AI Overview

AI Overview...

#FardFlaws #JudicialProceedings #LegalIndia

Fard Not Completed: Understanding Flawed Judicial Proceedings


In Indian legal practice, Fard documents—such as Fard-e-beyan (initial statements or dying declarations), Fard Jamabandi (land records), or Fard Tanaza (settlement records)—play a pivotal role in both criminal and civil matters. When these are not completed properly or handled inadequately, it often renders judicial proceedings flawed, leading to acquittals, quashed orders, or overturned convictions. This blog delves into real court judgments highlighting this issue, explaining why procedural lapses matter and how they impact cases. If you're dealing with a case involving incomplete Fard documentation, understanding these principles can help navigate the system effectively.


Note: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation, as outcomes vary by facts and jurisdiction.


What is 'Fard' in Legal Contexts?


'Fard' refers to official extracts or statements in Indian administrative and judicial processes:
- Fard-e-beyan: Often the first information report (FIR) or dying declaration recorded at the scene or hospital. It's crucial in criminal cases like murder. Suresh VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1780
- Fard Jamabandi: A certified extract of land ownership records, vital in revenue and property disputes. BIMLA KAUR MULTANI DASUYA vs ITO DASUYA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1411
- Fard Tanaza or Fard Intikhab: Used in settlement or mutation proceedings for property rights.


Courts scrutinize these for completeness and authenticity. An incomplete or flawed Fard can break the chain of evidence, making proceedings unsustainable. As one judgment notes, prosecution has failed to lead convincing evidence so as to complete the chain of circumstances. Suresh Jat VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1149


Common Scenarios: When Fard Not Completed Leads to Flawed Proceedings


1. Criminal Cases: Dying Declarations and FIRs


In murder trials relying on circumstantial evidence, an improperly recorded Fard-e-beyan often dooms the prosecution.




  • Insufficient Scrutiny of Dying Declarations: A dying declaration recorded by police (not a Magistrate) must be closely examined. If the doctor permitting it isn't examined, or fitness isn't certified, it's unreliable. Doctor, who had permitted ASI to record statement of deceased, was not examined and, as such, fard-e-beyan of deceased appears to be doubtful. Munna Shukla VS State Of Bihar - 2020 Supreme(Pat) 29 The court acquitted the accused, emphasizing prejudice under Section 313 CrPC when the declaration wasn't put to the accused.




  • Appellant Not Named in Fard-e-beyan: In a Bihar murder case, the trial court convicted despite the appellant not being named in the Fard-e-beyan or attributed any overt act. The first thing that needs to be noted in connection with the Fard-e-beyan is that the appellant Sajjan Sharma is not named there as one of the accused. Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar - 2011 1 Supreme 83 Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar The Supreme Court deprecated mechanical trials under Sections 211 and 313 CrPC, granting benefit of doubt.




  • Flawed Chain in Circumstantial Evidence: In Suresh and Prabhu Lal's murder case, recoveries and last-seen evidence linked to Fard-e-beyan failed against Suresh. The prosecution's evidence against Suresh was insufficient to establish motive or a direct link to the crime. Suresh VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1780 Suresh VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 409 His conviction was overturned as the chain was broken.




2. Revenue and Property Disputes


Incomplete Fard records undermine title claims:
- Fard Jamabandi Not Proof of Income: In tax assessments, mere Fard Jamabandi doesn't prove agricultural income without supporting J Forms or Girdawari. The AO rejected it, but appeals highlighted the need for complete documentation. BIMLA KAUR MULTANI DASUYA vs ITO DASUYA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1411



  • Fard Tanaza and Retrospective Changes: Revenue officers can't revisit settled Fard Tanaza without appeals. The Record Officer rejected this application on the ground that as the matter had already been decided by a Fard Tanaza by his predecessor. Government decisions can't override judicial ones retrospectively. Bhera VS Manager, Mewar Sugar Mills Ltd. , Bhopalsagar - 1955 Supreme(Raj) 229


3. Other Judicial Lapses Tied to Fard




  • Procedural Irregularities in Trials: Courts criticize mechanical handling. Trial courts should not perform u/s 211 and 313 in an unmindful and mechanical manner. Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar - 2011 1 Supreme 83 This includes not confronting accused with Fard evidence.




