AI Overview...
Deadline for Submitting Review Petitions in District Consumer Forums under Consumer Protection Act
-
Limitation Period for Filing Review Petitions
Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, review petitions against orders of District Consumer Forums generally must be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. This is consistent with the procedural timelines outlined in relevant judicial and statutory provisions.
Housing Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board vs Smt. Anit Mittal - Consumer National -
Judicial Precedents and Limitation Rules
Courts have emphasized that timely filing of review petitions is mandatory, and delays beyond the prescribed period can lead to dismissal on grounds of limitation. For instance, in cases where review petitions are filed after the deadline (commonly 30 days), courts have dismissed them citing non-compliance with procedural timelines.
- vs - - Consumer National -
Specific Case References
- In one judgment, the Court reiterated that if a review petition is not filed within two months (or 60 days) from the date of the order, it may be barred by limitation, referencing Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act.
-
The courts have consistently held that procedural deadlines are inviolable, and failure to adhere results in dismissal of review petitions.
- vs - - Consumer National -
Exceptions and Judicial Discretion
While procedural rules are strict, courts may exercise discretion in exceptional cases, but generally, the 30-day deadline remains the standard for review petitions in consumer forums.
Summary
The deadline for submitting review petitions in District Consumer Forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, is typically 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. Filing beyond this period is generally considered barred by limitation, leading to dismissal of the review petition. This timeline aligns with judicial precedents and statutory provisions emphasizing procedural compliance.
References: - Housing Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board vs Smt. Anit Mittal - Consumer National - - vs - - Consumer National
Search Results for "Deadline for Submitting Review Petitions in District Consumer Forums under Consumer Protection Act"
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 3463 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
AVM J RAJENDRA AVSM VSM (RETD), PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. SADHNA SHANKER, MEMBER
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the “Act”) against the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan („State Commission‟) Order dated 30.04.2024 in FA No. 431/2023 dismissing the Appeal filed by the OPs and upholding the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jaipur („District ... Being aggrieved by the Order of the District Forum, OPs filed Appeal No. 431/2023 and the State Commissi....
2020 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 291 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Dinesh Singh, PRESIDING MEMBER
, 18) ... ... (B) Jurisdictional error - No error apparent in the concurrent findings of fact by both lower forums ... ... ... Result: Revision petition dismissed; compensation due to complainant upheld. ... In that case, if he does not approach the Consumer Forum within two years of demanding the refund, the claim may become barred by the limitation prescribed in Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act. ... Consumer Disputes Redressal #HL_STA....
2024 0 Supreme(Del) 490 • India - Delhi
YASHWANT VARMA, DHARMESH SHARMA
(A) Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections 21 and 131 - Trade Mark Rules, 2002 - Rules 50, 51; Trade Mark Rules, 2017 - Rules 45, 46 - Procedural ... set by the 2002 Rules remained in effect, and such deadlines were inviolable despite the repeal of the 2002 Rules by the 2017 Rules ... The court emphasized that deemed abandonment occurs upon the expiration of established deadlines and outlined that procedural changes ... On the contrary, sub-section (2)(a) of Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act#....
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 400 • India - Delhi
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Petitioner Nos 12 to 14 are advocates who registered with the BCD after the deadline for registering for the Scheme and seek reopening ... Governmental policies are amenable to judicial review and if the allegation is one of discrimination the same would have to be examined ... Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2001 - Chief Minister’s Advocates Welfare Scheme - Group life insurance and ... Commission, State Consumer Forum, as on 01.12.2019, upon due endorsement by Bar Council of Delhi and cross-endorsement by....
2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 440 • India - Kerala
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 16(2)(c) and 16(4) - Challenge to the constitutional validity of provisions ... Paras 71, 72, 99) ... ... (D) Procedural Provisions - Amendments to filing deadlines ... Property, therefore, within the constitutional protection, denotes group of rights inhering citizen's relation to physical thing, as right to possess, use and dispose of it in accordance with law. ... The ITC can be availed by the recipient for the bonafide scenarios listed in those Circulars on submitting....
2008 3 Supreme 331 • India - Supreme Court
DALVEER BHANDARI, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
... (v) Interpretation of Constitution – When judicial review is barred ... It has been challenged in a number of writ petitions. ... 2. ... The fundamental question that arises in these writ petitions is: Whether Article 15(5), inserted by the 93rd Amendment, is consistent ... subject to judicial review the Act held valid. ... Seattle School District No.1,36 et al, reported in 168 Lawyers Ed. 2d 508 & 517 (2007), school districts used a student’s race to assign th....
2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1170 • India - Supreme Court
K. M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY
It further challenges Order dated 28.12.2020 in Review Petition No. 682 of 2020. ... Review filed by appellant was dismissed. ... (Para 48) (D) Constitution of India – Article 32/226 – Judicial review of State action – Writ jurisdiction ... This was unsuccessfully canvassed before the High Court in the Review Petition. ... and that too for a long period of 25 years, and what is more, compelled to pass on the burden to the hapless consumer. ... Purchasing such a small ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4018 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S.KULKARNI, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
(Paras 61, 72) ... ... Result: Petition dismissed. ... (Paras 1-4, 22) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming ... (A) Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4-A(4) and 10A(2)(c) - The court examined the retroactive ... and other allied laws including the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and Rules. ... Vyas, Additional G.P. appearing of the State of Maharashtra has also opposed the petition. She would rely on the ....
2021 0 Supreme(SC) 141 • India - Supreme Court
A.M.KHANWILKAR, B.R.GAVAI, KRISHNA MURARI
(IB) No. 156/MB/2018 - NCLT vide order dated admitted Petition and directed moratorium to commence as prescribed under Section 14 ... Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as “CIRP”) of itself vide Company Petition ... The incorporation of such onesided clauses in an agreement constitutes an unfair trade practice as per Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 since it adopts unfair methods or practices for the purpose of selling the fl....
2018 7 Supreme 129 • India - Supreme Court
DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, ASHOK BHUSHAN, A. K. SIKRI, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
measures in place – Oversight by Technology and Architecture Review Board and Security Review Committee – Introduction of RD in ... passed during pendency of instant petitions – Observed, respondents should have obtained clarification from the Coirt before issuing ... Srikrishna Committee Report and the Draft Data Protection Bill referred. ... or the Bureau, or any consumer or any association recognized in this behalf by the Central or State Government. ... In Vernonia School District ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
