AI Overview

AI Overview...

#NPAIllegal, #SARFAESICases, #MSMENPARules

When is an NPA Declaration Deemed Illegal Due to Omission?


Non-Performing Asset (NPA) declarations by banks can significantly impact borrowers, triggering actions under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. But what happens when such a declaration is challenged as illegal due to omission? Courts have quashed NPAs in cases of procedural lapses, such as failure to follow MSME guidelines or RBI norms. This post explores common omissions leading to NPA declared illegal, drawing from landmark judgments.


Disclaimer: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation, as outcomes vary by facts.


Understanding NPA and Grounds for Illegality


An NPA is an account where principal or interest remains overdue for 90 days, per RBI guidelines. Banks classify accounts as NPAs to enforce recovery under SARFAESI. However, declarations can be illegal if banks omit mandatory steps.


Key Omissions Leading to Illegal NPA



Courts emphasize strict adherence: The classification of the accounts of the first and the second petitioners is clearly illegal. South Indian Bank vs PDMC Industries - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 3070


Case Studies: NPA Declarations Overturned


MSME Non-Compliance Cases


MSMEs enjoy protections under MSMED Act. Banks must notify Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation before NPA.



Takeaway: Borrowers must prove MSME status timely, but banks bear procedural burden. Late assertion may not save, but proven omission voids NPA. Dooars Jute Textiles Private Limited vs State Bank of India - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 475


SARFAESI Procedural Lapses


Under SARFAESI, omissions like no borrower notice or improper possession lead to quashing.



Guarantors face co-extensive liability, but banks can't omit notices to them. Liability of the guarantor and principal debtor is coextensive... Creditor has the right to proceed against either. United Bank of India VS Satyawati Tondon - 2010 Supreme(SC) 621


RBI Guidelines as Internal Instructions


RBI norms are executive; no statutory right unless strictly followed.



Exhausting Remedies Before Challenging NPA


Courts rarely entertain writs without exhausting DRT/DRAT under SARFAESI Section 17.



Steps for Borrowers:
1. Respond to Section 13(2) notice within 60 days.
2. Appeal to DRT under Section 17.
3. Approach DRAT if needed.
4. Writ only if gross illegality or no remedy.


Impact on Guarantors and Third Parties


Guarantors' properties can be proceeded against directly: The Bank could have issued notices to the surety/guarantor... without first giving notice to the borrower. United Bank of India VS Satyawati Tondon - 2010 Supreme(SC) 621


But if principal NPA is illegal due to omission, guarantor actions fall too. Sales violating SARFAESI Rules 8/9 are null and void: Any sale in violation of section 13, SARFAESI Act... would be null and void. J. Rajiv Subramaniyan VS Pandiyas - 2014 2 Supreme 601


Recent Trends: COVID and Restructuring


Pandemic-era defaults saw leniency pleas, but courts uphold if procedures followed.



Key Takeaways for Borrowers and Banks



  • For Borrowers: Challenge via DRT first. Prove MSME status early; document communications.

  • For Banks: Follow RBI/MSME steps meticulously. Issue notices; classify SMA before NPA.

  • Common Pitfall: Omission of natural justice or guidelines = NPA declared illegal.


| Omission Type | Legal Consequence | Remedy |
|---------------|------------------|--------|
| MSME non-classification | NPA quashed South Indian Bank vs PDMC Industries - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 3070 | DRT appeal |
| No Section 13(2) notice | Actions void RITA BAGGA VS UNION OF INDIA - 2015 Supreme(All) 476 | Section 17 |
| RBI guideline ignore | No borrower right Oriental Bank of Commerce VS Sunder Lal Jain - 2008 1 Supreme 172 | Compliance check |


In summary, while NPAs protect lenders, omissions like procedural skips make declarations vulnerable. Cases show courts prioritize compliance. Stay informed, act swiftly.


Word count approx. 1050. Sources integrated from judgments for accuracy.

Search Results for "NPA Declared Illegal: Common Omissions Explained"

United Bank of India VS Satyawati Tondon - 2010 Supreme(SC) 621

2010 0 Supreme(SC) 621 India - Supreme Court

G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY

After another one year, the account of respondent No.2 was classified as Non-Performing Asset. ... After another one year, the account of respondent No.2 was classified as Non-Performing Asset. ... debt and his account in respect of such debt is classified as non- performing asset, then the secured creditor may require the borrower ... She pleaded that the notices issued by the appellant for recovery of the outstanding dues are ex f....

Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev VS State of Maharashtra - 2011 1 Supreme 655

2011 1 Supreme 655 India - Supreme Court

D.K.JAIN, H.L.DATTU

The appellants filed a writ petition contending that the notice issued by respondent No. 3 was illegal, no action could be taken ... On default of re-payment of loan amount, respondent No. 3 issued a notice under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial ... of secured debt, and his account in respect of such debt is classified as non- performing asset, then the secured creditor may require ... No.286 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court, inter-alia, contending that the notice issued by respond....

United Bank of India VS Satyawati Tondon - 2010 Supreme(SC) 615

2010 0 Supreme(SC) 615 India - Supreme Court

G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY

After another one year, the account of respondent No.2 was classified as Non- Performing Asset. ... She pleaded that the notices issued by the appellant for recovery of the outstanding dues are ex facie illegal and liable to be quashed ... After another one year, the account of respondent No.2 was classified as Non- Performing Asset. ... debt and his account in respect of such debt is classified as non- performing asset#HL....

