AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Consumer surplus, as elucidated in the sources, refers to the extra benefit or value consumers derive from goods or services beyond what they pay, especially when there is a deficiency in service or additional consumer-related factors like inconvenience or mental tension. The concept is applied across various sectors—medical, hospitality, power supply—and is integral to assessing consumer rights, compensation, and service quality under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It emphasizes the recognition of both material and non-material benefits or burdens experienced by consumers.

Search Results for "Consumer Surplus"

J. S. Paul VS A. Barkataki

India - Consumer

A.S.RANGAD, N.S.SINGH, RAMESH BAWRI

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 12 and 17 — Medical negligence — String of the Multiload C.U. 250 (Copper T) broke when ... This second aspect was christened as ‘Consumer Surplus’ by the National Commission. ... deficiency in the service rendered by the service provider, in proven cases — in other words, the Consumer Surplus. ... Act under the pretext of being a consumer. in our view, however, in such cases although a consumer is not entitled to be compensate....

J. S. Paul VS A. Barkataki

India - Consumer

RAMESH BAWRI, A.S.RANGAD, N.S.SINGH

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Sections 12 and 17 - Medical negligence - String of the Multiload C.U. 250(Copper T) broke when opp ... deficiency in the service rendered by the service provider, in proven cases - in other words, the Consumer Surplus. ... Mulchand Aganval & Anr.9, the National Commission has held that deficiency in service has two aspects -(i) claim for the amount of actual loss and -Iii) damages for inconvenience, harassment and mental tension This second aspect was christened as Consumer Surplu....

B.  DATTA, SENIOR ADVOCATE VS MANAGEMENT OF STATE OWNED ASHOKA HOTEL

India - Consumer

K.S.GUPTA, RAJYALAKSHMI RAO

the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act to a complaint against a hotel for the theft of a car from its premises. ... Consumer Protection Act - Hotel Services - Section 2(1)(o), Section 2(1)(d)(ii), Section 2(I)(d)(ii) - Summary: The court discussed ... Issues: The main issue was the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act to the complaint against the hotel for the theft ... This second aspect is what we call consumer factor or consumer component or consumer sur....

Hotel Hyatt Regency VS Atul Virmani

India - Consumer

P.D.SHENOY, R.C.JAIN

Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 12 and 17—Deficiency in service of Five Star Hotel in providing vehicle parking service—Vehicle ... services were not free because they were more than made up by exorbitant rental charges—Disclaimer was in very small letters and consumer ... Mulchand Agarwal and another1 wherein it was held as follows: ... “Keeping in view the aspect of ‘consumer factor’ or ‘consumer component’ of ‘consumer surplus’ as aforementioned we are of the opinion that M....

BOMBAY BRAZZERIE VS MULCHAND AGARWAL

India - Consumer

D.P.WADHWA, B.K.TAIMNI, J.K.MEHRA

Hotel Liability - Consumer Protection - Contract Act, 1872 - [Hotel Liability] - [Consumer Protection] - [Chapter IX, Section ... The court also considered the consumer component, awarding compensation for mental tension, harassment, and inconvenience caused ... This second aspect is what we call consumer factor or consumer component or consumer surplus like the present one. Consumer component may not be present in every contract. It would depend upo....

Ashok Roy VS Bhubaneswar Development Authority

India - Consumer

AJIT BHARIHOKE

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d), 21(b) — Consumer — Revision — Allotted surplus LIG plots to prospective buyers on ... as envisaged under S. 2(1)(d) of the Act and he not entitled to maintain consumer complaint. ... there being any allotment of service to be given by opposite party in furtherance of aforesaid agreement — HELD — Petitioner not consumer ... Briefly stated the facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that respondent opposite party decided to allotted #HL....

Taj Mahal Hotel VS United India Insurance Company Ltd.

India - Consumer

M.SHREESHA

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 19 – Insurance- Second Complainant (hereinafter referred to as “the car owner”) insured his ... The plea that no separate fee is charged for the parking and hence one of the ingredients of being a “Consumer” within the meaning ... the Complainant had dinner at their Hotel and with such an effectual consideration the question of whether the car owner is a ‘consumer ... This second aspect is what we call consumer factor or consumer component or consumer#HL....

Shamlal Ramlal Changoiwala VS Mukund Jagannath Bhusari

India - Consumer

B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR

Likewise, he may also invest his surplus funds in purchase of one or more houses, which is/are proposed to be constructed by the ... However, if certain surplus funds are invested by a person once a while, in certain deposits, purchase of shares etc., such a person ... Ltd. in which, it was observed as follows:- ... “A person having surplus ... However, if certain surplus funds are invested by a person once a while, in certain deposits, purchase of shares etc., such a person does get covered under the category of ‘#HL....

Surya Energy Photo Voltaic India Pvt.  Ltd.  VS State of Karnataka

2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 801 India - Karnataka

S.SUJATHA

Commission's reasons for not approving the PPAs, which included the impact on thermal power stations and the financial burden on consumers ... Commission for not approving the PPAs were valid, considering the impact on thermal power stations and the financial burden on consumers ... Commission's reasons for not approving the PPAs, which included the impact on thermal power stations and the financial burden on consumers ... The Commission taking into account the consumer interest qua the surplus availabi....

Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills LTD.  VS M. P. Electricity Board

1988 0 Supreme(SC) 576 India - Supreme Court

L.M.SHARMA, A.P.SEN

If the consumer having own generating set(s) can have, as a result of additional generation reasonable in the opinion of the Divisional Engineer of the Board having jurisdiction. energy, surplus to his requirement, the Divisional Engineer may direct him to supply the surplus to the Board or to another ... Under Clause 4 of the Generation Order, which reads as follows, jurisdiction was vested in the Divisional Engineer of the Board to direct a consumer having Captive source of power to supply electricity to the Board or t....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top