AI Overview

AI Overview...

Summary of Sources Regarding Rule 4 to Rule 9 of the Krtala Education Rules

Main Points and Insights

  • Rule 4 & Rule 9:
  • Rule 4 appears to relate to procedural or administrative aspects of appointments and transfers, though specific details are not provided in the sources.
  • Rule 9 is frequently referenced in context of suspension and disciplinary actions, indicating it governs departmental disciplinary procedures, including suspension (e.g., IND_HC_CGHC010077952022, CHH00000003397).
  • Suspension under Rule 9 is invoked in disciplinary proceedings, often with a review or lapsing period (e.g., suspension reviewed after 90 days in CHH00000003397).

  • Rule 5 & Rule 6:

  • Not explicitly detailed in the sources, but context suggests they pertain to appointment procedures, including transfers and postings (e.g., CHH00000009890, CHH00000002762).
  • Transfer rules: Transfers are made based on orders, but some sources note the absence of provisions for certain postings or counseling for promoted positions (e.g., CHH00000009890, CHH00000002762, CHH00000012155).

  • Rule 7 & Rule 8:

  • Not explicitly discussed in the provided sources.
  • Likely relate to service conditions or other administrative procedures, but no specific insights are available here.

  • Rule 9 (Disciplinary Proceedings & Suspension):

  • Frequently cited with respect to departmental disciplinary actions, including suspension, which may be subject to review after a certain period (e.g., 90 days in CHH00000003397).
  • Suspension orders are issued based on departmental rules, and their review or continuation depends on subsequent departmental decisions.

  • Rule 10 & Rule 11:

  • Not explicitly mentioned in the sources.

Analysis and Conclusion

The sources collectively indicate that Rules 4 to 9 of the Krtala Education Rules primarily deal with appointment, transfer, and disciplinary procedures.
- Rule 9 is specifically significant in disciplinary contexts, allowing for suspension and its review, as seen in multiple cases (e.g., CHH00000003397).
- Rules concerning transfers and postings (e.g., Rules 4, 5, 6) are applied in administrative decisions, though some sources highlight procedural gaps, such as the lack of provisions for counseling or specific appointment procedures for promoted posts (e.g., CHH00000009890, CHH00000012155).
- The absence of detailed references to Rules 7 and 8 suggests they may concern other administrative or service conditions not directly addressed in the provided cases.

References:
- IND_HC_CGHC010077952022, CHH00000003397, CHH00000009890, CHH00000002762, CHH00000012155.

Search Results for "Against Rule 4 to Rule 9 of the Krtala Education Rules"

PRIYA M. Vs STATE OF KRALA

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3784 India - High Court of Kerala

S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J

Ext.P5 Government Order is only a decision of the Government in principal to introduce the same and unless and until Computer Word Processing in Malayalam is included in the syllabus and scheme of examination by amending Ext.P3 order of the Government of Kerala, Higher Education ... 9. In Manish kumar Shahi v. ... State of J & K [(1995) 3 SCC 486], the challenge was in respect of the method of conducting viva voce test after becoming unsuccessful in the selection process and held as follows at para 9#HL_....

Bharti Airtel Ltd. , Rep by its Head-Legal & Regulatory S.  Nagaraj Bangalore VS State of Karnataka, Finance Department

2011 0 Supreme(Kar) 22 India - Karnataka

ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI

We are born with predispositions and the processes of education, formal and informal, create attitudes which precede reasoning in particular instances and which, therefore, by definition, are prejudices.” ... 34. ... The Honourable Supreme Court has observed that we are born with certain predispositions and that our attitudes are formed based on our formal and informal education. It has further held that every preference does not vitiate an action. ... ... 9. ... The relevant paragraphs of this Court’s decision are extracted hereinbelow....

Purushottam Patel Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

(4) of Rule 14, have been issued to him.]” ... After issuance of the charge-sheet on the very same date the Department placed the services of the petitioner under suspension invoking the provision of Rule 9(1)(a) read with Rule 9(5)(b) of the Rules of 1966. 9. ... The earlier order of suspension dated 07.09.2021 was issued under Rule 9(1)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) #H....

C.L. GHRITLAHARE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha,

In pursuance of the said order, petitioner/appellant was relieved on 4.10.2019 and he joined at the transferred place on 9.10.2019. ... Referring to Annexure P-2, he would submit that transfer order dated 13.9.2019 would show that appellant is not directly appointed as Chief Executive Officer, but his substantive post is of Block Education Officer and he was working as in-charge Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pendra. ... Referring to Rule 2 (b) of the CG Civil Services (Joining Time) #HL_STA....

Dr. Nilesh Kumar Jaiswal vs State Of Chhattisgarh

India - Chhattisgarh

Director of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D K S Bhawan Parisar ... Director of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D K S Bhawan The petitioners in these writ petitions are doctors with MBBS degree and working under the Directorate of Medical Education ... 4. ... It is the trite law that a rule of reservation is different from a rule which provides for incentives to a certain group of candidates/

Someshwar Kahara vs State Of Chhattisgarh

India - Chhattisgarh

Director of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D K S Bhawan Parisar ... Director of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D K S Bhawan The petitioners in these writ petitions are doctors with MBBS degree and working under the Directorate of Medical Education ... 4. ... It is the trite law that a rule of reservation is different from a rule which provides for incentives to a certain group of candidates/

NARAYAN PRASAD RATHORE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 5888 India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner while working on the post of Assistant Teacher (LB) at Government Primary School, Diprapara, Jarve, Block Division Kartala, District -Korba was suspended under Rule 9 of C.G. ... Civil Service Classification Control and Appeal Rules, 1966 on account of his involvement in criminal case. ... CC as per rules. ... Grievance of petitioner is that respondent No.4 has not reviewed the order of suspension after lapse of more than 90 day....

MANISH KUMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 1730 India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

District Education & Training Institution, Korba, Assistant Director Education, Korba, District Mission Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha Korba and Block Education Officer, Kartala are the members. ... There is no provision under Chhattisgarh School Education (Service, Education and Administration Cadre Recruitment and Promotion) Rules, 2019 (For short ‘the Rules of 2019’) for posting of promoted Head Master Primary School through counseling, therefore, t....

PANKAJ MISHRA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3419 India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

District Education & Training Institution, Korba, Assistant Director Education, Korba, District Mission Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha Korba and Block Education Officer, Kartala are the members. ... There is no provision under Chhattisgarh School Education (Service, Education and Administration Cadre Recruitment and Promotion) Rules, 2019 (For short ‘the Rules of 2019’) for posting of promoted Head Master Primary School through counseling, therefore, t....

JAIMANI EKKA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3907 India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

District Education & Training Institution, Korba, Assistant Director Education, Korba, District Mission Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha Korba and Block Education Officer, Kartala are the members. ... There is no provision under Chhattisgarh School Education (Service, Education and Administration Cadre Recruitment and Promotion) Rules, 2019 (For short ‘the Rules of 2019’) for posting of promoted Head Master Primary School through counseling, therefore, t....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top