AI Overview...
- Bharat Battery Manufacturing - Supply of Lead Acid Batteries with Price Variation Clause Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. - Madhya Pradesh, Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. - Supreme Court, BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT. LTD VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi
- Main points: Bharat Battery submitted detailed unit price calculations for lead acid batteries, referencing Hindustan Zinc Price Circulars. They offered revised prices in response to tenders, leading to the execution of rate contracts (e.g., No. AM-5/RC-14100105/072003/WT/BTYS/DEF/2003-04/75) for the period 2003-2004. The batteries supplied included 6V 170 AH and 12V 75 AH models, with specific charges for transportation from Shalimar Railway Station Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. - Madhya Pradesh, Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. - Supreme Court, BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT. LTD VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi.
-
Insights: The company consistently provided detailed cost calculations aligned with price variation clauses, indicating transparency and adherence to contractual terms. The rate contracts established fixed prices for specified periods, which are referenced in legal and contractual contexts.
-
Legal Proceedings and Court Judgments involving Bharat Battery BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, Dharmendra Singh VS Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VS DHANURDHAR CHAMPATIRAY - Supreme Court, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VS DHANURDHAR CHAMPATIRAY - Supreme Court, M. J. Engineering Works (P)Ltd. VS Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh
- Main points: Bharat Battery was involved in legal cases, including a notable Supreme Court decision (2007 SCC 684), where the Court examined disputes related to contractual obligations, pricing, and arbitration procedures. The Court referenced Bharat Battery’s detailed cost submissions and upheld contractual and procedural provisions, emphasizing the importance of arbitration in resolving disputes.
- Insights: The legal rulings underscore the significance of detailed cost documentation submitted by Bharat Battery and affirm the enforceability of contractual clauses, including price variation mechanisms. The Court's references to Bharat Battery’s submissions highlight the company's role in contractual disputes and resolutions.
Analysis and Conclusion: Bharat Battery Manufacturing has been actively engaged in supplying lead acid batteries under government and defense contracts, with detailed pricing based on price variation clauses. Their documentation and offers have been subject to judicial scrutiny, reaffirming the importance of transparent cost calculations and contractual adherence. The legal cases, especially the Supreme Court judgment, reinforce the contractual framework within which Bharat Battery operates, including arbitration and dispute resolution mechanisms. Overall, Bharat Battery’s activities reflect a consistent pattern of contractual compliance, detailed pricing strategies, and involvement in legal proceedings that uphold their operational and contractual integrity.
References: - Contract and supply details: Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. - Madhya Pradesh, Union of India VS Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. - Supreme Court, BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT. LTD VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi - Legal judgments: Dharmendra Singh VS Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VS DHANURDHAR CHAMPATIRAY - Supreme Court, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VS DHANURDHAR CHAMPATIRAY - Supreme Court, M. J. Engineering Works (P)Ltd. VS Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh
Search Results for "Bharat Battery Manufacturing"
2007 0 Supreme(MP) 808 • India - Madhya Pradesh
H.K.SEMA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
The respondent also submitted detailed calculation of unit price of battery as per price variation clause and the photocopies of Hindustan Zinc Price Circular. ... A.M - 5/RC-14100105/072003/WT/BTYS/Defence/2003-04/7 5 for supply of battery secondary lead acid, an offer dated 7.10.2002 was submitted which was revised by letter dated 8.4.2003. ... On the basis of the revised offer dated 8.4.2003 a rate contract No.AM-5/RC-14100105/072003/WT/ BTYS/DEF/2003-04/75/BHARAT/COAC/185 dated 5.5.2003 for the period 5.5.2003 to 16.3.2004 was execute....
2007 5 Supreme 934 • India - Supreme Court
H.K.SEMA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
A.M-5/RC-14100105/072003/ WT/ BTYS/ Defence/ 2003-04/ 75 for supply of battery secondary lead acid, an offer dated 7.10.2002 was ... The respondent also submitted detailed calculation of unit price of battery as per price variation clause and the photocopies of ... AM-5/RC-14100105/ 072003/ WT/ BTYS/ DEF/ 2003-04/ 75/ BHARAT/ COAC/ 185 dated 5.5.2003 for the period 5.5.2003 to 16.3.2004 was executed ... The respondent also submitted detailed calculation of unit price of battery as per price variation clause and the photo....
