In the complex landscape of Indian legal terminology, Khariji (often spelled as Kharij or Kharji) frequently appears in contexts related to land revenue records, tenancy disputes, tribal classifications, and administrative notifications. But what exactly are the grounds of Khariji? This phrase typically refers to the legal basis, reasoning, or evidentiary foundations used in revenue entries, court decisions, or official orders involving Khariji – a term denoting exclusions, mutations, or changes in land records (as opposed to Dakhil, which means inclusions).
For property owners, tenants, litigants, and legal professionals, grasping these grounds is crucial, as they can determine ownership rights, eviction validity, or even constitutional protections. This post breaks down key judicial interpretations from landmark cases, helping you navigate this nuanced area. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Khariji originates from Bengali and revenue administration terms, commonly used in eastern and southern Indian states for land record mutations. It signifies:
- Exclusion or removal from revenue rolls (e.g., Kharij Khata – excluded land).
- Mutation fees or changes in tenancy records (e.g., transfer approvals).
- Administrative grounds for altering records, such as government claims or prohibitions.
Courts have repeatedly clarified that mere Khariji entries do not confer title. As held in a case on land classification, entries in revenue records do not confer title and must follow due process for classification changes Syed Jaffar Ahmed vs District Collector, Ranga Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 472. The grounds of Khariji must be substantiated, with the burden on authorities to prove claims like government ownership.
These terms appear in tenancy deeds, sale documents, and disputes, often requiring registration under laws like the Transfer of Property Act Hazi Esanuddin VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1981 Supreme(Cal) 96.
Land cases dominate Khariji references, where grounds involve proof of transfer, consent, or statutory compliance.
In Jalpally village land prohibition case, the court quashed a registration ban under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, ruling: The classification of land as 'Kharij Khata' does not automatically denote government ownership; the burden of proof lies with the state to establish claims over land Syed Jaffar Ahmed vs District Collector, Ranga Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 472. Key grounds required:
- Proper notification to affected parties.
- Evidence beyond mere revenue entries.
- No arbitrary prohibitory lists.
Similarly, unregistered deeds cannot justify Khariji mutations: Kharija receipts, obtained on the basis of an unregistered deed of settlement, cannot be treated as a consent by the landlord to a subdivision of the tenancy Hazi Esanuddin VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1981 Supreme(Cal) 96.
Under the AP Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, grounds for Khariji (resumption/eviction) demand specifics: Resumption of lands assigned merely based on the revenue records, without furnishing entire details like the nature of assignment... is not permissible Letter sent from Plot No. 338, Parvant Nagar, Borbanda, Hyderabad VS Collector & District Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad - 2008 Supreme(AP) 716. Courts mandate:
1. Notice to affected persons.
2. Details of assignment (free vs. market value).
3. Opportunity for representation.
A landmark Supreme Court ruling on Scheduled Tribes emphasizes strict grounds for inclusions/exclusions: It is not at all permissible to hold any enquiry or let in any evidence to decide or declare that any tribe... is included in general name even though it is not specifically mentioned in the concerned Entry in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 State Of Maharashtra VS Milind - 2000 8 Supreme 429.
Key principles:
- Notifications under Article 342(1) amended only by Parliament.
- No state/court modifications allowed.
- Stare decisis not absolute if precedents contradict Constitution (Para 24) State Of Maharashtra VS Milind - 2000 8 Supreme 429.
This rigid stance prevents dilution of tribal protections via loose Khariji-like exclusions.
In landlord-tenant suits, grounds of Khariji via pottah (lease deeds) invoke res judicata: The defendants were estopped from setting up the case of a separate tenancy based on the principle of res judicata Shib Chandra Talukdar VS Lakhi Priya Guha - 1924 Supreme(Cal) 176. Unregistered settlements fail as valid grounds for mutation Hazi Esanuddin VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1981 Supreme(Cal) 96.
Wakf deeds withstand limitation challenges: Time never runs in favor of a trustee to claim the trust property for himself Beli Ram and Brothers and others VS Chaudri Mohammad Afzal and others - 1948 Supreme(SC) 35. Khariji alienations were declared void.
