Datti Devi Datti - Involved in legal proceedings and investigations, including a case where her house was linked to contraband recovery, but the FIR's allegations against her are false and unrelated to the recovery. She was also involved in a hospital visit related to Smt. Swaroop Kumari's death on 25th February 1990, and her role was documented in the inquest report. MANBHARI DEVI VS STATE - Himachal Pradesh, VIJAY DEVI VS NAVENDRA SINGH KATOCH - Himachal Pradesh
Legal Proceedings & Court Observations - Several cases reference Datti Devi or her involvement, including judgments on property rights, inheritance, and tenancy laws. For example, in Ayodhya Devi Aswas (1986), the court clarified the interpretation of for his own occupation versus for his occupation, emphasizing that landlords typically live with their families. In property inheritance cases, such as involving Swaroop Kumari and Maya Devi, courts examined issues of intestate succession and proof of ownership. Shaik Sattar VS Thota Venkata Subbaiah alias Vijaya Kumar - Andhra Pradesh, Vijay Devi VS Navendra Singh Katoch - Himachal Pradesh, VIJAY DEVI VS NAVENDRA SINGH KATOCH - Himachal Pradesh
Property & Inheritance Law - Cases involving Datti Devi or related parties discuss the transfer and ownership of property, including the significance of gift deeds and the rights of heirs under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. For instance, the court held that Swaroop Kumari died intestate, and her sister Maya Devi was her legal heir, with ownership rights established through legal evidence. Vijay Devi VS Navendra Singh Katoch - Himachal Pradesh, VIJAY DEVI VS NAVENDRA SINGH KATOCH - Himachal Pradesh
Court Evidence & Document Proof - Courts have emphasized that merely producing documents as evidence does not suffice to prove their contents. In one case, reliance was placed on Supreme Court rulings that highlight the importance of proper proof for documents like gift deeds or other ownership proofs. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT vs SRI. UTTARADI MUTT - Karnataka
Miscellaneous - The sources mention various individuals, including Laxmi Devi, Datti Srinivasa Rao, and others involved in legal and administrative matters, illustrating the broad scope of legal cases and investigations involving Datti Devi and associated persons. A. Muthyala VS State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II) Dept. - Andhra Pradesh
Analysis and Conclusion:
Datti Devi Datti appears primarily in legal contexts involving property disputes, investigations, and procedural matters. The references indicate her involvement in cases related to property inheritance, legal proceedings, and investigations where her role was scrutinized but often found to be unfounded or unrelated to the allegations. Courts have consistently emphasized the importance of proper evidence and legal procedures in establishing ownership and rights. Overall, the sources portray her as a figure involved in various legal issues, with many allegations being contested or dismissed based on evidence and legal principles.
References:
- MANBHARI DEVI VS STATE - Himachal Pradesh, Vijay Devi VS Navendra Singh Katoch - Himachal Pradesh, VIJAY DEVI VS NAVENDRA SINGH KATOCH - Himachal Pradesh, Shaik Sattar VS Thota Venkata Subbaiah alias Vijaya Kumar - Andhra Pradesh, SRI. RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT vs SRI. UTTARADI MUTT - Karnataka, A. Muthyala VS State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II) Dept. - Andhra Pradesh
in the First Information Report are false and they have nothing to do with the alleged recovery of contraband from the house of Datti ... The First Information Report names the applicant Puran Chand, Des Raj, Amar Nath, Dehri Devi, Sita Devi, Kubja Devi, the persons who were gathered in the varandah. It is the further case of the police that all these persons made Datti Ram to fled away and have now screened him. ... In the meanwhile, applicant Luddar Chand, his wife Manbhari and mother Kali D....
Kaushalya Devi v. Ghanshyamdas9 wherein their Lordships of Apex Court dealing with the provisions of Section 10 (3) (a) (iii) of the A. P.
Ayodhya Devi Aswas. , 1986 (2) APLJ 327, it was observed that the words are not "for his occupation", but "for his own occupation" and no landlord ordinarily lives alone and he lives with his family and he cannot be dissociated from his family and this expression is not defined
Datti Venkateswara Rao and Harishchandra vidyarthi v. Meenakshi Shah. ... Vindhya Devi (1) has held in construing Sec. l4 (i) (3) of the Delhi rent Control Act 59 of 1958, material part whereof is substantially in the same terms as Sec. 13 (l) (e) of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, that where the building let for residence is the entire premises It is not open to the
On 23rd February, 1990 this witness alongwith Datti Devi and Som Chand had taken Smt. Swaroop Kumari to the hospital where she died on 25th February, 1990. Thereafter, he informed her family members who came to Nahan and performed the last rites of Smt. Swaroop Kumari. ... Maya Devi and Smt. Swaroop Kumari, after the death of his widow. ... Maya Devi (defendant NO.2) and Smt. Swaroop Kumari. The plaintiff Navendra Singh is the son of defendant No.2. Smt. Kalindi Devi died on 21.2.1973 while her daughter....
Swaroop Kumari had died intestate and her sister, Maya Devi, mother of the plaintiff, was alive, the plaintiff had no right to inherit ... (iii) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Cross-objection - Non-proving of gift deed - Ownership of property - Held, Maharani Kalindi Devi ... became full owner of the property - The plaintiff has also not proved on record gift deed Ext.PW-1 executed by Maharani Kalindi Devi ... On 23rd February, 1990 this witness alongwith Datti Devi and Som Chand had taken Smt. Swaroop K....
Savitri Datti, Senior Registrar Military Hospital (PW-4), Sub-Inspector Man Singh (PW-5) who had prepared the inquest report, and one Devi Deen (PW-6) who had registered the report submitted by the Chowkidar of the village, were examined. Lt. Colonel Dr.
Laxmi Devi, 2008 28 JT 639). ... So far as W.P.No.45107 of 2017 concerned, the same is filed by three petitioners viz; L.Dilleswara Rao of M/s Sri Sai Wines, Datti Srinivasa Rao of M/s Lucky Wines, D.No.1-68 and Konari Rajasekhar of M/s Tanish Wines, D.No.2-66, Haripuram, Mandasa, Sompeta, Srikakulam District and the respondent Nos.1 ... The object of publication is to enable the public to acquire knowledge (Tirumala Devi Eada v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2012 (6) ALD 98 (DB); B.K. Srinivasan v. State of Karnataka, (1987) 1 SCC 658; Sonic ....
In this regard, while allowing the defendant to produce these documents as additional evidence, this Court relied on a decision reported in AIR 2016 Hyderabad 112 (Revision Petition No. 303112015) (Datti Kameswari Vs. ... NICCO UCO Alliance Credit Ltd., Kolkatta) and 2003 (8) SCC 745 (Narbada Devi Gupta V/s. Birendra Kumar Jaiswal and another), in which the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that, mere production and marking of a document as exhibit is not enough to prove the contents of the said document.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.