of Telangana Rep.  by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department

2018 0 Supreme(AP) 168 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

section 37, 34 – Writ petition filed – praying to direct the proceedings of respondent number three declaring petitioner having no right ... name it is called in any religious institution or endowment shall on the commencement of this Act stand abolished. ... Section 34 of the Act defines as erstwhile hereditary rights of the Archakas under the old Act were originally abolished that continue including by Act 17/1966, the very coming into force of the Act, 30 of 1987 by incorporation of sub section 3 of Section 34 by the ....

Radha Rani Bhargava VS Hanuman Prasad Bhargava

1965 0 Supreme(SC) 138 India - Supreme Court

R.S.BACHAWAT, A.K.SARKAR, J.R.MUDHOLKAR

Issues: Whether the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, abolished reversionary rights and rendered a suit for a declaration that an ... reversionary rights and rendered the suit not maintainable. ... The alienees appealed to the High Court, which dismissed the suit in 1957, holding that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, abolished ... The High Court took the view that the effect of Ss. 14, 15 and 16 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was that after the coming into force of the Act, there are no reversioners and no reversionary #HL_....

Brojonath Mozumdar VS Ram Chunder Chuckerbutty

1879 0 Supreme(Cal) 41 India - Calcutta

ROMESH CHUNDER MITTER, RICHARD GARTH, PONTIFEX, JACKSON, BIRCH

Issues: Whether Act XL of 1858 abolished the rights and powers of guardians under Hindu Law. ... The question before the court was whether Act XL of 1858 abolished the rights and powers of guardians under Hindu Law. ... Guardianship - Minor's Property - Act XL of 1858 - Sections 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10-12, 18, 25, 27 - The Act does not abolish the rights ... That the rights and powers of guardians (by deputation from the sovereign in theory) were recognized by the Hindu Law is certain; that....

CHHOTE KHAN VS MOHAMMAD OBEDULLA KHAN

1953 0 Supreme(Nagpur) 39 India - Nagpur

SINHA, HIDAYATULLAH, MUDHOLKAR

Act I of 1951) (the Act) abolished proprietary rights in land and vested them in the State. ... The Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (Act I of 1951) (the Act) abolished ... The Court also held that the Act did not save any rights obtained under a decree, unless those rights came within the saving clauses ... It has abolished all intermediate interests in land between the State at the top and the actual occupan....

M. NARAYANAPPA VS HEMAVATHI

1987 0 Supreme(Kar) 7 India - Karnataka

KULKARNI

The court emphasized that the Act abolished the concept of tenancy after 1-3-1974 and highlighted the rights and privileges conferred ... Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Land Reforms Act, which abolished tenancy rights ... after 1-3-1974 and conferred specific rights and privileges on tenants. ... Therefore, it becomes clear that the tenancy will not be in force or in effect after 1-3-1974 because the Land reforms Act has abolished the conc....

Jai Ram Devi Ditta VS Tota Ram Hardev Ram

1961 0 Supreme(P&H) 14 India - Punjab and Haryana

G.D.KHOSLA, S.S.DULAT

Issues: Whether the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, abolished the reversionary rights of Tota Ram. ... the reversionary rights of Tota Ram. ... the Court: The court held that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which came into force during the pendency of the appeal, abolished ... He however, found that the Act did not touch the mortgagee rights which had been transferred by Mehr Devi before the Act and at a time when she was a limited owner, and, in the circumstances, the reversioner still had a ri....

DHIRAJKUNWAR VS LAKHANSINGH

1956 0 Supreme(MP) 56 India - Madhya Pradesh

BHUTT, SEN

The court held that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, abolished the reversionary rights of the plaintiff and therefore, his suit was ... to question her alienations was also abolished. ... RIGHTS ACT, 1929 - SECTION 3 - REPEAL - EFFECT. ... Since now the widow's estate has been abolished by the Hindu Succession Act, it necessarily follows that the right of a reversioner, which is otherwise a spes suceessionis, cannot now be enforced. ... This does not, however, mean that the law recognis....

M K PANKAJAKSHAN NAIR vs KSEB    Advocate - SRI JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD SRI JAICE JACOBSCKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8899 India - High Court of Kerala

B.P.RAY, J

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that once a scheme is abolished, the rights of individuals under that scheme cannot ... Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the additional load under the abolished Minimum Guarantee Agreement Scheme, ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the Minimum Guarantee Agreement Scheme had been abolished and the petitioner ... The learned standing counsel for KSEB submits that Board has abolished the above said scheme and the petitioner can avail the g....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top