Execution petitions aren't time-barred if filed within 12 years of permission: The decree or order for eviction became enforceable only on the date when the Competent Authority granted permission BHAGWATI VS J. M. MALIK - 1986 Supreme(Del) 221. Relinquishment of appeals doesn't nullify orders.
Khariji extends to procedural grounds:
- Book forfeiture notifications under CrPC Section 95 require mandatory statement of grounds: It was obligatory... to state the grounds of its opinion that the book... contained any matter punishable under Section 153A AZIZUL HAQ KAUSAR NAQUVI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - 1980 Supreme(All) 46. Vague grounds lead to quashing.
- Arrest grounds must pre-exist and be informed in writing YOGESH CHAND AGGARWAL vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI - 2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 201043.
- In POCSO cases, Dhakhil Khariji Register proves victim age Ashok Sahu S/o Late Pandaram Sahu VS State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Kasdol - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 587.
Grounds of Khariji demand rigorous proof – revenue entries alone suffice not. Here's what to watch:
- Always demand grounds: Challenge arbitrary mutations with notice rights Letter sent from Plot No. 338, Parvant Nagar, Borbanda, Hyderabad VS Collector & District Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad - 2008 Supreme(AP) 716.
- Registration is key: Unregistered deeds invalidate Khariji claims Hazi Esanuddin VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1981 Supreme(Cal) 96.
- Burden on state: For government land assertions Syed Jaffar Ahmed vs District Collector, Ranga Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 472.
- Constitutional rigidity: No judicial tinkering with tribal lists State Of Maharashtra VS Milind - 2000 8 Supreme 429.
In practice, grounds prevent abuse, ensuring fairness in land, tenancy, and admin law. Cases like Berubari (territory cession) reinforce precedent bindingness under Article 141 RAM KISHORE SEN VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 1964 Supreme(Cal) 230.
The grounds of Khariji embody due process, evidentiary rigor, and statutory fidelity across Indian law. From land exclusions to notification validity, courts consistently protect rights against unsubstantiated changes. While interpretations evolve, core principles – proof, notice, and parliamentary supremacy – endure.
This analysis draws from reported judgments for educational purposes. Legal outcomes vary by facts; seek professional advice.
References: State Of Maharashtra VS Milind - 2000 8 Supreme 429 Syed Jaffar Ahmed vs District Collector, Ranga Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 472 Letter sent from Plot No. 338, Parvant Nagar, Borbanda, Hyderabad VS Collector & District Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad - 2008 Supreme(AP) 716 Hazi Esanuddin VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1981 Supreme(Cal) 96 Beli Ram and Brothers and others VS Chaudri Mohammad Afzal and others - 1948 Supreme(SC) 35 AZIZUL HAQ KAUSAR NAQUVI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - 1980 Supreme(All) 46 Shib Chandra Talukdar VS Lakhi Priya Guha - 1924 Supreme(Cal) 176 BHAGWATI VS J. M. MALIK - 1986 Supreme(Del) 221 Ashok Sahu S/o Late Pandaram Sahu VS State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Kasdol - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 587 Rajendra Mohan Sinha VS Nimai Chand Sinha - 1967 Supreme(Gau) 29
of Rule. ... Decisions of the Division Benches of this Court in Bhaiya Ram Munda v. Anirudh Patar & others (1971(1) SCR 804) and Dina v. ... It is not even permissible to say that a tribe, sub-tribe, part of or group of any tribe or tribal community is synonymous to the ... It proceeded to hold in favour of the respondent No. 1 on other grounds to which we will refer hereafter. ... decisis on the grounds that the decisions referred to above were cons....
Wakf - Validity of Deed of Wakf - S. 11, Civil P. ... validity of a deed of wakf executed by Ghulam Rasul in 1917. ... C. - Act 6 of 1913 - S. 3, 4 - Limitation Act - Art. 120Fact of the Case: The case involved an appeal regarding the ... , Shia, Khariji, Murtaddad or Christian, he shall not only be deprived of his right to become a Mutwalli, but shall be permanently ... management thereof in the capacity of a mutwalli, and their Lo....
of limitation. ... records, without furnishing entire details like the nature of assignment, whether free of cost or for payment of market value, ... Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 1977 -Section 4(1)(b):- In view of Section 4 of the Act as amended by Amendment Act ... 2005 reiterating the grounds on which resumption orders have been passed resuming the land and ordering eviction of the petitioners ... Therefore, cons....
