AI Overview

AI Overview...

Insurance Cooling Period - Summary

Main Points and Insights

Analysis and Conclusion

The insurance cooling period serves as a critical consumer protection mechanism, providing policyholders a window (commonly 15 days) to review and cancel policies without penalty. It also plays a significant role in claims related to pre-existing conditions, with many policies stipulating a waiting period (ranging from 36 months to 4 years) before such claims are accepted. Proper understanding and exercise of the cooling-off option are essential, as courts have invalidated claims where policy terms were misconstrued or where policyholders failed to utilize their rights within the stipulated period. Overall, the cooling period enhances transparency and fairness in insurance transactions, safeguarding consumer interests while clarifying the scope of coverage and exclusions.


References:

Search Results for "Insurance Cooling Period"

Shrikant Murlidhar Apte VS Life Insurance Corporation of India

India - Consumer

K.S.Chaudhari, B.C.Gupta

as well as Insurance Company—He is not exclusive agent of Insurance Company—He cannot bind Insurance Company if he gives quotation ... Commission—Insurance Agent is a Facilitator between Insurance Company and prospective policy purchaser—He is an agent of consumer ... Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Insurance—Charging of excess monthly premium—Complaint dismissed by State ... It was further alleged that complainant had option to return Insurance#HL....

New India Assurance Co.  Ltd.  VS Surinder Singh

India - Consumer

V.K.JAIN

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21 – Insurance – Mediclaim Policy – Angioplasty ... angioplasty had to be done by at PGI Chandigarh – It is true that hypertension has been concealed by complainant while obtaining insurance ... complainant, cannot be accepted – There is no evidence to prove that complainant was suffering from any coronary ailment at the time insurance ... As far as class 4.3 is concerned coronary artery disease is not one of the ailments for which cooling off period#HL_EN....

Religare Health Insurance Company Limited VS Ayush Gupta

India - Consumer

D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA

Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Insurance—Neuro surgery—State Commission directed Insurance Company to pay ... along with 9% interest, sum of Rs.20,000/- as compensation and Rs.11,000/- as litigation expenses—All out efforts are being made by Insurance ... being had to fact that procedure was performed only in year 2014, award of interest on amount spent by Complainant is not warranted—Insurance ... The stand of the Insurance Company is that since the claim made by the insured w....

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SURINDER SINGH

2020 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 907 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER

(A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections related to claims for insurance - Medical insurance claim repudiated by insurer based ... ... ... Issues: Validity of repudiation based on pre-existing disease and adherence to stipulations in insurance policy. ... (Paras 6) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The complainant obtained a health insurance policy, underwent angioplasty ... As far as class 4.3 is concerned coronary artery disease is not one of the ailments for which cooling off period#H....

Branch Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India VS Nandan Singh Nayal (Deceased)

India - Consumer

KUMKUM RANI, C. M. SINGH

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 15 – Insurance – ‘Health Protection Plus Plan’ Policy – Angioplasty ... Besides it, the complainant was aware about cooling off period and the complainant can exercise such option to decline or accept the said policy within the stipulated time, i.e. 15 days such cooling off period and could get refund of the premium amount. ... There is no denial that the complainant did not object to the policy within the free look period of 15 days. Had the com....

Branch Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India Branch Office: Kaladungi Road, Haldwani, District Nainital vs Smt. Neema Nayal W/o Late Sh. Nandan Singh Nayal

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 6530 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Ms. Kumkum Rani, CJ, Mr. C.M. Singh, J

The court found that terms of insurance policy were misconstrued and hence concluded that the claim was invalid. ... Besides it, the complainant was aware about cooling off period and the complainant can exercise such option to decline or accept the said policy within the stipulated time, i.e. 15 days such cooling off period and could get refund of the premium amount. ... There is no denial that the complainant did not object to the policy within the free look period of 15 days. Had th....

Regional Director VS Serofie Bernard Vaz

2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 1257 India - Bombay

R.C.CHAVAN

No amount of manpower is likely to achieve preserving articles by cooling them, which a freezer does, or cooling bottles for which ... Employee’s State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12) and 45-A-Factories Act, 1948, Section 2(m)-Applicability of Act, 1948. ... -In the definition of factory in Section 2(12) of Employee’s State Insurance Act (or even Section 2(m) of Factories Act). ... Respondent runs a hotel and bar which employed more than ten workers in 12 months period commencing from April 1990. R....

STAR HEALTH AND ALLIED INSURANCE vs THE INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 69578 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

of 36 months under Young Star Insurance Policy. ... However, the present case cannot be looked at only from the angle of the insurer to the effect that the policy holder is trying to get the reimbursement without waiting for the cooling period. ... The 2nd respondent had already completed the waiting period of 36 months in her individual capacity and had satisfied the conditions with regard to cooling period. Pregnancy is relatable only to females and the health of the other spouse is ....

Sri Gouri Shankar Agarwal vs The Manager, Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd.

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

In accordance with the policy terms and conditions, there is a cooling period of 4 years in respect of pre-existing diseases.  Afterwards, the Insurance Company cannot deny settlement of any claim on the ground of pre-existing disease. ... In the instant case, non-disclosure of a surgery 27 years back which had no connection with the present medical condition of the Appellant No. 2 and further non-disclosure of hypothyroidism which too got covered automatically following expiry of the cooling period ....

Dr. Dattaram Bhaskar Dessai vs Life Insurance Corporation

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 262 India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Adv. Ms. Rachna Anna Maria Gonsalves, Member

(A) Life Insurance Corporation of India Act, 1956 - Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Act, 1999 - Consumer ... That the Complainant had an option to avail of the cooling period, if they were not satisfied with the policy that they had availed, but instead failed to do so and did not discontinue the policy. v. ... He then pointed out that the cooling period is an option and the Complainants had the option to discontinue the policy if they were not satisfied. He also added that the C....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top