SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JASPREET SINGH
Dropadi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Chandra Dixit – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mohd.Aslam Khan and Ashish Srivastava, Advocates
For the Respondent:Amit Jaiswal, Brijesh Kr. Saxena and Brijesh Kumar, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Jaspreet Singh, J.—Heard Sri Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Senior Advocate along with Sri Deepankar Kumar and Mohd. Aslam Khan for the appellants and Sri B.K. Saxena, learned Counsel along with Sri Amit Jaiswal, Ms. Shreya Saxena and Sri Utkarsh Srivastava, for the respondents.

2. The instant second appeal has been preferred against the concurrent judgment and decree passed by the two courts below whereby the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Court No. 24, Lucknow by means of its judgment and decree dated 08.10.2010 dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs-appellants and allowed the counter claim of the defendant-respondent. The aforesaid judgment and decree has been affirmed by the First Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No. 155 of 2010 by A.D.J., Court No. 2, Lucknow by means of its judgment and decree dated 05.02.2014, while dismissing the appeal.

3. The aforesaid second appeal was admitted by means of the order dated 01.04.2014 on three substantial questions of law which shall be discussed later, while dealing with them. However, in order to appreciate the controversy involved in the above second appeal, certain brief facts giving rise to the instant appeal are bei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top