Accessing the Nagpur High Court cause list today is crucial for lawyers, litigants, and parties involved in cases at the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench. The cause list outlines daily hearings, mentions, and scheduled matters, helping you stay ahead in your legal proceedings. In this post, we break down how to find the latest High Court Nagpur cause list today, what it includes, and insights from recent court activities based on available records. Note: This is general information for educational purposes and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
A cause list (also called a daily board or hearing list) is a public schedule published by courts listing cases set for hearing on a particular day. For the Nagpur High Court—officially the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court—it details:
- Fresh matters for admission or urgent hearings.
- Regular hearings, revisions, writ petitions, and appeals.
- Mentionings for directions, adjournments, or listings.
Timely checking the cause list prevents missed hearings, which can lead to adverse orders. For instance, delays in listing can affect case progress, as seen in procedural matters where courts direct List this matter for further consideration on date. (SHASHIKANT SHAMRAO BHOYAR vs BHUSHAN GOVIND RAMTEKE AND OTHERS)
Finding the Nagpur High Court cause list today is straightforward via official channels:
1. Official Website: Visit the Bombay High Court portal (bombayhighcourt.nic.in) and select Nagpur Bench. Navigate to Cause List > Today's Cause List.
2. E-Courts Services: Use ecourts.gov.in for digital cause lists, case status, and virtual hearings.
3. High Court App: Download the official Bombay HC app for mobile access.
4. Physical Access: Cause lists are displayed at the Nagpur Bench courthouse.
Pro Tip: Check early morning as lists update frequently. Recent examples show matters like This matter was called on for hearing today with directions for next listings (MANISHA vs GHANSHAM).
From court records:
- Non-listing due to errors: Due to his mistake, the writ petition was not marked in the cause list. (KU. VARSHA RUPRAOJI TIKHILE vs BHAUSAHEB SABNE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THR. SECTY., BULDHANA and 3 OTRS)
- Directions for compliance: Mutation entries in the 7/12 extract and revenue record of rights in respect of petitioner's name be carried out within a period of 6 weeks from today. (ALIMUDDIN S/O MAHBUB MUKHADAM AND 7 OTHERS vs SHABBIR AHMED S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD @ CHANGU AND 13 OTHERS)
- Costs and receipts: Produce a receipt from legal services committees. (SHASHIKANT SHAMRAO BHOYAR vs BHUSHAN GOVIND RAMTEKE AND OTHERS)
Recent snippets highlight active dockets at the Nagpur Bench:
- Writ Petitions: Matters like WRIT PETITION NO.4590 OF 2023 listed for further consideration on 23rd December, 2025. (SMT. BHAGYASHRI WD/O. BHOJRAM GAHANE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY DEPT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT MUMBAI AND OTHERS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248558)
- Urgent Mentions: Today, learned Advocate for the applicant has... with costs imposed. (SHASHIKANT SHAMRAO BHOYAR vs BHUSHAN GOVIND RAMTEKE AND OTHERS)
- Supreme Court Links: Appeals from Nagpur, e.g., NEXT CAUSE LIST AS PER DIRECTIONS FROM MENTIONING BRANCH. (MANISHA vs GHANSHAM)
Nagpur Bench handles diverse cases, often referencing CrPC and CPC. For example:
- Quashing Proceedings: Courts distinguish quashing from compounding, noting Quashing a proceeding becoming futile after compromise and compounding of offence - Two different things. (GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1)
- Inherent Powers: Under CrPC Section 482, used for justice, especially in Section 307 IPC cases where settlements lead to quashing despite serious injuries. (Narinder Singh VS State of Punjab - 2014 2 Supreme 642)
In cause lists, such matters appear for hearings on compromises or quashing petitions.
Bullet points from records:
- Long-standing disputes resolved via settlements, leading to FIR quashing. (Narinder Singh VS State of Punjab - 2014 2 Supreme 642)
- Cause lists direct compliances like affidavits or document deposits. (GOPAL BRICKS THR. ITS PROP. GOPAL DEVIDAS PRAJAPATI AND ANR vs STATE OF MAH. THR ITS SECTY. AND ORS)
Litigants face hurdles:
- Technical Glitches: Websites may lag; cross-check with helplines.
- Bulk Listings: Nagpur Bench handles high volumes; prioritize by case number.
- Virtual Hearings: Post-COVID, many on VC—confirm mode in cause list.
Example from Records: The cause-list should indicate if written submissions have been filed. (Salem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - 2005 5 Supreme 236) ensures transparency.
Nagpur's judicial legacy influences listings:
- Pre-Reorganisation: Nagpur High Court precedents bind Bombay HC Nagpur Bench under States Reorganisation Act. (Prabodh K. Mehta VS Charuben K. Mehta - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 1828)
- Contempt Cases: Forgery in orders leads to listings for punishment. (In Re VS Bineet Kumar Singh - 2001 4 Supreme 14)
Courts stress finality but correct errors ex debito justitiae. (A. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - 1988 Supreme(SC) 337)
In most cases, proactive monitoring ensures smooth litigation. For personalized guidance, approach local advocates familiar with Nagpur Bench practices.
