AI Overview

AI Overview...

#ServiceLaw, #SeniorityRules, #CadreEncadrement

Ex Cadre to Encadre Post: How to Count Seniority


In government service, disputes over seniority between direct recruits and promotees are common, especially when posts transition from ex-cadre (temporary or outside the regular cadre) to encadre (formally included in the cadre). Understanding how courts determine seniority counting in such cases is crucial for employees navigating promotions and career progression.


This post breaks down key principles from Supreme Court and High Court judgments, focusing on ex cadre to encadre post seniority counting. We'll explore quota rules, continuous service, and constitutional protections under Articles 14 and 16. Note: This is general information based on case law, not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your situation.


What Are Ex-Cadre and Encadre Posts?



Courts emphasize that mere long occupancy of ex-cadre posts does not entitle officers to retrospective seniority or mandamus for encadrement. T. N. Administrative Service Officers Association VS Union Of India - 2000 3 Supreme 493


Core Principles of Seniority Counting


Seniority is generally based on length of continuous officiating service, but subject to quota rules between sources of recruitment (direct vs. promotion). Key rulings clarify:


1. Quota Does Not Mandate Rotation


Quota system does not necessitate adoption of rotational rule in practical application - Many ways of working out quota prescription can be devised of which Rota is certainly one. N. K. Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - 1976 Supreme(SC) 423



2. Seniority from Encadrement Date, Not Initial Appointment


In Tripura Power Engineering Service, petitioners appointed as Junior Engineers on fixed pay sought seniority from initial date. Court held: their seniority can be counted only from the date of their encadrement in the TPES and not from the date of their initial appointment. Shibajyoti Bhattacharjee, S/O Late Satya Ranjan Bhattacharjee VS State of Tripura represented by the Secretary to the Department of Power - 2017 Supreme(Tri) 6



3. Continuous Service in Feeder Cadre Essential


The period spent in a promotional post on officiating basis cannot be permitted to be factored in for calculating length of service in a particular post. Unless the Rules otherwise provide, officiation in a particular post cannot encadre the incumbent in that post. Imlikokla Longchar VS State of Nagaland - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1028



Constitutional Safeguards: Articles 14 & 16


Seniority consideration is a fundamental right under Article 16, flowing from Article 14 equality. Jagdish Prasad VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 Supreme(SC) 638



In IAS cases, no mandamus for encadrement merely due to long ex-cadre existence: issuance of a mandamus to increase the cadre strength or to encadre a particular post merely on the basis of long existence of these posts would be inappropriate. T. N. Administrative Service Officers Association VS Union Of India - 2000 3 Supreme 493


Case Studies: Practical Applications


Gujarat Deputy Collectors (Direct vs Promotees)


High Court judgment modified: Promotees excess in Period A retain full service; Period B excess pushed below direct recruits. New seniority list directed. N. K. Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - 1976 Supreme(SC) 423


Nagaland Secretariat Service


Seniority fixed from cadre 'birth' date (29.06.2007), not earlier. Retrospective claims rejected per rules. Ruokuosazo Sachu VS State of Nagaland - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 1217


PHED Assam: Ex-Cadre Regularisation


Junior Engineers in ex-cadre posts need rule amendment for encadrement or legal fiction to count service for promotion. Without it, juniors overtake. Dhenuram Mili VS State of Assam - 2014 Supreme(Gau) 601


Absorption and Terms Acceptance


Employee accepting absorption terms (seniority at bottom) cannot later challenge. Ex-cadre/supernumerary post created to avoid demotion. Govinda Chandra Tiria VS Sibaji Charan Panda - 2020 Supreme(SC) 470


| Scenario | Seniority Counting Rule | Key Citation |
|----------|-------------------------|--------------|
| Excess promotees (Period A) | Full service retained | N. K. Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - 1976 Supreme(SC) 423 |
| Post-encadrement | From encadrement date | Shibajyoti Bhattacharjee, S/O Late Satya Ranjan Bhattacharjee VS State of Tripura represented by the Secretary to the Department of Power - 2017 Supreme(Tri) 6 |
| Ad-hoc officiation | Excluded from feeder service | Imlikokla Longchar VS State of Nagaland - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1028 |
| Absorption on request | Bottom of list, past service for benefits | Govinda Chandra Tiria VS Sibaji Charan Panda - 2020 Supreme(SC) 470 |
| No rule amendment | No retrospective seniority | Dhenuram Mili VS State of Assam - 2014 Supreme(Gau) 601 |


Challenges and Common Pitfalls



Union of India must review ex-cadre posts for encadrement, but only after consultation; retrospective effect possible if justified, balancing inter se seniority. T. N. Administrative Service Officers Association VS Union Of India - 2000 3 Supreme 493


