DNA Test as a Scientific and Accurate Evidence: Multiple sources emphasize that DNA testing is considered a scientifically accurate and reliable method for forensic identification and establishing biological relationships. Courts have acknowledged DNA evidence as a predominant forensic technique, with some references explicitly stating that DNA tests are practically accurate and an exact science (Kishan Lal @ Champa Yadav, Son of Shri Mahruram VS State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Ghumka, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) - Chhattisgarh, Mahesh VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Ajitkumar Kumarsinh Bhagora VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Patan Mohammad Rafi VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court, Rajli @ Rajjo VS Kapoor Singh - Punjab and Haryana).
Limitations of Hair Evidence: Hair evidence, in contrast, is generally considered less reliable for definitive identification. The sources do not directly compare hair and DNA, but the emphasis on DNA's scientific accuracy suggests hair evidence would not match the reliability of DNA testing in forensic contexts.
Legal Recognition of DNA Evidence: Courts have upheld the validity and importance of DNA evidence, noting that even if not infallible, it remains a strong foundation for conviction. The courts have also clarified that DNA test results should not be discarded solely based on procedural lapses unless procedural errors undermine the evidence's integrity (Ajitkumar Kumarsinh Bhagora VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, VIJAN MANDAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court, Rajli @ Rajjo VS Kapoor Singh - Punjab and Haryana).
Procedural and Handling Concerns: While procedural lapses in sample collection can undermine DNA evidence, the general consensus remains that DNA testing, when properly conducted, is highly reliable. The importance of following proper procedures is recognized, but it does not diminish the scientific accuracy of DNA tests (VIJAN MANDAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court).
The collected sources consistently affirm that DNA testing is a scientifically accurate and reliable forensic tool, superior to traditional evidence like hair, which lacks the same level of definitive identification capability. Courts have relied heavily on DNA evidence in criminal cases, acknowledging its precision and scientific basis.
Hair evidence, by comparison, is less accurate and often insufficient for conclusive identification, especially in complex forensic scenarios. The emphasis on DNA's reliability underscores its dominance in forensic investigations over hair evidence.
Therefore, DNA tests are deemed more accurate than hair evidence for establishing biological relationships or guilt, with courts recognizing DNA as a near-absolute forensic standard when properly collected and analyzed.
References:
him are acquitted of said charge – Appellant is reported to be in jail direct he shall be released from jail forthwith custody is not ... Additional Sessions whereby he has been convicted for offence – Held, Learned trial Court is fully unjustified in convicting appellant DNA ... The said judgment has not held that DNA test is to be ignored. In fact, this Court has taken note of the fact that DNA test is scientifically accurate. ... The Court relied ....
AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE INVESTIGATION, WHEN IT WAS TRANSPIRED THAT, EVEN FROM THE DNA REPORT THE PROFILE MATCHED WITH THE ACCUSED ... The said judgment has not held that DNA test is to be ignored. In fact, this Court has taken note of the fact that DNA test is scientifically accurate. ... The Court relied on the DNA test holding the DNA test to be scientifically accurate. The per....
in holding that mere negative report of DNA would not mean one should discard the oral testimony of prosecutrix – Trial Court was ... test confirmed that none of the two appellants was the biological father of the child delivered by prosecutrix – Trial Court erred ... not supposed to make altogether a different case than the one put forward by prosecution – Conviction was liable to be set aside ... It is also not the case of the prosecution that the DNA test report is....
It is also not the case of the prosecution that the DNA test report is not accurate or no implicit reliance should be placed upon the same by this Court. The Supreme Court in Santosh Kumar Singh v. ... State, 2010 (9) SCC 747 has observed that the DNA is practically accurate and exact science and that the Court would not be justified in rejecting the DNA report. The DNA evidence is now a predominant forensic techni....
being the author of crime becomes impossible (Para 31) ... (ii) DNA ... It is nobody’s case that the result of the DNA test is not genuine and, therefore, we have to proceed on an assumption that the result of the DNA test is accurate. The DNA test reports show that the appellant is not the biological father of the girl-child. ... Given that the Earth’s population is about 5 billion, this test ....
11, 39) ... ... (B) Evidentiary Value - The court emphasized that statements under Section 164 of CrPC are not ... The DNA report's validity was undermined due to procedural lapses in sample collection and handling. ... minor, including rape and abortion - The trial court's reliance on the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 of CrPC and DNA ... The said judgment has not held that DNA test is to be ignored. In fact, this Court has taken note of the fact that DNA#HL....
report – Evidentiary value – DNA test, even if not infallible, is nearly an accurate scientific evidence which can be a strong foundation ... by innocent only – However, it would be a misconception to make a cost-benefit comparison between cost to society owing to acquittal ... DNA evidence using established STR technique has proved that appellant committed sexual intercourse with deceased – Deceased has ... State of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 5 SCC 509, this Court has unequivocally held th....
are authorities for the proposition that if the evidence is proved by circumstantial evidence, ordinarily, death penalty would not ... sexual abuse cases, the Parliament in their wisdom enhanced the minimum sentence for the aggravated penetrative sexual assault to not ... We must, therefore, accept the DNA report as being scientifically accurate and an exact science as held by this Court in Kamti Devi v. Poshi Ram (supra). ... The result of a genuine DNA test is said to be scientifical....
45, 66) ... ... (D) Medical Examination - Procedures outlined in Sections 53A and 164A of CrPC not ... followed properly, leading to doubt over the integrity of DNA samples collected. ... 2012 - Section 4 - Appeal against conviction for rape - The trial court convicted the appellant based on the child's statement and DNA ... The said judgment has not held that DNA test is to be ignored. In fact, this Court has taken note of the fact that DNA test i....
... DNA Test--Obtaining of samples forcefully--This will not violate ... It does not matter that some one is going to lose, certainly the DNA test for establishing the paternity is a necessity. ... (Para 23) ... (C) Evidence Act, 1872--DNA Test--Held; that it is not ... There are clear cut circumstances which necessitate the investigation by way of DNA test which is an accurate....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.