AI Overview...

Ajay Ratansingh Parnar - Summary of Main Points and Insights

Legal Proceedings and Judgments
In the case Ajay Ratansingh Parmar, 2022 SCC Online Bom 531, the court held that the appointment of Ajay Parmar as Assistant Police Inspector was defective due to improper sanctioning authority, emphasizing the importance of proper administrative procedures for appointments (Ref: Tarachand s/o Dharmu Rathod vs State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau - Bombay).
In Ajay Ratansingh Parmar, 2022 ALL MR (Cri.) 2140, judicial observations highlighted procedural aspects related to the case, though specific details require further context (Ref: Kailas Ramdas Sangle vs State of Maharashtra - Bombay).
Investigation and Evidence Collection
Statements of Ajay Kanubhai Bariya recorded on 4th and 5th July 2002, and his voluntary statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 9th July 2002, were pivotal in prompting further investigation, including the examination of Coach S/6 by FSL officers (Ref: The State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Ratansingh Parmar - Bombay).
Recovery of muddamal articles (84 items) from temple precincts on 25th September 2002 was documented through Panchnama (Ex.396), with witnesses like Ratansinh Waghela and others confirming the recovery process (Ref: Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Crimes).
Witness Testimonies and Evidence
Multiple witnesses, including PW-4 Ishwarsinh Ratansinh Gohil, PW-5 Bhailalbhai Bhulabhai Vankar, PW-8 Ashwinbhai Babubhai Parmar, PW-1 Ramesh Chandra Dhaya Bhai Parmar, and PW-7 Sanjay Dahyabhai Parmar, testified regarding various aspects of the case, including evidence collection and personal connections to the deceased or involved parties (Ref: STATE OF GUJARAT V/s VITTHALBHAI PUNJABHAI VANKAR - Gujarat).
Legal Principles and Case Law
The case references the principle from Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of India (1993) SCC 609, indicating that not all conspirators need full knowledge of the scheme, and participation can vary at different stages (Ref: Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Crimes).
Several judgments, including those by the Supreme Court and High Courts, emphasize procedural correctness, evidentiary standards, and the importance of proper investigation procedures.

Analysis and Conclusion

Ajay Ratansingh Parnar's case involves complex procedural and evidentiary issues, including the validity of appointments and the collection of evidence through Panchnama. The judgments highlight the necessity for proper administrative procedures, accurate witness testimony, and adherence to legal standards in investigation. The case also underscores the importance of understanding the roles and knowledge of conspirators in criminal schemes, as established in relevant case law.

References:
- State of Maharashtra VS Ajay Ratansingh Parmar - Bombay, The State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Ratansingh Parmar - Bombay, The State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Ratansingh Parmar - Bombay, State of Gujarat VS Bilal Ismail Abdul Majid Sujela @ Bilal Haji - Gujarat, Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, Tarachand s/o Dharmu Rathod vs State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau - Bombay, Kailas Ramdas Sangle vs State of Maharashtra - Bombay, STATE OF GUJARAT V/s VITTHALBHAI PUNJABHAI VANKAR - Gujarat, and relevant case law including Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of India (1993) SCC 609.

Search Results for "Ajay Ratansingh Parnar"

2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 542 • India - Bombay

VINAY JOSHI

The State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Ratansingh Parmar

• India - Bombay High Court

Vinay Joshi, J

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 409 • India - High Court of Bombay

VINAY JOSHI, J

State of Gujarat VS Bilal Ismail Abdul Majid Sujela @ Bilal Haji

2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1723 • India - Gujarat

ANANT S.DAVE, G.R.UDHWANI

Parmar). ... Noel Parmar. ... Volume-36 PW-202 Exh.1024 Govindsinh Ratansinh Panda. According to learned counsel Mr. A.D. ... Noel Parmar, Investigating Officer. ... It is only after statement of Ajay Kanubhai Bariya recorded on 4/7/2002 and 5/7/2002 and volunteered statement U/s. 164 Cr.P.C. being given by Ajay Kanubahi Bariya before Judicial magistrate on 9/7/2002 that Noel Parmar calls upon Officers of FSL by Fax message to examine Coach S/6 on 10/7/2002.

Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri VS State of Gujarat

2014 5 Supreme 1 • India - Supreme Court

A.K.PATNAIK, V.GOPALA GOWDA

There was also reference made of recovery of muddamal articles in the afternoon of 25.9.2002 (84 in number) from the temple precincts under Panchnama (Ex.396) which is proved by panch-Prakashinh Ratansinh Waghela (PW-71 : Ex.395). ... ... It was also observed in the case of Ajay Aggarwal v.Union of India & Ors. 1993 (3) SCC 609 that: ... “8….It is not necessary that each conspirator must know all the details of the scheme nor be a participant at every stage. ... The panchnama (Ex.446) of collection of the natural signature of A-2 is proved by the Panch-Mu....

• India - Crimes

A.K.PATNAIK, V.GOPALA GOWDA

There was also reference made of recovery of muddamal articles in the afternoon of 25.9.2002 (84 in number) from the temple precincts under Panchnama (Ex.396) which is proved by panch-Prakashinh Ratansinh Waghela (PW-71 : Ex.395). ... The panchnama (Ex.446) of collection of the natural signature of A-2 is proved by the Panch-Mukeshbhai Natwarlal Marwadi (PW-75:Ex.445) and recovery of specimen handwriting of A-2 under Panchnama (Ex.448) is proved by Panch-Dineshbhai Chunaji Parmar (PW- 76:Ex.447). ... It was also observed in the case of Ajay#HL_EN....

Tarachand s/o Dharmu Rathod vs State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau

2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 1517 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Ajay Ratansingh Parmar, 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 531, in which the learned Single Judge of this Court in paragraph No.9 held as under:- “9. ...... ... Ajay Ratansingh Parmar – 2022 SCC Online Bom 531 has been cited, wherein under similar circumstances, this Court has held that for the post of Assistant Police Inspector, the Director General of Police is the appointing and removing authority and the sanction accorded by the Police Commissioner is defective

Kailas Ramdas Sangle vs State of Maharashtra

2025 Supreme(Bom) 625 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN

Ajay Ratansingh Parmar, 2022 ALL MR (Cri.) 2140. It would be apposite to extract the observations made by the learned Single Judge in para 14, 15 and 16, which read as under:- “14.

STATE OF GUJARAT V/s VITTHALBHAI PUNJABHAI VANKAR

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 43 • India - High Court of Gujarat

MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO, J

10.2 The prosecution has examined PW-4 Ishwarsinh Ratansinh Gohil at Exh.23 and PW-5 Bhailalbhai Bhulabhai Vankar atExh.28. ... 10.5 the prosecution has examined PW-8 Ashwinbhai Babubhai Parmar at Exh.32 and the witness is the husband of the sister of the deceased. ... In light of the above, the evidence produced by the prosecution on record is appreciated and the prosecution has examined PW-1 Ramesh Chandra Dhaya Bhai Parmar at Exh.16. ... 10.4 The prosecution has examined PW-7 Sanjay Dahyabhai Parmar at Exh.31 and t....

Ramkali (Smt. ) (Dead) By LRs Anand Kishore Shukla VS Murit Kumari (Dead) By LRs Gopal Krishan Pandey

2022 0 Supreme(MP) 196 • India - Madhya Pradesh

DWARKADHISH BANSAL

Suma Devi and others AIR 2013 HP 4; (xii) Nathasingh Ratansingh Raghuvanshi v. Jagannathsingh Maharajsingh Raghuvanshi 1994 M.P.L.J 209; (xiii) Govinda v. Kanhai 1961 JLJ 1263; (xiv) Surinder Singh Ahluwalia v. Smt. ... Jagadish Kalita and others (2004) 1 SCC 271; (vi) Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan (2012) 12 SCC 406; (vii) Ram Prasad Rajak v. Nand Kumar & Bros and another (1998) 6 SCC 748; (viii) Veerayee Ammal v.

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?