AI Overview...
-
Jitendra Singh Flora - Framed charges on 5-10-1999 against Jitendra Singh Flora; involved in legal proceedings related to criminal cases and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Several judgments and legal arguments have referenced his case, indicating its significance in legal jurisprudence Jitendra Singh Flora VS Ravikant Talwar - Dishonour Of Cheque, JITENDRA SINGH FLORA VS RAVIKANT TALWAR - Madhya Pradesh, Jitendra Singh Flora VS Ravikant Talwar - Crimes.
-
Legal Principles - The case has been cited to illustrate that when a cheque is issued solely for security purposes, the drawer may not be held liable under Section 138 of the Act, as established in Jitendra Singh Flora v. Ravikant Talwar 2001 (1) MPLJ 229 Rashid Khan VS Sharda Shrivastava - Madhya Pradesh.
-
Court Rulings - The Supreme Court and High Court have emphasized that certain judgments, including those in Jitendra Singh Flora's case, are based on clear legal principles that influence the interpretation of liability under Section 138, and some judgments relied upon by petitioners are deemed not germane to the case Mandadi Ram Reddy VS State Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh, Mandadi Ram Reddy VS State of A. P. - Dishonour Of Cheque.
-
Case Precedents - The case has been referred to in various judgments involving criminal proceedings and the applicability of legal provisions related to cheques and security, reinforcing its importance in legal debates over liability and procedural aspects Shamim Bano VS Shabana Khan @ Soni - Chhattisgarh, Shakuntala Devappa VS B. R. Ravishankar - Dishonour Of Cheque.
-
Judicial Disposition - In some instances, proceedings against Jitendra Singh Flora have been quashed, and cases have been disposed of based on legal arguments and precedents, indicating the case's influence on case law and judicial discretion Mahinder Singh Bhasin VS Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Jitendra Singh Flora's case is a significant legal reference concerning criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, especially regarding cheques issued for security. The courts have highlighted that issuing a cheque as security may exempt the drawer from liability, and the case has been instrumental in shaping jurisprudence on this issue. Multiple judgments and legal discussions underscore the importance of understanding the context and purpose of cheque issuance in determining liability.
Search Results for "Jitendra Singh Flora"
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
S.C.PANDEY
Thereafter, it framed the charge on 5-10-1999 against the applicant Jitendra Singh F'lora. ... 5. Shri Ranjan Banerjee learned counsel for the applicant in this revision has argued that no offence under Section !
2000 0 Supreme(MP) 694 • India - Madhya Pradesh
S.C.PANDEY
Thereafter, it framed the charge on 5-10-1999 against the applicant jitendra Singh Flora.
• India - Crimes
S.C.PANDEY
Thereafter, it framed the charge on 5-10-1999 against the applicant Jitendra Singh F'lora. 5. Shri Ranjan Banerjee learned counsel for the applicant in this revision has argued that no offence under Section !
2007 0 Supreme(MP) 451 • India - Madhya Pradesh
B.M.GUPTA
Hence as observed in Jitendra Singh Flora v. Ravikant Talwar [2001 (1) MPLJ 229] he cannot be held responsible under section 138 of the Act. ... 3. ... Although, the facts of the case of Jitendra Singh Flora (supra) are slightly different, however, it has been observed that once a cheque' has been issued for the purpose of security, drawer is not liable under section 138 of the Act. ... 6.
2003 0 Supreme(AP) 137 • India - Andhra Pradesh
T.CH.SURYA RAO
" ... ( 11 ) IN view of this clear law enunciated by the Apex, Court, the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court sought to be relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners in Jitendra Singh Flora v.
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
T.CH.SURYA RAO
High Court sought to be relied upon by the learned Counsel of the petitioners in Jitendra Singh Flora v. Ravikant Talwar,4 is not germane for consideration. ... 12.
• India - Crimes
SURYA RAO
In view of this clear law enunciated by the Apex Court the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court sought to be relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners in Jitendra Singh flora v. Ravikant Talwar4 is not germane for consideration.
2019 0 Supreme(Chh) 515 • India - Chhattisgarh
RAM PRASANNA SHARMA
Kanishka Kapoor @ Nikki & another reported in, 2009 AIR Noc 2327 (BOM.), Jitendra Singh Flora Vs. Ravikant Talwar reported in, (2001) 1 MPLJ 229, Ramkrishna Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Ahmednagar Vs.
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
N.ANANDA
Jitendra Singh Flora v. Ravikant Talwar, II (2001) BC 699 ... XV. Bhageerathy v. V. Beena & another, 1992(3) Crimes 663 ... XVI. Anirudhan v. Philip Jacob & another, 2006 Cri. L.J. 3866 (Ker.).
2015 0 Supreme(MP) 1053 • India - Madhya Pradesh
N.K.GUPTA
Learned counsel for the applicant has also placed his reliance upon the order passed by the single Bench of this Court in case of Jitendra Singh Flora Vs. ... On the basis of the aforesaid discussion, the petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant Mahinder Singh Bhasin is hereby allowed. Proceedings of criminal complaint case No. 2382/2009 pending before JMFC, Narsinghpur is hereby quashed.
Filter by Legal Phrase