  • Investigation Flaws: Even if part of investigation is flawed, the whole case isn't discarded—but incomplete Fard handling can tip the scale. Inspite thereof, the entire prosecution case cannot be thrown out merely because part of the investigation is flawed. Suresh Jat VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1149




Key Legal Principles from Judgments


Courts apply strict standards:
1. Chain of Circumstantial Evidence Must Be Unbroken: Every link, including Fard, must prove guilt beyond doubt. Any gap leads to acquittal. Suresh VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1780
2. Dying Declarations Need Corroboration: Without doctor testimony or proper recording, they're weak. Dying declaration which is not recorded by a Magistrate has to be scrutinized closely. Munna Shukla VS State Of Bihar - 2020 Supreme(Pat) 29
3. Benefit of Doubt for Procedural Flaws: If Fard doesn't name or link the accused, conviction fails. Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar - 2011 1 Supreme 83
4. Judicial Restraint in Personal/Revenue Matters: Courts won't interfere lightly, but flawed Fard voids proceedings. In triple talaq context (tangentially), affidavits in prior proceedings were dismissed as self-serving if not inter-parties. Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577
5. Revenue Records Not Conclusive: Fard Jamabandi supports but doesn't prove title or income alone. Full records needed.


Pro Tip: Always ensure Fard is recorded by competent authority, certified, and confronted to parties early.


Impact on Proceedings: Why It Matters


Flawed Fard handling doesn't just lead to acquittals; it erodes public trust. In one case, High Courts were urged to correct mechanical trials in Bihar. Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar In revenue matters, it delays mutations, affecting property rights. Generally, courts quash orders if procedures under CrPC Sections 313, 211 or revenue codes are ignored.


For instance, in a bail case, completed investigation and lack of direct Fard link granted anticipatory bail. Arish Parvez VS UT of J&K - 2022 Supreme(J&K) 687


Key Takeaways



  • Complete Fard Promptly: Record with Magistrates where possible; get medical fitness notes.

  • Corroborate Evidence: Fard alone rarely suffices—build a full chain.

  • Challenge Flaws Early: Mechanical proceedings invite higher court intervention.

  • Revenue Caution: Support Fard Jamabandi with J Forms, Girdawari for credibility.


In most cases, Fard not completed signals deeper procedural issues, often dooming proceedings. Judgments like those in murder appeals show courts prioritize fairness over haste. Suresh Jat VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1149


Conclusion


Navigating cases with incomplete Fard requires vigilance. While these precedents guide, each matter turns on specifics. Stay informed, document meticulously, and seek professional help to avoid flawed outcomes.


Disclaimer: This article synthesizes public judgments for educational purposes. Legal outcomes depend on individual facts. It is not a substitute for personalized legal counsel. Always approach a licensed attorney.


(Word count approx. 1050)

Search Results for "Fard Not Completed: Flawed Judicial Proceedings"

Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577

2017 5 Supreme 577 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. ABDUL NAZEER

must fail on judicial front. ... – Interference in matters of personal law is clearly beyond judicial examination – Judiciary must always exercise absolute restraint ... sanctity – Religion is a matter of faith, and not of logic – It is not open to a court to accept an egalitarian approach, over a ... So also the affidavit dated 31-8-1988, filed in some previous judicial proceedings not inter parties, containing a self-serving statement ... did #HL_S....

Suresh VS State of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1780

2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 1780 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Finding of the Court: The court found that the prosecution's evidence against Suresh was insufficient to establish ... Murder - Conviction - IPC Sections 302, 120B - The court analyzed circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, and recoveries ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain leading to the guilt of the accused ... and were declared hostile and hence, the circumstance of extra-judicial confession was discarded by the trial #HL_START....

Manjula Devi vs The State Of Bihar

India - Principal Bench Patna

ipso facto vitiate the evidence; and "Presumption", in Black's, "is a rule evidence of the prosecution and examination of accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was completed

PRABHU LAL vs STATE

India - High Court of Rajasthan - Rajasthan High Court Principal Seat Jodhpur

identification proceedings

Suresh VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 409

2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 409 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including motive, last seen, recoveries, and extra-judicial confession ... The recoveries made from Suresh did not inspire confidence. ... The trial court convicted both appellants, but the High Court acquitted Suresh and upheld Prabhu Lal's conviction. ... Inspite thereof, the entire prosecution case cannot be thrown out merely because part of the investigation is flawed. ... The prosecution also alleged that the accused made an extra-#HL_STA....

Selvaradjalou Chetty Trus vs Sarvothaman Jayalakshmi Ammal (Died) - 2025 Supreme(Mad) 4490

2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4490 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

N. SATHISH KUMAR

to factual accuracies in judicial proceedings. ... (Paras 24, 39) ... ... (B) Judicial review - Courts must review facts and context, not just legal ... found execution petition an abuse of process - Properties not allotted to execution petitioner per compromise decree - No evidence ... The Judicial Officer who dealt the matter has abdicated his responsibility as Judicial Officer. ... proceedings. ... by way of e....

