AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • No Evidence on Oath - The court highlighted that failure to provide agreed-upon evidence under oath can lead to case dismissal. An agreement to be bound by oath signifies a commitment to truthful testimony, and failure to comply undermines the evidentiary process. R. CHINNAPPA VS R. AROKIASWAMY - Karnataka

  • Authority to Receive Evidence on Oath - Officials such as Assistant Settlement Officers are empowered under the Oaths Act to receive evidence on oath, which is crucial for the validity and admissibility of evidence in proceedings. Abdullah Khan VS Emperor - Calcutta

  • Evidence on Oath in Legal Proceedings - Evidence given on oath, especially under special oath provisions, is considered conclusive proof in certain contexts. However, courts may still reject such evidence if not satisfied with its credibility, despite its oath-based affirmation. M. R. Ranganatha Aiyar VS Jayavelu Mudaliar - Madras

  • Presumption of Truth and Oath - Oral evidence under oath carries a presumption of truth; nonetheless, courts can reject such evidence if not convinced of its reliability. The weight of oath-bound testimony is subject to judicial scrutiny. Subadi & Seven others VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan

  • Right to Give Evidence on Oath - Accused persons have the right to testify on oath in their defense, which can be crucial for establishing their case. The law permits and encourages giving evidence on oath for fair trial proceedings. Shaitan Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan

  • Power to Investigate and Take Evidence on Oath - Authorities like the Official Assignee have the power to investigate claims and examine witnesses on oath, which is essential for the integrity of insolvency proceedings and creditor claims. Re : KHUSHLCHAND VS . - Bombay

  • Oral Evidence Before Commissioners on Oath - Oral evidence recorded under oath before court-appointed commissioners is permissible and carries evidentiary weight, provided it adheres to procedural rules. The legality of examination on oath is upheld in revision cases. Anil Chopra VS Ajay Kapoor - Punjab and Haryana

  • Presumption of Due Service and Rebuttal by Oath - The presumption that notices sent by registered post are duly served can be challenged by oath of the recipient, allowing for rebuttal and ensuring fairness in service procedures. Good Year India Limited VS Third Industrial Tribunal of West Bengal - Calcutta

  • Power of Enquiry Officers to Examine on Oath - Enquiry officers under statutory provisions possess powers akin to civil courts, including examining witnesses on oath, which is vital for fact-finding and avoiding baseless conclusions. K.S.S.Prasad vs The Deputy Registrar (Dairying) - Madras

  • Perjury and False Evidence on Oath - Giving false evidence on oath constitutes perjury, a serious offense. Courts are strict in dealing with such offenses, emphasizing the importance of truthful testimony under oath. State of Gujarat VS Amarsing Rupsing Mahida - Gujarat

Analysis and Conclusion:
Evidence given on oath is a cornerstone of legal proceedings, conferring presumed truthfulness and legal weight. Authorities are empowered to receive such evidence to uphold procedural integrity. However, courts retain the discretion to scrutinize and reject oath-based evidence if credibility is doubtful. The law also prescribes strict penalties for perjury and false testimony, underscoring the significance of honesty when testifying under oath. Overall, oath-bound evidence is fundamental but must be credible to influence judicial outcomes.

Search Results for "No Evidence on Oath"

R. CHINNAPPA VS R. AROKIASWAMY

1958 0 Supreme(Kar) 57 India - Karnataka

M.SADASIVAYYA

the agreed-upon evidence under oath. ... The court emphasized that the plaintiff's failure to provide the agreed-upon evidence under oath entitled the court to dismiss the ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the plaintiff's failure to provide the agreed-upon evidence under oath entitled ... Mutbiah Nadar, IT Mad LJ' 99 at p. 100 (F), the agreement to be bound by an oath of 'this kind, is in effect an agreement to treat the evidence given ....

Abdullah Khan VS Emperor

1909 0 Supreme(Cal) 59 India - Calcutta

RYVES, CHATTERJEE

on oath, which is authorized under the Oaths Act. 2) The Assistant Settlement Officer had the power to receive evidence on oath ... on oath under the Oaths Act. ... on oath under the Oaths Act. ... Receiving evidence is certainly within such power and, therefore, the Assistant Settlement Officer was authorised to receive evidence; and if he was authorised to receive evidence then comes the question whether, although authorised to receive ev....

