AI Overview...
-
Ankush Ashok Kamble - Multiple references indicate he is involved in criminal proceedings, including charges under sections 201, 302, 306, and 498-A IPC. He was prosecuted alongside relatives such as Kamlabai Kamble and others, with allegations related to murder, conspiracy, and related offenses ANKUSH s/o RAMRAO KAMBLE VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Ankush s/o. Ramrao Kamble VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
-
Evidence and Witness Testimony - Witnesses like PW4 Narayan Ingale, PW2 Rajendra Ranmale, and PW5 Ankush Katkar provided consistent testimonies regarding police investigations and the possession of weapons (e.g., chopper, pager) by the accused. Some witnesses, such as PW4 Rajendra Dayanand Kambli and PW5 Rajendra Ramchandra Bodye, testified about recovery of ornaments and other evidence, though some witnesses turned hostile Ashok Ananda Kamble VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, State of Maharashtra VS Dilip Ankush Narvekar - Bombay.
-
Specific Incidents - The sources mention incidents involving Ankush, including a case where he was involved in a physical assault with a Sattur weapon, resulting in injury to Madhukar, and being present during police investigations and recovery procedures Ankush Nivrutti Ghorpode & others VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
-
Court Proceedings and Judgments - The references include judicial orders, such as the bail release of co-accused Ashok Bhikaji Vairage, and appellate court observations that benefited Ankush, indicating ongoing legal scrutiny and some favorable findings for him based on procedural or evidentiary grounds SATISH ANKUSH KAMBLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Bombay, Anant Dyaneshwar Jadhav VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
-
Additional Context - The sources also describe the social and familial background of Ankush, his residence, and interactions with police and witnesses, providing a comprehensive view of the case proceedings and evidence against him MUKINDA s/o RAMA KAMBLE VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Kerappa Narayan Bhuse VS The State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Ankush Ashok Kamble appears as a key accused in multiple criminal cases involving serious offenses such as murder and conspiracy. The evidence includes witness testimonies, police recovery procedures, and judicial orders. Some witnesses turned hostile, and court rulings have at times favored Ankush, possibly on procedural grounds. Overall, the sources depict a complex legal scenario with substantial evidence against him, but also some judicial leniency or procedural benefits ANKUSH s/o RAMRAO KAMBLE VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Anant Dyaneshwar Jadhav VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
References:
- Court orders and judgments: INDBOM00000014989, 00400054961
- Witness testimonies and police evidence: 00400054419, 00400018335, 00400009089
- Case details and background: 00400025870, 00400026045, 00400034179
Search Results for "Ankush Ashok Kamble"
2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1149 • India - Bombay
A.M.BADAR
As can be seen from the prosecution evidence, panch witnesses - PW1 Pandurang Mahadik and PW5 has also deposed on the same lines as that of PW4 Narayan Ingale, PW2 Rajendra Ranmale and PW5 Ankush Katkar. ... PW2 Rajendra Ranmale and PW5 Ankush Katkar, at the relevant time, were attached to Bhoiwada Police Station as Detection Officers. Their evidence is consistent with evidence of PW4 Narayan Ingale, Senior Police Inspector. ... As per his evidence, accused Gopal Shetty was found to be possessing a chopper and a pager, accused no.1 Ashok ....
2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 2062 • India - Bombay
S.P.KUKDAY, S.B.DESHMUKH
. - Appellant-Ankush Ramrao Kamble and his paternal aunt-Kamlabai Anandrao Kamble (original accused No.2) were prosecuted for offences punishable under sections 201, 302, 306 and 498-A read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "the IPC"). ... On 28th September, 2002, friends of appellant Ashok Dhondiram Sagar and Satish Bhaurao Mane (DW 5) informed complainant at about 8.00 p.m. that her daughter committed suicide. ... On receipt of this information, the appellant, his friends Vivek Khare and Ash....
