AI Overview

AI Overview...

#ManishKumarPandey, #IndianCourtCases, #LegalRulings

Manish Kumar Pandey: Key Legal Cases and Insights


In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, names like Manish Kumar Pandey frequently appear in court records, either as a litigant, advocate, or in related proceedings. Whether representing clients in high-stakes criminal matters, service law disputes, or family law cases, these references highlight diverse legal issues. This post analyzes notable judgments mentioning Manish Kumar Pandey, drawing from Supreme Court and High Court decisions. Note: This is general information based on public judgments and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance, as outcomes vary by facts.


Prominent Criminal Law Cases


Criminal proceedings form a significant portion of cases linked to Manish Kumar Pandey. These often involve procedural nuances under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and substantive offenses under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).


CrPC Section 156(3) and Section 195 Applicability


In a key Allahabad High Court ruling, applicants sought to quash a charge-sheet under sections like 193, 195, 197, 420, 471/34, and 109 IPC, arguing bar under Section 195 CrPC. The court clarified: section 195 Cr.P.C. does not control the power of the Magistrate to entertain an application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and direct Police to register a report and thereafter make investigation. Section 195 applies only post-cognizance under Section 190, not during investigation. The field of investigation of any cognizable offence is exclusively within the domain of investigating agencies Baleshwar Tiwari VS State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 2362. Heard by Sri Manish Kumar Pandey as counsel, this underscores magistrates' powers without Section 195 interference.


Dowry, Cruelty, and Summoning Powers


Another case involved dowry offenses under IPC Sections 498A, 420, etc., and Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioners challenged summoning under Section 319 CrPC, claiming error as they were already accused. The court held: Only those persons can be summoned, who were not accused. Dismissing proceedings, it noted the Sessions Judge's error in rejecting discharge under Section 227 Manish Kumar Pandey son of Laxmi Nidhi Pandey VS State of Bihar - 2016 Supreme(Pat) 1134. Manish Kumar Pandey appeared here too.


Quashing Charge-Sheets in Fraud Cases


In fraud allegations under IPC Sections 419, 420, etc., and IT Act, an application to quash was filed by Manish Kumar. The court refused, stating: Court would not embark upon an inquiry as it is function of Trial Judge... case in hand cannot be said to be exceptional as it discloses prima facie commission of a cognizable offence Manish Kumar Pandey VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. - 2023 Supreme(All) 505. This illustrates High Courts' restraint under Section 482 CrPC.


Service Law and Employment Disputes


Service matters frequently feature Manish Kumar Pandey, addressing terminations, appointments, and pensions.


Irregular Appointments and Regularization


A Bihar case challenged Class IV appointments in Animal Husbandry without employment exchange notification, violating Articles 14 and 16. The Supreme Court ruled: If the initial appointments are found to be illegal per se, direction for reinstatement with consequential benefits cannot be approved. Equality demands open advertisement; ad hoc hires from exchanges only in exigencies State of Bihar VS Upendra Narayan Singh - 2009 2 Supreme 672. Letters Patent Appeals were dismissed.


Termination Without Notice


Petitioner appointed as District Accounts Manager faced termination sans show-cause notice. The court set aside the order: Order of termination not preceded by any show cause notice to petitioner—Impugned order set aside with liberty to move afresh Manish Kumar Pandey VS State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Rural Development, Ranchi - 2013 Supreme(Jhk) 1150.


Pension Distribution Among Heirs


In a retirement benefits dispute, legal heirs—including Urmila Pandey, Neeraj Pandey, Manish Kumar Pandey—reached a mutual agreement. The court directed payment per the agreement Manish Kumar Pandey VS State Of Bihar - 2005 Supreme(Pat) 527.


Family and Matrimonial Law


Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage


Though not directly naming Manish Kumar Pandey as party, related snippets discuss Hindu Marriage Act divorce on mental cruelty grounds. In Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, the Supreme Court dissolved a marriage wrecked beyond salvage: Where the marriage has been wrecked beyond the hope of salvage, public interest... lies in the recognition of the fact. It recommended legislating irretrievable breakdown as a ground Naveen Kohli VS Neelu Kohli - 2006 2 Supreme 627. Cross-references appear in Pandey matters.


Other Notable Areas


Motor Vehicles Act: Driving License Endorsements


A pivotal ruling held: A driver who is having a licence to drive 'light motor vehicle' and is driving 'transport vehicle' of that class is not required additionally to obtain an endorsement. Light motor vehicles under Section 2(21) include such transport up to 7500 kg GVW Mukund Dewangan VS Oriental Insurance Company Limited - 2017 Supreme(SC) 894.


Consumer Protection and Interest Awards


Consumer Forums awarding 18% interest on deficiencies by authorities was scrutinized: Interest must be granted at the current rate... based on a finding of loss or injury. Varies case-to-case GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS BALBIR SINGH.