Petitioners not having cause of action for filing writ petitions – Only person entitled to file writ petition directed to withdraw ... another writ petition – High Court rightly holding that filing of another writ petition constituted an abuse of the process of the ... justice – Judgment of single Judge of High Court, to the extent against appellants, never challenged in writ appeal – Cannot be ... , on compassionate grounds. ... writ petitioners ena....
Singh, our ancestors, and of Umatul Zohra consists of the thakbust paper and the Dakhil Kharij proceedings." ... From 1878, after the dismissal of this application, the defendants have taken no action whatsoever for ... One of the objections to the view taken by the High Court is based on the ground that the learned judges in entertaining the second
Kharija receipts, obtained on the basis of an unregistered deed of settlement, cannot be treated as a consent by the landlord to ... transfer of the lands to the sons, and that the kharija receipts, obtained on the basis of the unregistered deed, could not be treated ... Whether the kharija receipts, obtained on the basis of the unregistered deed, could be treated as a consent by the landlord to a....
land was government property under prohibitory list - Court found no legal basis for prohibition, emphasizing that entries in revenue ... land as 'Kharij Khata' does not automatically denote government ownership; the burden of proof lies with the state to establish ... (Paras 14, 36) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The petitioner purchased land in Jalpally village ... In the writ grounds it is submitted that a khariz khata land is not Government la....
under Section 20 (2) of the Act even after the expiry of 30 days from the date of the sale, if there were reasonable grounds for ... Fact of the Case: The plaintiff purchased Kharija Taluk No. 36/4 in an auction held by the Government to recover arrears ... The plaintiff filed a suit for delivery of possession and obtained an ex parte decree. ... reasonable grounds for#....
Fact of the Case: The petitioner's appeal for renewal of Saw Mill licence was rejected due to the mill's proximity ... Petitioner's appeal for renewal of licence rejected due to proximity to forest reserve. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the rejection of the petitioner's appeal for Saw Mill licence was justified ... He submitted that there is no village named Kharija and though the legal#H....
Khatiji & Ors.] - The court discussed the denial of financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme and the limitation period for filing ... Additionally, the petitioner had no grounds to seek the relief on merits as he was already drawing higher pay than what he could ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner sought financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme, claiming repeated loss of salary ... Claiming that the denial of financial up gradation gave a recurr....
While the HAP Arabic College was still at the Khariji Madrassastage, imparting education only for theological subjects, the petitioner joined the Khariji Madrassa on 2.3.1979. ... The petitioner submits that he is serving in the college from the Khariji Madrassa stage since 2.3.1979 and has also served as the founder Superintendent w.e.f. 3.11.1991 of the Arabic College. ... But after the Khariji Madrassa transformed into a Arabic College, the petitioner was appointed as the Superintendent of the HAP Arabic College throu....
i t under Section 1 5 6 ( 3 ) o f t h e C o d e to t h e Station I n -charge, Police Station J a i j a i p u r f o r investigation i n accordance l a w a n d f o r w i t h filing charge-sheet/K'hafma {Khariji
By Ex. 2 the predecessors of the plaintiff sold their half share out of 5 biswas of patti Mahip Singh in village Anrudhpur with all their dakhili and khariji rights connected with the share sold. It may be noted that in the sale deed there is no mention of the shamilat patti.
The clause translated into English is as follows:If at any time you (grantees) transfer by sale any land (comprised in the tenure), then the transferee shall be bound to pay us (grantors) a chauth or one-fourth of the consideration money as khariji (mutation) fee; in default of
The statement of appellant was found to be false but with regard to offence bearing Crime No. 19/05 punishable under Sections 376 and 506-B of IPC, Khariji No. 1/05 dated 06.03.2005 was prepared during investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.