AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Daughter's Rights in Coparcener Property - The sources indicate that daughters, as coparceners in a Hindu undivided family (HUF), have legal rights to property inherited from their father. Courts recognize their entitlement to shares in ancestral property, and issues of forgery or breach of trust involving daughters are often examined under criminal breach of trust, forgery, and property laws Kantilal Maganlal Shah VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, Harshadbhai Matilal Patel VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat.

  • Legal Provisions and Case Law - The Hindu Succession Act and the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 482) are pivotal in asserting daughters' rights. Section 482 empowers courts to quash proceedings if they are abuse of process or without merit, which can include disputes over coparcener rights. Several cases highlight that daughters, even illegitimate ones or those claiming maintenance, are entitled to property rights and maintenance from coparcener assets Pavitri VS Katheesumma - Kerala.

  • Specific Judicial Interpretations - Courts have held that property held by a coparcener is for the benefit of all coparceners, including daughters. The amendment to laws like the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act clarifies that property held by a coparcener is for the benefit of the entire family, reinforcing daughters' rights Niharika Jain VS Union of India - Rajasthan, RAMDHAN MEENA S/O REWAD MAL MEENA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Rajasthan.

  • Disputes and Evidence - Cases involving forgery, adverse possession, and property transfer disputes often involve the question of whether daughters or other coparceners have legitimate claims. Evidence such as handwriting expert reports and property records are used to establish ownership and rights Kantilal Maganlal Shah VS State of Gujarat - Crimes.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Under the Hindu law framework, daughters as coparceners have recognized legal rights to ancestral and coparcener property. The Criminal Procedure Code Section 482 provides a mechanism for the courts to protect these rights by quashing frivolous or malicious proceedings. Judicial decisions affirm that property held by a coparcener is for the benefit of all coparceners, including daughters, and that disputes over such rights are subject to criminal and civil law scrutiny. Therefore, daughters' rights in coparcener property are well-established, and legal remedies are available to uphold their entitlements Kantilal Maganlal Shah VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, Pavitri VS Katheesumma - Kerala, Niharika Jain VS Union of India - Rajasthan.

Search Results for "Criminal Procedure Code s 482 Daughter s Right in Coparcener Property"

Harshadbhai Matilal Patel VS State Of Gujarat

2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1067 India - Gujarat

GITA GOPI

The complainant claimed that he was a coparcener of the ancestral property of his grandfather and that the accused had cheated and ... caused him criminal breach of trust. ... mother, sister, and cousin brother, alleging forgery of signature on a notice served under Section 135D of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code ... Survey no.54 as well as PPF account continued to be the property of Matilal Motilal Patel HUF of which Respondent No.2 is coparcener. ... Both the petitions being ....

Pavitri VS Katheesumma

1959 0 Supreme(Ker) 8 India - Kerala

KOSHI, VAIDIALINGAM

Illegitimate Daughter - Maintenance from Putative Father's Assets - Mohammadan Law - S.488 of the Crl. P. ... C. - General Law Fact of the Case: The case involved a dispute over the entitlement of an illegitimate daughter of a ... The plaintiff, an illegitimate daughter, sought recovery of arrears of maintenance from the defendants, who were the heirs of her ... The learned judge says that the father being bound to maintain his illegitimate daughter, the coparceners who take his property#HL_E....

Kantilal Maganlal Shah VS State of Gujarat

India - Crimes

DIVYESH A. JOSHI

by applicant who happens to be her real brother – She, being a coparcener in property, is legally entitled to get her share from ... 482Criminal breach of trust, cheating and forgery – Dispute involved in present case is with regard to ancestral property of ... inherited property of her father – Elements of forgery exist in present case – Opinion of Handwriting Expert is also on record, ... Ahuja further submits that the complainant, being a daughter, is legally en....

Dropadi Devi VS Shiv Chandra Dixit

2020 0 Supreme(All) 253 India - Allahabad

JASPREET SINGH

Criminal Law – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 145, 146 – Plaintiffs-appellants instituted suit ... cancellation of will deed as well as sale deed in Court of Munsif, which was registered – Pleadings were that house is Joint Hindu Family Property ... cancellation of will deed as well as sale deed in Court of Munsif, which was registered – Pleadings were that house is Joint Hindu Family Property ... Joint Hindu Family Property, nor his daughter Smt. ... Hindu Succession Act h....

Dropadi Devi VS Shiv Chandra Dixit

India - Current Civil Cases

JASPREET SINGH

also could not be established by him and that it has been held that defendant is exclusive owner of entire property – Possession ... setup any plea of adverse possession rather he only claimed that he had some share in property in question and moreover that share ... ) (B) Limitation Act, 1963 – Article 65 – Adverse possession – Once defendant acquired exclusive title of property ... Joint Hindu Family Property, nor his daughter Smt. ... Hindu Succession Act his wife and daughter alone....

Niharika Jain VS Union of India

2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1137 India - Rajasthan

VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 - Section 24 - Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property bein....

RAMDHAN MEENA S/O REWAD MAL MEENA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

India - High Court Of Rajasthan

VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA

First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... The text of the amendment itself clearly provides that t....

RATAN SIROHI S/O SHRI GOPAL KISHAN SIROHI Vs DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (BENAMI TRANSACTION) AND INITIATING OFFICER

India - High Court Of Rajasthan

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

property had been purchased for the benefit of the wife of the unmarried daughter. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for t....

RAMDHAN MEENA S/O REWAD MAL MEENA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

India - High Court Of Rajasthan

VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA

property had been purchased for the benefit of the wife of the unmarried daughter. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for t....

DR. RAM SINGH YADAV @ RAMU RAM @ RAMU YADAV S/O LATE SH. BRAJ LAL ALIAS VIRDHI CHAND YADAV, Vs UNION OF INDIA

India - High Court Of Rajasthan

VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA

First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... First was in respect of the person in whose name the property is held being a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family and the property being held for the benefit of the coparceners of the family. ... The text of the amendment itself clearly provides that t....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top