Policy Decisions and Judicial Review


In industrial policy challenges, courts deferred: Policy decision is in the domain of the executive... Court should not question the efficacy... so long the same does not offend any provision M. P. Oil Extraction: K. N. Oil Industries VS State Of M. P. - 1997 7 Supreme 267. BALCO disinvestment was upheld as economic policy Balco Employees Union VS Union Of India - 2001 8 Supreme 660.


TADA and Terrorism Appeals


Early cases under TADA Acts addressed appeals: Appeal filed by accused in High Court should stand automatically transferred... accused should be provided a counsel of his choice Kartar Singh: Kripa Shankar Rai VS State Of Punjab - 1994 Supreme(SC) 1.


Key Takeaways



Manish Kumar Pandey's involvement spans counsel roles (e.g., heard by Sri Manish Kumar Pandey) and parties, reflecting broad legal practice. These cases illustrate evolving Indian law on procedure, equity, and policy.


Disclaimer: Legal outcomes depend on specific facts. This analysis synthesizes public judgments for educational purposes only. Seek professional advice for your situation.


Word count approximation: 950

Search Results for "Manish Kumar Pandey: Key Legal Cases Analyzed"

Kartar Singh: Kripa Shankar Rai VS State Of Punjab - 1994 Supreme(SC) 1

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 1 India - Supreme Court

S.C.AGRAWAL, R.M.SAHAI, M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY, S.R.PANDIAN

appeal filed by accused in High Court should stand automatically transferred - Court opinion in such cases accused should be provided ... Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 121, 121-A, 122 and 123 - Golden Temple case ... Provisions) Act of 1973 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Criminal Law Act of 1973 - Section 62 - Ireland Emergency Provisions Act, 1978 - U.P. ... A.K.M. ... State of M.P.{(1977) 1....

S. P. Gupta: V. M. Tarkunde: J. L. Kalra: Iqbal M. Chagla: Lily Thomas: A. Rajappa: Union Of India: D. N. Pandey: R. Prasad Sinha VS Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Shivshankar: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Subramanian: Union Of India: K. B. N. Singh - 1981 Supreme(SC) 511

1981 0 Supreme(SC) 511 India - Supreme Court

A.C.GUPTA, V.D.TULZAPURKAR, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, R.S.PATHAK, P.N.BHAGWATI, D.A.DESAI, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH

Pandey in which Mr K.B.N. ... Pandey and others in which Justice K. B. N. Singh, chief justice of Patna High Court has now been transposed as petitioner 3. ... Pandey, Advocate, filed C. W. J. C.

Balco Employees Union VS Union Of India - 2001 8 Supreme 660

2001 8 Supreme 660 India - Supreme Court

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, B.N.KIRPAL

Cabinet Committee on Disinvestment was forwarded by the Minister of Mines, Government of India to Shri Tara Chand Viyogi, President, M.P ... The ratio of the decision in Samatha’a case is inapplicable here as the legal provisions here are different. ... procedure has been followed (see paras 61 to 65)—There is no lack of transparency (Para 66)—Transfer of land is not in violation of the M.P ... In Sachidanand Pandey and Another vs. State of West Bengal and Others, (19....

Naveen Kohli VS Neelu Kohli - 2006 2 Supreme 627

2006 2 Supreme 627 India - Supreme Court

B.N.AGARWAL, A.K.MATHUR, DALVEER BHANDARI

The marriage becomes a fiction, though supported by a legal tie. ... The appellant has also filed cases against the respondent. ... This amount would include Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lacs with interest) deposited by the appellant on the direction of the Trial ... This Court in the case of Savitri Pandey vs. ... Prem Chandra Pandey reported in (2002) 2 SCC 73, stated that mental cruelty is the conduct of other spouse ... In Durga P#HL_END....

Mukund Dewangan VS Oriental Insurance Company Limited - 2017 Supreme(SC) 894

2017 0 Supreme(SC) 894 India - Supreme Court

ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Fact of the Case: None Finding of the Court: A driver who is having a licence to drive 'light motor vehicle ... In that case, the appellant was the owner of a truck, light motor vehicle, which was insured with the respondent Insurance Company ... The respondent also does not say that any permit was granted to the appellant for plying the vehicle as a transport vehicle under ... ... K- First-aid."

Manish Kumar Pandey VS State Of Bihar - 2005 Supreme(Pat) 527

2005 0 Supreme(Pat) 527 India - Patna

MRIDULA MISHRA

The legal heirs are-Urmila Pandey (the first wife) Neeraj @ Praveen Pandey and Dheeraj Pandey sons from first wife, Manish Kumar ... Pandey and Kumari Kamini Pandey, son and daughter from second wife. ... been annexed alongwith the counter-affidavit filed by the State respondent no. 5.

