AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Section 12(1) of the Passport Act, 1967 - This section empowers the government to suspend or revoke passports if it is deemed necessary to prevent unlawful activities, ensure security, or for other reasons specified under the Act. The section provides a legal basis for restricting a person's travel abroad, including cases involving custody disputes or violations of court orders general understanding from the Passport Act.

  • Bail and Court Proceedings - Several sources reference bail applications and judgments related to cases involving money circulation schemes, kidnapping, and contempt of court. Notably, in cases like ABC vs. ..., courts have ordered custody and passport restrictions, often citing violation of court orders or national security concerns Mughali VS State of Nagaland - Gauhati, Kiran Lohia vs State - Delhi, Saurov Kumar Mandal VS Madhura Das - Calcutta, Amanpreet Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) - Delhi, AMANPREET SINGH Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - Delhi, 2018_DHC_3736.

  • Court Orders and Passport Restrictions - Courts have ordered the seizure or restrictions on passports in custody disputes or cases involving illegal activities. For instance, in custody cases, the court has ordered passport seizure for a specified period (e.g., five years) to prevent international travel that might hinder custody arrangements or investigations Saurov Kumar Mandal VS Madhura Das - Calcutta.

  • Legal Precedents on Travel Restrictions - Prior to the Passport Act 1967, travel restrictions were not explicitly regulated; now, the Act provides a statutory framework for such restrictions, including in cases of contempt, custody, or criminal investigations Mughali VS State of Nagaland - Gauhati.

  • Main Points and Insights:

  • Section 12(1) of the Passport Act authorizes the government to restrict passports to prevent unlawful activities or protect court orders.
  • Courts have used this provision to restrict travel in custody disputes, criminal investigations, and cases involving illegal schemes.
  • Passport restrictions are often ordered alongside other judicial measures like bail, detention, or seizure of property general synthesis.

  • Analysis and Conclusion:

  • The judgment under Section 12(1) of the Passport Act is primarily a preventive measure used by courts and authorities to ensure compliance with legal proceedings, safeguard national security, or enforce custody orders.
  • Such restrictions are grounded in the statutory powers conferred by the Passport Act, which provides a legal framework for controlling international travel in specific cases.
  • Courts balance individual rights with public and judicial interests, often ordering passport restrictions in cases involving custody disputes, criminal investigations, or violations of court orders general understanding.

References: - Indian Passport Act, 1967, Section 12(1) - Various case references: ABC vs. ..., Delhi Bail Applications (2017, 2018), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. - Judicial judgments by Justice Anu Malhotra and others on related bail and passport restrictions.

Search Results for "Bail Judgment in Section 12 1 Abc of Passport Act"

Kiran Lohia VS State

2020 0 Supreme(Del) 77 India - Delhi

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

Section 361 IPC. ... The mother argued that the father's act amounted to kidnapping under Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). ... of kidnapping under Section 361 IPC. ... Aman Lohia, he is sentenced under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months along with a fine of Rs.2000/-." ... Further, in ABC vs. ... The relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereinb....

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon VS State of Maharashtra, through CBI , Bombay

2013 0 Supreme(SC) 270 India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM

Act - Section 4 - FIR – investigation - punishment - Masjid at Ayodhya was demolished on 06.12.1992. ... , 436, 201 - Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 19 - TADA (P) Act - Section ... We are of the view that exercise of power by the appropriate Government under sub-section (1) of Section 432 of the Code cannot be ... A perusal of the final judgment....

Mughali VS State of Nagaland

2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 759 India - Gauhati

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 384– National Security Act ... , 1980 – Section 3(1)(2)– Quashing and setting aside detention order – Remand to judicial custody – Petition under Article 226 of ... Section 161 statements are not considered substantive evidence, but can only be used to contradict the witness in the course of a trial. The same is clear from the wording of Section 162(1) of the Cr.P.C. and has been so held tim....

Kiran Lohia vs State

India - Delhi High Court

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2(b) and 2(c) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 360 and 361 - Child custody ... Aman Lohia, he is sentenced under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months along with a fine of Rs.2000/-." ... Further, in ABC vs. ... The relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereinbelow: "1.......The Registrar (Judicial) sha....

Saurov Kumar Mandal VS Madhura Das

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1099 India - Calcutta

KRISHNA RAO

application alleging that the respondent, the mother of their minor son, had violated the order passed by the court in a consent judgment ... 2017, and the order dated November 26, 2018, by not allowing the petitioner to have the custody as per the terms of the consent judgment ... 2017, and the order dated November 26, 2018, by not allowing the petitioner to have the custody as per the terms of the consent judgment ... It is also ordered that her passport would be seized for a period of five years. ... Case No. 158 of 2....

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA

2017 0 Supreme(SC) 772 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, S. A. BOBDE, R. K. AGRAWAL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, A. M. SAPRE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. ABDUL NAZEER

8(1)(j), Right to Information Act, 2005 and other Acts – Section 5, Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 – Section 26, Indian Post Office ... SCR 88 : 1950 Cri LJ 1383 – Distinguished ... (e) Interpretation – Judgment ... Prior to the enactment of the Passports Act, 1967, there was no law regulating the right to travel abroad as a result of which the order of the Passport Officer refusing a passport was held to be invali....

AMANPREET SINGH  vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

India - Delhi High Court

JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J. 1. ... The company was involved in the activity of money circulation as defined in Section 2C of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, and it is a banned activity under the said Act. ... It was also submitted by the State through the status report dated 31.10.2017 under signature of Virender Singh, the then ACP, Section-1, EOW, New Delhi that after the dismissal of the #HL_....

Amanpreet Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi)

India - Delhi High Court

ANU MALHOTRA

58A, 221, 233 read with Section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956. ... JUDGMENT Anu Malhotra, J. ... The company was involved in the activity of money circulation as defined in Section 2C of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, and it is a banned activity under the said Act. D. ... The Bail Application 2060/2017 & Bail Application 2070/2017 filed by the applicants thereof Amanpreet Singh and Inderpreet Singh both relate....

AMANPREET SINGH  Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2018 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2630 India - High Court of Delhi

58A, 221, 233 read with Section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956. ... The company was involved in the activity of money circulation as defined in Section 2C of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, and it is a banned activity under the said Act. ... The Bail Application 2060/2017 & Bail Application 2070/2017 filed by the applicants thereof Amanpreet Singh and Inderpreet Singh both relate to the allegations levelled against them qua FIR No.#H....

AMANPREET SINGH  vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

India - Delhi High Court

JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J. 1. ... The company was involved in the activity of money circulation as defined in Section 2C of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, and it is a banned activity under the said Act. ... It was also submitted by the State through the status report dated 31.10.2017 under signature of Virender Singh, the then ACP, Section-1, EOW, New Delhi that after the dismissal of the #HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top