Disclaimer: Legal outcomes vary by facts. This post draws from public records like Narinder Singh VS State of Punjab - 2014 2 Supreme 642, GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1, SHASHIKANT SHAMRAO BHOYAR vs BHUSHAN GOVIND RAMTEKE AND OTHERS, and others for illustration. Seek professional advice.
Word count approx. 1050. Published for informational purposes.
Quashing a proceeding becoming futile after compromise and compounding of offence - Two different things - By quashing a proceeding Court ... ... Finding of the Court: ... ... There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers ... The above list is illustrative and not exhaustive. ... In the very nature of its constitution, it is the judicial obligation of the High#HL_EN....
... High Court, in view of injuries to the complainant, refused to invoke ... is not required – Section 320(2) applies to serious offences and compounding requires permission of the court. ... Section 320 – Compounding of offences – Section 320(1) is applicable to minor offences – Permission of the court ... The above list is illustrative and not exhaustive. ... The trial court held that the accused persons, with common intention, went to the shop of the injured Abdul Rashid on that #H....
Whoever he may be, however high he is, he is under the law. ... speaking, we would be otherwise not constrained to express any opinion on this - Held, In the light of the above decisions of this Court ... Court by an interlocutory order restrained the investigation even at the initial stage, i. e. on the date when Rule Nisi was issued ... In the affidavit filed before the High Court, the S. ... The High Court went in detail of the motive alleged by C....
What might have been viewed in an earlier day as an improvident or even dangerous extension of state activities may today be deemed ... Irani against this order, but the appeal was dismissed by the High Court on 19th October, 1977. ... We accordingly dismiss the appeal and confirm the order of the High Court rejecting the writ petition.
(List II) in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. ... and the High Court. ... (List III) in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the executive power of the State is to be subject to, and limited by, the
Dilip Wamanrao Gund is concerned, he was an employee in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench. ... Dilip Wamanrao Gund (an employee in Bombay High Court, Nagpur) guilty of said forged order-Whether be accepted? ... High Court. ... Dilip Wamanrao Gund is concerned, he was an employee in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench. ... A fresh writ petition was filed in the Nagpur #HL_....
The learned Judges of the Court ordered notice to issue to the client and his two counsel to show cause why they should not all be ... Court and to the High Court and expressed their preparedness to purge the contempt for which they had been convicted. ... matter which rests in the discretion of the High Court except in very exceptional cases. ... . : This appeal by special leave arises out of contempt proceedings taken against two very senior members of the #HL_START....
existence on the date of enactment of the said States Reorganisation Act, 1956, the law laid down by the Nagpur High Court prior ... . - A question, being in conflict between judgment of Nagpur High Court and Bombay High Court liable to be referred to larger Bench ... After 1960 the territory of Nagpur continued to be part of State of Maharashtra since in this case neither the Nagpur Hig....
There is conflict of opinion in the Nagpur High Court on the question whether the charge created by the decree was a charge under ... High Court pointed out. ... Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - S. 100 - charge created by a decree -whether within the scope of section 100 - Conflict of views of Nagpur ... With the plaint, she filed Schedule 'b' containing the list of the joint family properties. ... In support of the dictum enunciated by the #HL_START....
(15) IT may also be mentioned that apart from the later Patna view, Nagpur ... High court in Champat Rao Mahadeo v. ... The view taken by Punjab and Haryana High court in Mohinder Singh v. Nanak Singh was overruled.
of Small Cause suit from 12-9-1979 and returning the plaint for presentation to the proper court on 18-4-1984. ... As the High Court held that the Small Causes Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, the suit came to be presented before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur and that too on 18-4-1984. ... This point was decided on merits by the Small Causes Court at Nagpur on 17-7-1983. It was held that the Small Causes Court#HL_....
If passing of a legislation gives rise to a cause of action, a writ petition questioning the constitutionality thereof can be filed in any High Court of the country. ... High Court and it would be valid in other areas. ... It is not shown to us that the operation of the judgement of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court in W.P.No.1096 of 2021 was stayed pending appeal before the Hon''ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Civil) No.19492 ....
20-01-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. ... 20-01-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. ... Respondent(s) (LIST THR. ... Respondent(s) (LIST THR. ... NEXT CAUSE LIST AS PER DIRECTIONS FROM MENTIONING BRANCH DATED 16.01.2023) (IA No. 4368/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date :
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR pointed out that the Cause List dated 18th September, 2018 did not show that application ... Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur, and produce a receipt Today, learned Advocate for the applicant has 1 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY be carried out within a period of 6 weeks from today. ... title be carried out within a period of 6 weeks from today. ... List this matter for further consideration on 30 1/2 IN THE HIGH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.