M. R.  Ranganatha Aiyar VS Jayavelu Mudaliar

1940 0 Supreme(Mad) 42 India - Madras

KING

The respondent filed a suit under Rule 103, challenging the evidence given on oath. ... Oaths Act - Interpretation of Section 11 - Sections 8 and 9 - Evidence given on special oath - Conclusive proof - Proceedings ... The appellant applied for redelivery of the western half under Order 21, Rule 100, and gave evidence on special oath. ... And the question which I have now to decide is whether this section relates to the proceeding in which the evidence was given alone ....

Subadi & Seven others VS State of Rajasthan

2004 0 Supreme(Raj) 773 India - Rajasthan

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, KHEM CHAND SHARMA

Inspite of the presumption of truth attached to oral evidence under oath if the court is not satisfied, the evidence inspite of oath ... under oath if the Court is not satisfied, the evidence inspite of oath is of no avail – Acquitted. ... Cr.P.C., 1973, Sec. 242 – Evidence of prosecution – Evidence Act does not lay down any rule as to the weight to be attached to the ... Inspite of the presumption of truth attached to oral #HL_STAR....

Shaitan Singh VS State of Rajasthan

2005 0 Supreme(Raj) 288 India - Rajasthan

KHEM CHAND SHARMA

I fail to see why the Trial Court declined the prayer of the accused petitioner to give evidence on oath, only on the ground that ... (Para 3) ... An accused has a right to give evidence on oath in disproof ... In my view, if the petitioner is permitted to appear as a witness and give his evidence on oath as a witness in his defence would ... Section 315 Cr.P.C. entitles an accused to make an application for getting himself examined as a witness in his defence and to give evi....

Re : KHUSHLCHAND VS .

1965 0 Supreme(Bom) 131 India - Bombay

D.V.PATEL, B.D.BAL

Whether the Official Assignee has the power to investigate claims of creditors and take evidence on oath? 2. ... INSOLVENCY - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE'S POWER TO INVESTIGATE CLAIMS - ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE - INTERPRETATION ... on oath if necessary. ... Evidence before the Official Assignee consisted of the books of the insolvent and some oral evidence. The Official Assignee upheld the claim on the temple. ... Having regard to r. 25 and the duty imposed upon him to ....

Anil Chopra VS Ajay Kapoor

2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 692 India - Punjab and Haryana

M.M.S.BEDI

on oath by oral evidence before a Commissioner appointed under Order 26 Rule 4 CPC to record evidence as per Order 18 Rule 4 CPC ... on oath. ... on oath under the Order of the Court. ... oral evidence in examination-in-chief on oath. ... In the present revision petition, counsel for the petitioner has raised an interesting controversy regarding the permissibility of examination on oath by oral evidence before a Commissioner appoint....

Good Year India Limited VS Third Industrial Tribunal of West Bengal

1980 0 Supreme(Cal) 367 India - Calcutta

PADMA KHASTGIR

The Court further held that the presumption of due service of a notice sent by registered post is rebuttable by evidence on oath ... Whether the presumption of due service of a notice sent by registered post is rebuttable by evidence on oath of the addressee that ... The Court held that the presumption of due service of a notice sent by registered post is rebuttable by evidence on oath of the addressee ... Improper letting in evidence, improper rejection of ....

K.S.S.Prasad vs The Deputy Registrar (Dairying)

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47330 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

P.T. ASHA, J

“the officer, who is holding enquiry Section 87 of the Act shall have all the powers of a Civil Court while trying a Civil Suit unde rthe Code of Civil procedure and he has got power to enforce the attendance of any person and examine him on oath ... Without the evidences, either oral or documentary, if any adjudication is made it could surely be stated that it is out of surmise and such finding is perverse, which cannot be sustained.”

State of Gujarat VS Amarsing Rupsing Mahida

2008 0 Supreme(Guj) 506 India - Gujarat

J.R.VORA, M.R.SHAH

Code - Held, Court is satisfied that both respondents aforesaid two witnesses are guilty of offense of perjury i.e. giving false evidence ... application must be dealt with strictly - Respondents in revision application are held guilty for offences of perjury for giving false evidence ... on oath in criminal proceedings, and considering Section 344 of Code of Criminal Procedure, both of them are directed to undergo ... given by him on oath and he admits having committed the offense of giving false evidence#HL_E....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top