Manish Kumar Pandey son of Laxmi Nidhi Pandey VS State of Bihar - 2016 Supreme(Pat) 1134

2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 1134 India - Patna

RAKESH KUMAR

– Only those persons can be summoned, who were not accused – In view of fact that petitioners were accused and they were subsequently ... , 319 and 482 – Dowry offence – Cruelty, cheating and rape – Cognizance – Rejection of petition seeking discharge from criminal case ... Sessions Judge, while dismissing petition for discharge, has committed serious error – Impugned order and proceeding against petitioner ... Rajnish Kumar Pandey, who was arrayed as accused no. 2 in....

Manish Kumar Pandey VS State Of U. P.  Thru.  Prin.  Secy.  Home Lko.  - 2023 Supreme(All) 505

2023 0 Supreme(All) 505 India - Allahabad

SHAMIM AHMED

threshold of quashing of proceeding of case and summoning order case in hand cannot be said to be exceptional as it discloses prima ... Advocate General assisted by learned for State-opposite party perused record – Instant application has been filed by applicant-Manish ... Kumar for quashing of charge-sheet – Held, Court would not embark upon an inquiry as it is function of Trial Judge Court interference ... The instant application has been filed by the applicant-Manish#HL_EN....

Manish Kumar Pandey VS State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Rural Development, Ranchi - 2013 Supreme(Jhk) 1150

2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1150 India - Jharkhand

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner was appointed on 17.04.2010 pursuant to an advertisement issued on 10.04.2010

JEEWAN PRAKASH PANDEY vs MANISH KUMAR VERMA, D.M. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 6362

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 6362 India - Allahabad High Court

CONTEMPT OF COURT - DISOBEDIENCE OF COURT ORDER - WILFUL AND DELIBERATE - NOTICE ISSUED Fact of the Case: The applicant ... Finding of the Court: Applicant :- Jeewan Prakash Pandey Opposite Party :- Manish Kumar Verma ... , D.M. ... Counsel for Applicant :- Parmatma Nand Ojha,Abhishek Shekhar Ojha,Anurag Kumar

MAHESH PANDEY ALIAS MAHESH PRASAD PANDEY AND ANR vs The State Of Jharkhand

India - Jharkhand

Mahesh Pandey @ Mahesh Prasad Pandey 2. Manish Pandey @ Manish Kr. Pandey... ... @ Mahesh Prasad Pandey and Manish Pandey @ Manish Kr. ... opposed by Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned Additional PP for the State. ... Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ........

 Ishwarchand Vs. Board Of Revenue And 4 Others - 2019 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 19

2019 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 19 India - High Court of Allahabad

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.

:- Manish,Gajala Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Durga Charan Singh Yadav,Manish Kumar Pandey,Manoj Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. ... ,Manish Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Durga Charan Singh Yadav,Manish Kumar Pandey,Manoj Kumar Yadav and Case :- WRIT - B No. - 41 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ishwarchand Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. ... :- Manish,Gaja....

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY @ AJAY PANDEY Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

India - Patna High Court

Dinesh Kumar Singh, J

co-accused Manish Kumar. ... Ananad Kumar @ Ananad Kumar Pandey @ Ananad pandey Son of Kapil Muni Pandey Resident of Village - Motishari Bhawan, Pokhana Tilha, P.S.- Deoghar, Distt.- Deoghar, Jharkhand. ... ... ... AJAY KUMAR PANDEY @ AJAY PANDEY Son of Kapil Muni Pandey Resident of Village - Motishari Bhawan, Pokhana Tilha, P.S.- Deoghar, Distt.- Deoghar, Jharkhand. 2. ... The prosec....

ASHISH KUMAR BAGGA VS. ANUP BAGGA & ORS. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10709

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10709 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Manish, Advocates for D1 to D4. 40 + CS(OS) 364/2024, I.A.10210/2024, I.A.46796/2024, I.A.4723/2025 & I.A.21598/2025 SH SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi with Ms. Anjali Pandey and Mr. Sumit, Advocates. ... Manish, Advocates for D1 to D4. + CS(OS) 283/2024, I.A.18809/2025 & I.A.4708/2025 SHRI RAJ JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi with Ms. Anjali Pandey and Mr. Sumit, Advocates. ... Manish, Advocates for D1 to D4. 38 + CS(OS) 257/2024, I.A.18811/2025....

NIRANJAN KUMAR PANDEY AND ORS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP - 2017 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 87

2017 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 87 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)

BANWARI LAL SHARMA

Pandey, Ranjeet Kumar, Manish Kumar and Dharmendra Kumar. ... (1) Niranjan Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Kaushalendra Pandey (2) Ranjeet Kumar S/o Shri Ram Keval Mehto (3) Manish Kumar S/o Shri Brij Kishore (4) Dharmendra Kumar S/o Shri Lallan Prasad in FIR No. 22/2017 registered at Police Station Bagru District Jaipur (West), shall be released on bail ... JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Ord....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top