Key Takeaways for Employees



  1. Check Service Rules: Seniority hinges on specific rules (e.g., IPS Seniority Rules, State Service Rules).

  2. Document Continuous Service: Only regular, cadre service counts fully.

  3. Quota Compliance: Excess promotees may 'step down' for direct recruits.

  4. Seek Encadrement: Representations to government; courts direct review, not automatic relief.

  5. Act Promptly: Laches bars stale claims.


In Andaman & Nicobar, court directed encadrement of 7 posts for equality: People who have burnt their boats should sail together. Virendra Krishna Mishra VS Union of India - 2014 Supreme(SC) 914


Conclusion


Ex cadre to encadre post seniority counting prioritizes rule-based fairness, protecting direct recruits while rewarding continuous service. Courts intervene for equity but respect administrative discretion. Pending disputes? Review your rules and precedents like those above N. K. Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - 1976 Supreme(SC) 423 Shibajyoti Bhattacharjee, S/O Late Satya Ranjan Bhattacharjee VS State of Tripura represented by the Secretary to the Department of Power - 2017 Supreme(Tri) 6.


Disclaimer: This article synthesizes case law for educational purposes. Outcomes depend on facts and jurisdiction. Seek professional legal counsel.




References: All citations from Supreme Court/High Court judgments provided in search results.

Search Results for "Ex Cadre to Encadre Post: Seniority Counting Rules"

N. K. Chauhan VS State Of Gujarat - 1976 Supreme(SC) 423

1976 0 Supreme(SC) 423 India - Supreme Court

P.N.BHAGWATI, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER

their quota - On this basis judgment of High Court stands substantially modified but preparation of a new seniority list becomes ... se seniority on lines this judgment directs - Subject has been pending so long that very expeditious administrative finalization ... - Lack of adequate articulation of simple points regarding rotation and seniority and amber light shed by case-law on questions ... It is obvious that the Resolution of 1959 is silent on how to allocate or reckon the quota as also on #HL_STAR....

K. Narayanan: R. Mahadev VS State of Karnataka - 1993 Supreme(SC) 736

1993 0 Supreme(SC) 736 India - Supreme Court

R.M.SAHAI, S.C.AGRAWAL

9 of 1975 - Karnataka Public Works Engineering Department Service (Recruitment) (Amendment) Rules, 1985 – Assistant Engineers – Seniority ... having contributed largest number of decisions from this Court touching upon nearly every aspect of service law most common being seniority ... reiterating that distinction in qualification was valid criteria for determining eligibility for promotion except where both held same post ... An employee occupying a higher post in different cadre may on regularisation b....

Syed Khalid Rizvi: Krishna Behari Srivastava: Ramesh Prasad Singh VS Union Of India: State Of U. P. : Union Of India - 1992 Supreme(SC) 851

1992 0 Supreme(SC) 851 India - Supreme Court

A.M.AHMADI, K.RAMASWAMY, M.M.PUNCHHI

Rules and relevant rules were deemed have been relaxed and directions given to central government to seniority are illegal However ... seniority lists produced by State government which would give notice to who were included in notional list of their inter se ... Constitution Of India,1950 - Articles 14, 16 - INDIAN POLICE SERVICE (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954 ... selectlist was posted to an ex cadre post#HL_E....

Jagdish Prasad VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 Supreme(SC) 638

2011 0 Supreme(SC) 638 India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR

Held being considered in their respective seniority is a fundamental right under Article 16 flowing from the right under Article ... and fill up the post in year-wise basis. ... Coming to the same conclusion but for different reasons, this court had gave fresh directions to the State to conduct fresh examination ... of posts in any cadre of service to which promotions are made on the basis of both by merit and by seniority-cum-merit under these ... t....

Kunhikrishnan Nambiar VS State of Kerala - 1964 Supreme(Ker) 172

1964 0 Supreme(Ker) 172 India - Kerala

P.T.RAMAN NAYAR, P.GOVINDA NAIR, M.S.MENON

a person's service in their parent State would count for seniority in the integrated service was deemed irrelevant. ... a person's service in their parent State would count for seniority in the integrated service was deemed irrelevant. ... the question of whether a person's service in their parent State would count for seniority in the integrated service was deemed irrelevant ... Rules, 1954, that the post of Special Officer be temporarily encadred a....

Ruokuosazo Sachu VS State of Nagaland - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 1217

2019 0 Supreme(Gau) 1217 India - Gauhati

MANISH CHOUDHURY

granted seniority from a date anterior to 29.06.2007 i.e. the date when he was born in the cadre of Nagaland Secretariat Service ... in fixing his seniority in the cadre of Lower Division Assistant (LDA), subsequently re-designated as Junior Secretariat Assistant ... , in view of the Cabinet decision – Any retrospective seniority to#H....

