AI Overview...
-
Prakash Patil - The sources mention Prakash Patil primarily in relation to legal proceedings and administrative issues within the Excise Department. Notably, in WRIT PETITION NO. 3749/2013, it is stated that the license has been in the name of Prakash for almost 30 years, indicating his long-standing association with the license or the department ISHWARABAI@KISHORABAI VIRENDRA TOMPE vs THE HONBLE MINISTER, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA AND OTHERS - Bombay, PRAKASH DHONDIRAM HATANGALE vs THE MINISTER FOR STATE EXCISE AND OTHERS - Bombay.
-
Excise Department - Several references highlight actions taken by or issues within the department, such as inspections, raids, and legal disputes. For example, a surprise check involved intercepting a bus with liquor bottles, conducted by the Excise Department, with Sub Inspector Prakash Eshwara Patil involved in the inspection Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation VS Bhupal Madhukar Pol - Bombay, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs Bhupal Madhukar Pol - Bombay.
-
Legal Proceedings - Multiple cases involve court decisions related to the Excise Department, including directives to sell sugar after paying excise dues and rulings on departmental promotions and seniority. Courts have also addressed misinterpretations of rules by the department, impacting employee stagnation INDIAN BANK VS STATE OF KARNATAKA, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE - Karnataka, MANOHAR LAL PARMAR VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Administrative and Personnel Issues - There are references to transfers, promotions, and departmental rules, with courts sometimes intervening to ensure proper seniority and promotion procedures. For instance, the court directed the department to confirm the applicant after three years of service and clarified the absence of provisions based on departmental examination results MANOHAR LAL PARMAR VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Additional Context - Some sources mention other government departments like the Central Public Works Department and Rural Engineering Department, but these are less directly related to Prakash Patil or the Excise Department Om Prakash Purohit VS Union of India - Rajasthan, Girish Shukla VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Prakash Patil appears to be a key figure associated with the Excise Department, involved in legal disputes concerning licensing, departmental inspections, and administrative decisions. The references suggest a long-standing association with liquor licensing and departmental procedures, with courts often stepping in to resolve issues related to promotions, seniority, and rule interpretation. His name is notably linked to the license held for nearly three decades and to departmental inspections and legal cases involving liquor regulations.
Search Results for "Excise Department Prakash Patil"
• India - Bombay
The said order was assailed before the Commissioner (State Excise). ... Department, & othes & othes WRIT PETITION NO. 3749 OF 2013 Petition No. 3749/2013 submits that almost 30 years, the licence is in the name of Prakash
• India - Bombay
The said order was assailed before the Commissioner (State Excise). ... Department, & othes & othes WRIT PETITION NO. 3749 OF 2013 Petition No. 3749/2013 submits that almost 30 years, the licence is in the name of Prakash
• India - Bombay
The Hon'ble Minister, State Excise Department, State Excise Department, Hatangale, Age 65 years, Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the Mr.H.V.Patil
2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 2353 • India - Bombay
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Prakash Eshwara Patil, Sub Inspector of Excise Department. In his examination in chief, he gave following evidence: It was also previously serving under same post of Sub-Inspector. At the relevant time I was entrusted with work of Inspection in Excise Department. ... A surprise check was conducted by the Excise Department at 1:45 A.M. by intercepting the bus. The raiding team found a box containing 12 bottles of liquor behind the seat of the Driver.....
2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 745 • India - Karnataka
V.GOPALA GOWDA
petitions -their writ petitions allowed -Deputy Commissioner directed to sell sugar under lock and key and after deducting central excise ... Since the sale of sugar produced by the factory is subject to payment of excise dues under Rule 4 (1) of the central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001, the Central Government Standing counsel also claims priority of its dues. ... After paying the excise dues, the balance amount shall be disbursed to the farmers. ... --- *** --- ... . ...
2006 0 Supreme(HP) 58 • India - Himachal Pradesh
NARINDER SINGH THAKUR, B.S.CHAUHAN
The respondent department had misinterpreted the rules, leading to the applicant's stagnation without promotion. ... Final Decision: The court directed the respondent department to confirm the applicant after completion of three years of service ... and the absence of provisions for determining seniority based on departmental examination passing or non-passing precluded the department ... In the meanwhile, the respondent department has also brought into force new set of R&P Rules known as "HP. Excise a....
2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2651 • India - High Court of Bombay
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
Prakash Eshwara Patil, Sub Inspector of Excise Department. In his examination in chief, he gave following evidence: It was also previously serving under same post of Sub- Inspector. At the relevant time I was entrusted with work of Inspection in Excise Department. ... A surprise check was conducted by the Excise Department at 1:45 A.M. by intercepting the bus. The raiding team found a box containing 12 bottles of liquor behind the seat of the Driver.....
1983 0 Supreme(Bom) 74 • India - Bombay
D.P.MADON, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Final Decision: The question referred to the court is answered in the negative, in favor of the assessee and against the department ... Budh Prakash Jai Prakash reported in [1954] 5 STC 193 (SC). Reference may also be made to the case of State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. (Madras) Ltd. reported in [1958] 9 STC 353 (SC). ... The price list of the assessees after stating the price of beer mentioned that the prices were ex-brewery, exclusive of excise duty and cost of bottles. ... In the premises, the question refer....
2015 0 Supreme(All) 3882 • India - Allahabad
ANIL KUMAR
State of U.P. and others (1990) 2 UPLBEC 905, Om Prakash Rana vs. Swaroop Singh Tomar and others (1986) 3 SCC 118, B. ... Rural Engineering Department. 2. Allegations of mala fides in the transfers. ... Rural Engineering Department, Lipik Varg Sewa Niyamawali, 1987 - Rule 4(2) - Sajid Hussain and another vs. ... In this connection, we may refer to a decision of this Court in Om Prakash Rana v. ... Rural Engineering Department, IIIrd Floor, Jawahar Bhawan, Lucknow only to victimize them and the same are ....
2000 0 Supreme(Raj) 662 • India - Rajasthan
A.R.LAKSHMANAN, RAJESH BALIA
(a) Central Public Works Department Manual, Sec. 8, Para 5 – Superintending Engineer Transferred – Central Administrative Tribunal ... Patil, as His Lordship then was, and Honble Mr. Justice Bhagwati Prasad. ... (5). Present appellant, Om Prakash Purohit, did not file any appeal against the said order but filed a review application No. 9 of 2000. ... –Appellant in this appeal is an Engineer employed in the Central Public Works Department. ... Bhargava, Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department, Se....
Filter by Legal Phrase
