AI Overview...
Landmark Judgments on Polygraph Tests in India
Use and Legality of Polygraph Tests
- Illegal and Unconstitutional: The Supreme Court has declared the use of polygraph tests, along with narcoanalysis and brain mapping, as illegal when conducted without the suspect's consent. These tests are also subject to strict guidelines laid down by the National Human Rights Commission to protect individual rights. The judgments emphasize that such tests cannot be imposed involuntarily, reinforcing the constitutional right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3). Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Rajasthan, Sr. Sephy, D/o Joseph VS Central Bureau Of Investigation Kochi - Kerala, P. J. Joseph VS State of Kerala - Dishonour Of Cheque
Right to Silence and Personal Liberties
- Evolving Legal Principles: Courts have recognized that involuntary administration of polygraph and related techniques infringes upon the right to silence and personal liberty. The landmark judgment in 2010 (AIR 2010 SC 1974) further strengthened the protection of these rights, aligning Indian jurisprudence with international standards. Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Rajasthan, Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Crimes, P. J. Joseph VS State of Kerala - Dishonour Of Cheque
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence
- Not Evidence per Se: Indian courts have held that results from polygraph tests are not admissible as evidence because they are based on physiological responses and not voluntary statements. They are considered inferential and do not constitute testimony. The Supreme Court has explicitly barred the use of such test results in evidentiary proceedings to prevent violation of constitutional rights. Sr. Sephy, D/o Joseph VS Central Bureau Of Investigation Kochi - Kerala, TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - Supreme Court
Guidelines and Judicial Stance
- Strict Guidelines and Judicial Oversight: The courts have mandated adherence to guidelines issued by authorities like the NHRC, ensuring that polygraph and related tests are conducted ethically and with consent. The courts have also scrutinized the relevance and reliability of such tests in criminal proceedings. Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Rajasthan, Sr. Sephy, D/o Joseph VS Central Bureau Of Investigation Kochi - Kerala
International and Constitutional Perspectives
- Global Jurisprudence and Constitutional Safeguards: Indian judgments have incorporated international developments, emphasizing that scientific techniques like polygraph tests should be voluntary and non-intrusive, respecting constitutional protections under Articles 20(3) and 21. This approach underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights against coercive investigative methods. P. J. Joseph VS State of Kerala - Dishonour Of Cheque, Joseph VS State of Kerala - Kerala
Analysis and Conclusion
Indian jurisprudence has progressively established that polygraph tests, along with narcoanalysis and brain mapping, cannot be used involuntarily or as evidence without strict adherence to constitutional rights and guidelines. The courts have consistently emphasized the importance of individual liberty, privacy, and the right against self-incrimination, making such tests inadmissible and illegal unless conducted voluntarily and with proper consent. These landmark judgments mark a significant evolution in balancing investigative needs with human rights protections.
References: - Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Rajasthan - Panner Selvam VS State rep. by Inspector of Police C. B. I / SCB - Madras - Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Supreme Court - Selvi VS State of Karnataka - Crimes - Sr. Sephy, D/o Joseph VS Central Bureau Of Investigation Kochi - Kerala - SR. SEPHY vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Kerala - Joseph VS State of Kerala - Kerala - P. J. Joseph VS State of Kerala - Dishonour Of Cheque - TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - Supreme Court - JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - Supreme Court
Search Results for "Landmark Judgments on Polygraph Tests in India"
2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 504 • India - Rajasthan
K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.M.PANCHAL
cases — Preservation of individual liberties — Held — Protecting Human Rights — Declared (i) Use of narcoanalysis, brainmapping and polygraph ... tests on suspects "illegal", (ii) Tests cannot be conducted on any person, whether an accused or a suspect, without their consent ... and (iii) Investigating agencies to follow strictly guidelines laid down by the National Human Right Commission in conducting the polygraphy ... This event is regarded as an important landmark in the evolution of the ‘right to s....