Shankara Co-op Housing Society Ltd.  VS M.  Prabhakar - 2011 3 Supreme 569

2011 3 Supreme 569 India - Supreme Court

H.L.DATTU, D.K.JAIN

Commissioner can only revise the orders passed by the officers specified in the Section itself if the order so passed is either illegal ... Custodian in later entries – Without any further record or evidence High Court finding the notification u/s 7 of Evacuee Property Act illegal ... or improper – Revision of the orders under the provisions of the Evacuee Property Act without jurisdiction and non-est in law. ... The Bank declared their account as Non Performing Asset....

Swiss Ribbons Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Union of India - 2019 2 Supreme 524

2019 2 Supreme 524 India - Supreme Court

ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA

– Wilful defaulter and Non Performing Asset (NPA) – Distinction – A wilful defaulter would be a person who though able to pay, does ... not pay – An NPA, on the other hand, refers to the account belonging to a person that is declared as such under RBI guidelines – ... becomes defaulter when an instalment and/or interest on the principal remains overdue for more than three months – Such account is declared ... They referred to the RBI Regulations dealing with #HL_START....

RAJAN. M.A. Versus THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6393

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6393 India - High Court of Kerala

N. NAGARESH, J

NPA - Loan Default - The court upheld the NPA declaration and enforcement of security interest by the bank due to the petitioner's ... The bank declared the loan account as NPA, invoked the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ... Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's challenge against the NPA declaration and enforcement of security interest by ... The respondents thereupon #HL_STA....

South Indian Bank vs PDMC Industries - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 3070

2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 3070 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, P.M.MANOJ

classification illegal. ... NPA declaration, which must comply with specific guidelines. ... to comply with MSME-related notifications before classifying accounts as NPAs is unlawful. ... The declaration of the unit as NPA and all the steps taken in pursuance of the said declaration are improper and illegal, and the ... As such, the classification of the accounts of the first and the second petitioners is clearly illegal#H....

Amit Kumar Kolay vs Bank of India - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1121

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1121 India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Naresh Salecha, M (Technical)

that due to continuous defaults and failure to adhere to the repayment schedule, including interest payments, the Corporate Debtor ... declaration - It was found that default occurred as interest payments were due without moratorium; thus, debts were confirmed and ... valid default claims. ... The alleged NPA on 30.09.2019 was incorrect and illegal since the repayment was to commence only in December 2019. ... on 3....

PDMC Industries, Through Its Managing Partner Bobby Isaac Mathew vs Ministry of Micro Small And Medium Enterprises, Represented By Its Secretary - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 2122

2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2122 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.,

Assets - The Bank failed to classify MSME accounts accurately as per RBI norms, leading to an unlawful NPA declaration. ... (Paras 2, 10) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The classification of accounts as NPAs was illegal ... (Paras 3, 21, 29) ... ... (B) Principles of Natural Justice - The failure to ... As such, the classification of the accounts of the first and the second petitioners is clearly illegal and liable to....

Harinder Fabrics VS Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.  - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2741

2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 2741 India - Punjab and Haryana

G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

to pandemic, loan account declared NPA - Respondent issued possession notice demanding full repayment - No valid representations ... -19, resulting in NPA declaration and possession notice issued for ₹75,02,583/- owed. ... (A) Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13(2), Section ... The petitioner could not pay regular installments due to Covid 19 as such the account of the petitioner-firm was #H....

PREAMAVATHY (DR. ) VS STATE BANK OF INDIA

India - Consumer

R.C.JAIN, S.K.NAIK

The omission to show that the account was declared as NPA on 1.4.2003 in the copy of the statement of accounts is not a material factor to be considered and this omission will not prove it to be otherwise as though it is not an NPA account. ... The further contention of the respondent/complainant is that it is not shown in the statement of accounts that the loan account was declared as NPA on 1.4.2003. ... His precise contention is that before an account can be #HL_ST....

DR. PREAMAVATHY vs STATE BANK OF INDIA

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

The omission to show that the account was declared as NPA on 1-4-2003 in the copy of the statement of accounts is not a material factor to be considered and this omission will not prove it to be otherwise as though it is not an NPA account. ... The further contention of the respondent / complainant is that it is not shown in the statement of accounts that the loan account was declared as NPA on 1-4-2003. ... His precise contention is that before an account can be #HL_....

M/S JAULE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD AND ORS vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND ORS

India - Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

HON'BLE Mr. Justice P.K.Bhasin

was wrongly declared as NPA. ... even led any evidence to show that it had lawfully declared the appellants9 account NPA. ... It was not disputed before this Tribunal from either side that if the very declaration if appellants9 account as NPA is found to be illegal, subsequent measures initiated under SARFAESI Act by respondent Bank will also be illegal ... as NPA. ... the Account as NPA.

Gouri Shankar Chatterjee VS State Bank Of India & Anr. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1174

2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1174 India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Kumar (Member(Judicial)) , Hon'ble Dr. Alok Srivastava (Member (Technical)) ,

The State Bank of India declared the loan account of the corporate debtor as NPA on 6.8.2012 and quite clearly the declaration of NPA has not been declared as illegal or incorrect. Therefore, the limitation for section 7 application starts from 6.8.2012. ... We note that the NPA of the corporate debtor loan account was declared on 6.8.2012. ... and the declaration of account of the corporate debtor’s account as NPA was also alleged to be i....

M/S. ASHOK BRICKS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD vs NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD

India - Orissa

NPA. ... Said opposite party no.2 wrongfully declared his client9s account be a nonperforming asset (NPA). ... March, 2022, to demonstrate that the reason for guarantees have not been made by opposite party no.2, presumably because his client9s account has declared

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top