2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 2060 • India - Bombay
S.B.DESHMUKH, S.P.KUKDAY
Appellant-Ankush Ramrao Kamble and his paternal aunt-Kamlabai Anandrao Kamble original accused No.2) were prosecuted for offences punishable under sections 201, 302, 306 and 498-A read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "the IPC"). ... On 28th September, 2002, friends of appellant Ashok Dhondiram Sagar and Satish Bhaurao Mane (D.W.5) informed complainant at about 8.00 p.m. that her daughter committed suicide. ... On receipt of this information, the appellant, his friends Vivek Khare and Ashok#H....
• India - Bombay High Court
M. S. KARNIK, J
Learned counsel for the applicant invited my attention to the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandhrpur while releasing the co-accused Ashok Bhikaji Vairage on bail.
2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 2068 • India - Bombay
S.P.KUKDAY, S.B.DESHMUKH
To the north of the house of Ankush are the houses of Dashrath, Murdlidhar and Chandrakant. House of Dnyanoba Nivrutti Kamble (accused No.5) is opposite the house of Ankush, on the other side of the road. At the time of the incident construction of the house of Ankush was in progress. ... Briefly stated the prosecution case is that complainant-Dashrath (PW 8), Murlidhar, Chandrakant @ Kant, Pandurang and Ankush (PW 4) are sons of Ranubai Maruti Kamble (PW 6). Ranubai lives with #HL_STA....
2005 0 Supreme(Bom) 790 • India - Bombay
R.C.CHAVAN, V.G.PALSHIKAR
W. 4 -Rajendra Dayanand Kambli and P. W. 5 Rajendra ramchandra Bodye, who are the witnesses on the point of recovery of golden ornaments of Dipika, at the instance of accused, have turned hostile. ... W. 1 Ashok admitted that two cases of assault were filed against him. P. W. 1 Ashok admitted that accused is B. Sc. B. Ed, and is having house in front of S. T. stand, Malvan. ... W. 1-Ashok), to inform the complainant, P. W. 1-Ashok and kode, it took about 25 minutes to return to the house of the accused.....
2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 730 • India - Bombay
B.H.MARLAPALLE, A.A.SAYED
, Ashok Shinde closed the main door of the house from inside. ... Ashok Shinde left the wada at 1 a.m. and reached the police station at Mohol and lodged his complaint at about 7 a.m. on 22/8/1990 ... PW 3 – Ashok Shinde asked them not to abuse and go back to their respective homes and at this time stone pelting started and, therefore ... To prove that the Wada where the incident had taken place had electric power supply at the time of the incident, the prosecution examined PW 1 – Nivrutti Kamble, PW 16 – Vithal #HL_STAR....
1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 602 • India - Bombay
V.K.BARDE, N.P.CHAPALGAONKER
The accused-Ankush was having Sattur and he hit Madhukar on left leg with Sattur. Madhukar received bleeding injury. ... The accused No. 1-Ankush Nivrutti Ghorpade, accused No. 2-Umrao Shivaji Ghorpade and accused No. 3-Devidas Dama Ghorpade are sentenced ... Prosecution has examined Gautam Kamble (P.W. 7) Exh. 41. He is the panch witness with respect to the panchanamas regarding recovery of weapons. He has stated that he and the other panch were called in Police Station. Accused Ankush was there. ... He asked accused #H....
2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1542 • India - Bombay
A.A.SAYED, SARANG V.KOTWAL
Even a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ankush s/o. Munjaji Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2005 ALL MR (Cri) 2624, had given benefit of their findings to the accused who had not preferred any Appeal. ... Sunanda Pandurang Pawar, resident of Mumbai, TalukaLoha, District-Nanded, she should be entitled to the benefit of our observations and findings, as recorded pursuant to the arguments advanced on behalf of appellant-accused No.1, Ankush Munjaji Pawar. ... Suryakant Baburao Kambale had conducted postmortem examinati....
2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2532 • India - High Court of Bombay
N.J. Jamadar, J
Filter by Legal Phrase
