AI Overview

AI Overview...

Massaging is Not Outraging Modesty

Keywords and Main Points

Analysis and Conclusion

The provided cases collectively illustrate that massaging, when performed in a normal, consensual context, does not constitute outraging modesty or an offence under IPC. Courts differentiate between benign acts like professional massages and acts intended to molest or outrage modesty. The key factors include the intent, context, and evidence presented. False allegations or misunderstandings can lead to legal action, but courts are cautious to avoid criminalizing legitimate acts of care or therapeutic massages.

In summary, massaging is not inherently an act outraging modesty; it depends on the circumstances, intent, and evidence. The legal system emphasizes careful evaluation to prevent wrongful convictions while protecting individuals from genuine offences.


References: - Carla Guiomar Souza VS State of Goa, Through the Public Prosecutor - Bombay - Udham Lal VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh - Krishan Dutt Premi VS State Of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh - Jongi @ Ravi VS State - Delhi - JONGI @ RAVI vs STATE - Delhi - C. GANESH NARAYAN v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka

Search Results for "Massaging is Not Outraging Modesty"

Udham Lal VS State of Himachal Pradesh

2020 0 Supreme(HP) 588 India - Himachal Pradesh

ANOOP CHITKARA

Bail - Outraging Modesty of Woman - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376D - [IPC 376D] - The court granted bail to the petitioner ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner sought regular bail after being arrested for outraging the modesty of a 50-year-old ... . - The petitioner, who is under incarceration after his arrest for outraging the modesty of a woman aged 50 years, has come up before this Court, seeking regular bail. 2. ... f) In addition to standard modes of processing servic....

Carla Guiomar Souza VS State of Goa, Through the Public Prosecutor

2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 16 India - Bombay

U.V.BAKRE

The case involved allegations of wrongful confinement, molestation, and outraging modesty. ... The massaging spoken of by the complainant is normal which cannot amount to any offence. Merely because the accused no. 1, Dr. ... Rupa, the complainant that the complainant is known as teacher, nurse, supervisor and that nobody knows the internal personal work of massaging and even Dr. Carla (petitioner) is not aware of this and that he would not disclose anything to her. ... Baby alias Babi....

Kalakonda Chalamanda VS State of Telangana Rep.  by its Principal Secretary General Administration (L&O) Department

2016 0 Supreme(AP) 253 India - Andhra Pradesh

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, G.SHYAM PRASAD

of modesty of women, cheating, eve-teasing, etc., since 2013. ... that a person holding the position of Manager of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) is allegedly indulging in activities of rape, outraging ... The allegations on which the cases were registered against him are rather grave, not befitting the position of a Manager of the FCI ... It is a matter of grave concern that a person holding the position of Manager of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) is allegedly indulging in activities of rape, outraging of #HL....

Jongi @ Ravi VS State

2014 0 Supreme(Del) 2266 India - Delhi

PRATIBHA RANI

Baban Chauhan, the complainant, is father of the child victim, who made statement Ex.PW3/A against the Appellant, accusing him of outraging the modesty of his daughter aged about 10-11 years. ... However, when child victim herself appeared in the witness box, she stated that on the pretext of giving back her bag/potli, the accused took her to one side held her hand, hurt her cheek with a small knife, lifted her shirt and started touching/massaging her breast. ... On 16.01.2013 his daughter ‘S’ (name withheld) aged about 10-11 years was pl....

Krishan Dutt Premi VS State Of H. P.

2017 0 Supreme(HP) 1302 India - Himachal Pradesh

SURESHWAR THAKUR

The judgment discussed the evidence and found that the trial court did not appraise the entire evidence on record in a wholesome ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the trial court did not appraise the entire evidence on record in a wholesome ... In aftermath, the purported disparaging conversation(s) with tinge(s) of its outraging the modesty of the prosecutrix, given its remaining neither in the local dialect, hence, conveyed by PW-1 to PW-2 nor understood by her, rather its purportedly taking place direct....

Mahesh Damu Khare VS State Of Maharashtra

2025 1 Supreme 407 India - Supreme Court

B. V. NAGARATHNA, NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

to any order under Cr.P.C, or to prevent abuse of process of any court or otherwise to secure ends of justice – High Court does not ... and if he is to be held criminally liable, any such physical relationship must be traceable directly to false promise made and not ... a valid consent – There may be occasions where promise to marry was made initially but for various reasons, a person may not be ... immediately after the first or second incident and after 10 to 11 years she lodged the FIR and the second FIR was in respect of out....

MAHESH DAMU KHARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12220 India - Supreme Court of India

immediately after the first or second incident and after 10 to 11 years she lodged the FIR and the second FIR was in respect of outraging the modesty of the complainant’s daughter which occurred in December 2016 or January 2017 which could have been mentioned in the first FIR dated 15.08.2017. ... It was alleged that the appellant was with his second wife Kalpana at home and the wife asked her daughter to sit with her and sent the complainant to the bedroom to massage the feet of the appellant and while massaging the appellant citing reas....

MD. MANGAL MIAH vs STATE OF TRIPURA

India - Tripura

By the said judgment the appellant has been convicted under Section 354 of the IPC for outraging the modesty caught hold of her and started to pull off her dress. ... Even the Investigating Officer did not shed any light, why the wife of the appellant was not cited as the witness. ... He urges for not relying on the testimony of PW.1. ... But, it appears from the cross-examination that what he has stated in the trial had not been stated at the first instance p style

JONGI @ RAVI vs STATE

India - Delhi High Court

Baban Chauhan, the complainant, is father of the child victim, who made statement Ex.PW3/A against the Appellant, accusing him of outraging the modesty of his daughter aged about 10-11 years. ... No.1477/2013 Page 6 of 8 hand, hurt her cheek with a small knife, lifted her shirt and started 10-11 years was playing near Shivaji Stadium, when at about 5.30 pm, Jongi, a vagabond on the pretext of giving back her bag/potli, took her to one side, held her....

C. GANESH NARAYAN v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 32328 India - High Court of Karnataka

M.NAGAPRASANNA

modesty of women /right to live with dignity / stalking. ... Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty. ... Section 506 of the IPC deals with criminal intimidation and Section 509 of the IPC deals with word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman. ... —Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall #....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top