2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 4864 • India - Madras
S.TAMILVANAN
The Court also highlighted the significance of DNA tests and the applicability of guidelines for conducting tests on the accused. ... However, I am of the view that the aforesaid guidelines given in the landmark Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court are no way applicable to decide the discharge petition on hand, since the case is not based on materials collected "Nacroanalysis technique" or "Brain Electrical Activation Profile" test on ... In Union of India vs. ... In light of the preceding discussion, we ....
2010 3 Supreme 558 • India - Supreme Court
K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J. M. PANCHAL
(Para 210) ... Polygraph tests- The theory behind polygraph tests is ... (Para 10) ... Polygraph tests- Limitations of- Polygraph tests have several ... Constitution of India,1950- Article 20(3) -Involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, such as narcoanalysis, polygraph ... In one of the impugned judgments, it was reasoned that all citizens have an obligation to co- operate with ongoing investiga....
• India - Crimes
K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.M.PANCHAL
(Para 10) ... (vii) Polygraph tests- Limitations of- Polygraph tests ... (Para 210) ... (vi) Polygraph tests- The theory behind polygraph tests ... Constitution of India,1950- Article 20(3) -Involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, such as narcoanalysis, polygraph ... This event is regarded as an important landmark in the evolution of the ‘right to silence’. ... In one of the impugned #HL_STAR....
2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 996 • India - Kerala
ALEXANDER THOMAS
, brain mapping tests, polygraph tests, etc. shall not be allowed to be adduced in evidence by the Special Judge concerned. ... been proposed by the respondent CBI to adduce evidence with respect to the matters in relation to narco analysis test and other tests ... which are in matters in relation to alleged disclosures said to have been made by the petitioners in relation to narco analysis tests ... A-1 was subjected to polygraph test on 2.4.1996 and 3.4.1996, narco analysis on 4.8.20....
2019 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 94357 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
449, 302, 201 read with Section 34 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27 - Question of admissibility of narco analysis and related tests ... results - The petitioners sought to quash the order allowing prosecution to examine witnesses pertaining to narco analysis tests ... A-1 was subjected to polygraph test on 2.4.1996 and 3.4.1996, narco analysis on 4.8.2007, brain mapping on 4.9.2007. Again he was subjected to polygraph test on 30.1.2008 and 31.1.2008. ... Long before all the aforementioned 3 accused persons were arraigne....
2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 1321 • India - Kerala
ALEXANDER THOMAS
: AIR 2010 SC 1974). the constitutional right under Article 20(3) has taken further great strides and relying upon the international developments and international Jurisprudence, the Apex Court held that in voluntary administration of either narcoanalysis technique, polygraph
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
ALEXANDER THOMAS
= AIR 2010 SC 1974, the constitutional right under Article 20(3) has taken further great strides and relying upon the international developments and international Jurisprudence, the Apex Court held that in voluntary administration of either narcoanalysis technique, polygraph ... The view expressed above is well supported by various judgments apart from one relied upon by the appellants and in particular following judgments: - ... 1. AIR 1947 Bombay 345, Abdul Kader Allarakhia v. Emperor. ... 2.
2021 2 Supreme 1 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA, INDIRA BANERJEE
It could also be argued that tests such as polygraph examination and the BEAP test do not involve a "positive volitional act" on part of the test subject and hence their results should not be treated as testimony. ... The results obtained from polygraph examination or a BEAP test are not in the nature of oral or written statements. Instead, inferences are drawn from the measurement of physiological responses recorded during the performance of these tests. ... In light of the preceding discussion, we are of the view that ....
2017 0 Supreme(SC) 772 • India - Supreme Court
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, S. A. BOBDE, R. K. AGRAWAL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, A. M. SAPRE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. ABDUL NAZEER
(bp) Interpretation of statute – Constitution – External aids – Foreign judgments ... Registrar, Supreme Court of India (2014) 9 SCC 737. In between this period, several landmark judgments were rendered by this Court. ... It has been the subject matter of judicial interpretation by this Court along with other Articles of Part III in several landmark cases beginning from A.K.Gopalan vs. ... We must proceed in accordance with the law laid down in the judgments of the Supreme Court of #HL....
Filter by Legal Phrase