RASHEEDA vs KERALA STATE ELETRICITY BOARD LIMITED - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5320

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5320 India - High Court of Kerala

AMIT RAWAL, J

when a civil court is seized of the matter; this protects the integrity of judicial proceedings. ... proceedings. ... was ongoing, as it could disrupt the legal process and the injunction granted by the civil court. ... But the fact remains that the Electricity department could not have sent this impugned communication, once civil court is seized ... action will be taken. ... dispute is pending.

CHANDRAKANT MAGANLAL PATEL VS ISHWARLAL GHELABHAI CHOKSEY - 1980 Supreme(Bom) 243

1980 0 Supreme(Bom) 243 India - Bombay

D.M.REGE

Unlike a private award, an award in Court proceedings has no independent existence and continues to be a part of the judicial proceedings ... Finding of the Court: The award in the pending Court proceedings was not compulsorily registerable under section 17 ... REGISTRATION ACT - REGISTERABILITY OF AWARD - AWARD IN PENDING COURT PROCEEDINGS - NOT COMPULSORILY ....

Krishna Sanitation Society Jatroon VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2016 Supreme(HP) 2005

2016 0 Supreme(HP) 2005 India - Himachal Pradesh

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SANDEEP SHARMA

The court also emphasized the right of the government to cancel tenders without assigning reasons and the limitations of judicial ... action. ... Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition and pending applications, upholding the cancellation of the tender and ... to be rejected was flawed in any manner whatsoever. ... Courts can interfere in tender or contractual matters in exercise of power of judicial review only in case the process ado....

Francis George vs District Revenue Officer, Collectorate of Chennai, Chennai - 2025 Supreme(Mad) 2660

2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2660 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

was found inappropriate due to the finality of earlier court proceedings regarding the petitioner's title. ... confirmed the prior judgments establishing the petitioner's title through a valid sale deed executed following legal protocol. ... through a sale deed from 2006. ... judicial discretion. ... This process shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ... and orders passed by this #....

Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar - 2011 1 Supreme 83

2011 1 Supreme 83 India - Supreme Court

AFTAB ALAM, R.M.LODHA

The police after investigation submitted chargesheet against seven accused persons of whom five were named in the Fard-e-beyan/FIR and two namely, Sajjan Sharma (the appellant) and Mantu Chaudhri were not named in the Fard-e-beyan/FIR. ... The first thing that needs to be noted in connection with the Fard-e- beyan is that the appellant Sajjan Sharma is not named there as one of the accused. ... Let a copy of this order be placed before the Hon’ble Judge of the Patna High Court, in-charge of the State’s ....

Sajjan Sharma VS State of Bihar

India - Crimes

AFTAB ALAM, R.M.LODHA

The police after investigation submitted chargesheet against seven accused persons of whom five were named in the Fard-e-beyan/FIR and two namely, Sajjan Sharma (the appellant) and Mantu Chaudhri were not named in the Fard-e-beyan/FIR. ... The first thing that needs to be noted in connection with the Fard-e- beyan is that the appellant Sajjan Sharma is not named there as one of the accused. ... Let a copy of this order be placed before the Hon’ble Judge of the Patna High Court, in-charge of the State’s ....

Rajender Singh vs Gurbachan Singh and ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 8814

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 8814 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI

The foundational principle of property law, nemo dat quod non habet (no one can give what he does not have), applies with full force. ... Therefore, the 2014 entries, being the product of a fundamentally flawed process, are void ab initio and confer no legitimacy upon the defendants' claim. 19. ... It is not, and cannot be, a vehicle for adjudicating substantive rights of ownership or for effecting a change in title based on a contested claim of inheritance or tenancy. ... A significant administrative determination was made by the revenue....

Munna Shukla VS State Of Bihar - 2020 Supreme(Pat) 29

2020 0 Supreme(Pat) 29 India - Patna

HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

of deceased which was completed within half an hour. ... This witness, further, claimed that he sought permission from doctor to record the fard-e-beyan of deceased but doctor asked him to wait and after sometime when doctor completed the treatment of deceased, he permitted him to take fard-e-beyan of deceased and, thereafter, he started recording the fard-e-beyan ... She, further, submitted that according to prosecution case, the fard-e-beyan of deceased was recorded on 19.11.1988 at ....

BIMLA KAUR MULTANI DASUYA vs ITO  DASUYA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1411

2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1411 India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Amritsar Bench)

However, the AO was not satisfied with the explanation and the documentary evidences produced and the assessment was completed on a total income of Rs. 22,92,406/-, (which included additions of Rs.8,84,850/- on A/c of unexplained credits, and Rs.1,93,376/- on interest income and Rs.1,50,000/- on expenses ... CIT(A), and argued that the copies of Fard Jamabandi, cannot be regarded as absolute proof of actual agricultural income being earned, and secondly he pointed out that the Form J, filed in support of the Jamabandi , has not#....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top