2002 0 Supreme(Del) 1467 • India - Delhi
C.K.MAHAJAN
If we are to despatch any consignment of batteries from Shalimar Railway Station which is 20 kms. from our factory, then we shall charge Rs. 5/- extra for each battery. ... If we are to despatch any consignment of batteries from Shalimar Railway Station which is 20 kms. from our factory, then we shall charge Rs. 5/- extra for each battery. ... PE-4/am-7/rc-0983/mt Batteries/defence/84- 85/77/e-3/bharat/015/coac dated 29th September, 1984. Clauses 4 and 5 of the schedule b attached to the aforesaid rate contract provided as under : ... "....
2001 0 Supreme(Del) 1022 • India - Delhi
VUENDER JAIN, VIJENDER JAIN
Delhi High Court ... (August 10, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125489 ... 2001-DRJ-59-697 ... BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs.
2006 0 Supreme(Del) 976 • India - Delhi
A.K.SINHA
While supplying the batteries petitioner submitted detailed calculation of unit price of battery as per price variation clause and the photocopies of Hindustan Zinc Price Circular. ... AM-5/rc-14100105/072003/wt BTYS/def/2003- 04/75/bharat/coac/185 dated 5. 5. 2003 for the period 5. 5. 2003 to 16. 3. 2004 was executed between the petitioner and the respondent. ... AM-5/rc-14100105/072003/wt/btys/defence/2003-04/75 for supply of battery secondary lead acid, an offer dated 7. 10. 2002 was submitted which was revised by letter dated 8. 4. 20....
2018 0 Supreme(Del) 2473 • India - Delhi
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
The said letter reads as under: ... “To ... M/s The Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. ... 238 A, Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Road, ... Kolkota-700020. ... AM-5/RC-14100105/07200/WT Btys/Def/2003-04/75/ Bharat/COIAC/185 dated 5.5.2003 on you. ... Ref: Your letter No. 271/820/2004-2005 dated 28.6.04. ... The batteries were “secondary lead acid portable” of 6V 170 AH and 12V 75AH, for which the Respondent quoted a price of Rs. 2070 and Rs.1871 per battery respectively. The supplies were for Defen....
2014 0 Supreme(MP) 765 • India - Madhya Pradesh
ALOK ARADHE
Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 684; ACE Pipeline Contracts (P) Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. ... Ltd., (2007) 5 SCC 304; Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and another v. ... Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the Chief Engineer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited to appoint ... Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 684, and in Deep Trading Company (supra). In ACE Pipeli....
2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1833 • India - Supreme Court
AFTAB ALAM, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. ... Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. [2007 (7) SCC 684]. In view of the difference of opinion of the two coordinate benches of this Court, the matter was referred to a three-Judge Bench in the case of Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway v. ... Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, (2007) 5 SCC 304, this Court went to observe that : ... "But in sub-section (6), where, the procedure has already been agree....
2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1831 • India - Supreme Court
TARUN CHATTERJEE, AFTAB ALAM
Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. ... Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. [2007 (7) SCC 684]. In view of the difference of opinion of the two coordinate benches of this Court, the matter was referred to a three-Judge Bench in the case of Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway v. ... Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, (2007) 5 SCC 304, this Court went to observe that : ... "But in sub-section (6), where, the procedure has already been agree....
2008 0 Supreme(MP) 1001 • India - Madhya Pradesh
K.K.LAHOTI
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in Bharat Battery Mfg. Co. ... In the light of aforesaid factual position, the legal position as settled by the Apex Court in Bharat Battery Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. (supra) may be looked into, thus: 12. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punj Lloyd Ltd. v. ... Bharat Battery Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 684 and submitted that to decide the dispute between the parties, an arbitrator may be appointed. ... ( 6. ) TO apprec....
Filter by Legal Phrase