Monmohan Deka VS Assam State Higher Secondary School - 2012 Supreme(Gau) 699

2012 0 Supreme(Gau) 699 India - Gauhati

I.A.ANSARI, P.K.MUSAHARY

that in face of provisions of seniority of a Demonstrator has to be counted by taking into account his service not merely from date ... Association – Root of these appeals lies controversy as to whether, while counting seniority of a Demonstrator under Assam (Secondary ... Education) Provinciliased Service Rules, 2003 period of servic....

Manmohan Deka & Ors.  VS State of Assam & Ors.  - 2012 Supreme(Gau) 557

2012 0 Supreme(Gau) 557 India - Gauhati

I.A.ANSARI, P.K.MUSAHARY

came to be provincialised, must be counted for the purpose of determining his seniority in same cadre in which stands placed a Graduate ... fall within the ambit of no shadow of doubt, in our mind, that in the face of the provisions seniority of a Demonstrator has to ... of this finding two letters which had been issued by Gov....

Dhenuram Mili VS State of Assam - 2014 Supreme(Gau) 601

2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 601 India - Gauhati

TINLIANTHANG VAIPHEI

in regular cadre by means of legal fiction and count their past services in ex-cadre posts held by them as qualifying service for ... of the petitioners to next higher post of Assistant Executive Engineer is, by way of amendment of extant rules, either to encadre ... their ex-cadre....

Jagdish Chandra Sen S/o Shri Ladu Ram Nai VS State Of Rajasthan - 2018 Supreme(Raj) 250

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 250 India - Rajasthan

ARUN BHANSALI

in counseling list, ignoring seniority; despite available of vacant post at a given School, posting is given to another School while ... actual number of vacant posts available as on date of counseling, allotting place of posting in School, which were not included ... appointed on post of Teacher Gr. ... or promoted shall count the period #HL_S....

SUVENDRA SEKHAR MOHANTY vs STATE OF ORISSA

India - Orissa

The post of Jr. ... Deptt. are, therefore, requested to transfer the post of Jr. ... font-family:BookmanOldStyle,serif;font-size:11.213pt">will be counted towards pension and pensionary benefits, but such service will not count ... Respondent No.1 is directed to encadre the O.A. was disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority to encadre

Harish Chander	  vs Union of India & Another

India - Delhi High Court

We direct the Respondents to count the seniority of the Petitioner in the Central Secretariat Clerical Services Cadre since 1.8.1970 in the rank of LDC, and from 17.12.1995 in the rank of UDC. ... The Petitioner is aggrieved by the direction whereby his seniority upon absorption into the CSCS Cadre as UDC has been directed to be fixed only from the date of absorption, thereby nullifying his past service for purposes of seniority altogether ... 1941/1998 to the extent that it dir....

Harish Chander	  vs Union of India & Another

India - Delhi High Court

We direct the Respondents to count the seniority of the Petitioner in the Central Secretariat Clerical Services Cadre since 1.8.1970 in the rank of LDC, and from 17.12.1995 in the rank of UDC. ... The Petitioner is aggrieved by the direction whereby his seniority upon absorption into the CSCS Cadre as UDC has been directed to be fixed only from the date of absorption, thereby nullifying his past service for purposes of seniority altogether ... 1941/1998 to the extent that it dir....

T. N. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION VS Union of India - 2000 3 Supreme 493

2000 3 Supreme 493 India - Supreme Court

N.S.HEGDE, M.JAGANNADHA RAO

In such a situation, issuance of a mandamus to increase the cadre strength or to encadre a particular post merely on the basis of long existence of these posts would be inappropriate. ... By this failure the promotees promotion got inordinately delayed and they have lost their seniority in the promoted cadre, therefore, they are entitled to their seniority being fixed with retrospective effect. ... They also contend that by virtue of the amendments of 1997, the posts earmarked for Stat....

T. N. Administrative Service Officers Association VS Union Of India - 2000 3 Supreme 493

2000 3 Supreme 493 India - Supreme Court

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, N.S.HEGDE

In such a situation, issuance of a mandamus to increase the cadre strength or to encadre a particular post merely on the basis of long existence of these posts would be inappropriate.18. ... By this failure the promotees promotion got inordinately delayed and they have not lost their seniority in the promoted cadre, therefore, they are entitled to their seniority being fixed with retrospective effect. ... They also contend that by virtue of the amendments of 1997, the posts earmarked ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top