AI Overview...
-
Parmeshwar Subrat - Multiple references indicate involvement in land and property disputes, family inheritance, and legal proceedings related to ancestral property and joint family claims. Specifically, Parmeshwar's name appears in consolidation records, family property disputes, and genealogy objections, suggesting he is a significant figure in these cases Hari Ram VS Jamuna - Allahabad, Dular Chand Sah VS Devnath Sah - Patna, Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad.
-
Family Property and Inheritance - Parmeshwar is documented as an heir to ancestral land, with claims of equal inheritance alongside other family branches such as Mahavir. His name was directed to be recorded in consolidation proceedings, and objections have been raised regarding his and others' rights over the property Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad.
-
Family Disputes and Legal Proceedings - Parmeshwar has been involved in legal objections and disputes concerning family genealogy, property sharing, and land records. Courts have examined claims related to joint family status, property rights, and mutation of land records, with some judgments favoring or recognizing his claims Hari Ram VS Jamuna - Allahabad, Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad, JUGESHWAR SINGH VS BALDEO SINGH - Patna.
-
Specific Cases and Judgments - Several judgments mention Parmeshwar in the context of land disputes, including cases where his name was directed to be recorded or objections were filed against his property rights. The legal proceedings reflect ongoing disputes over ancestral land and family rights Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad, JUGESHWAR SINGH VS BALDEO SINGH - Patna.
-
Broader Legal Context - The references also include rulings on related legal principles such as joint family rights, genealogy objections, and land record corrections, which are pertinent to Parmeshwar's disputes. These cases highlight the complexities of inheritance and property rights within joint families under Indian law Hari Ram VS Jamuna - Allahabad, Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Parmeshwar Subrat appears as a key figure involved in land inheritance, family disputes, and legal proceedings related to ancestral property. His claims of joint family membership and inheritance rights are recognized in some records, while others involve objections or legal challenges to his rights. The cases reflect typical issues in family and property law concerning joint family property, genealogy, and land record corrections. Overall, Parmeshwar's role is that of a claimant and participant in ongoing legal disputes over land and family inheritance Hari Ram VS Jamuna - Allahabad, Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad, Dular Chand Sah VS Devnath Sah - Patna, JUGESHWAR SINGH VS BALDEO SINGH - Patna.
References:
- Hari Ram VS Jamuna - Allahabad
- Dular Chand Sah VS Devnath Sah - Patna
- Kallu VS D. D. C. District Lucknow - Allahabad
- JUGESHWAR SINGH VS BALDEO SINGH - Patna
Search Results for "Parmeshwar Subrat"
2014 0 Supreme(All) 2013 • India - Allahabad
RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
In basic consolidation records, the names of Yadunath son of Triveni, Kashi and Parmeshwar sons of Kundan, Parsuram son of Jamuna, Gyandas and Bhagwandas sons of Gannu were recorded over khata 130, the names of Yadunath son of Triveni, Kashi, Parmeshwar and Jamuna sons of Kundan were recorded over khatas ... Jamuna son of Kundan and Ghanshyam son of Pareshwar (respondents-1 and 2) filed an objection on the ground that Yadunath did not execute any will and died as a member of joint Hindu family as such after his death his share was jointly....
2015 0 Supreme(Pat) 1065 • India - Patna
SHIVAJI PANDEY
Parmeshwar Sah walked out from the family after taking his share. ... It has been claimed that Parmeshwar Sah has remained joint with his two brothers, namely, Ram Sharik Sah and Nanhku Sah, property purchases by the family in the year 1957 was also funded by Parmeshwar Sah. ... Defendant Ist party appeared and filed their written statement raising objection with regard to genealogy and claimed that predecessor in interest, namely, branch of Parmeshwar Sah is also entitled to the share in property described in Schedule “....
2014 0 Supreme(All) 2910 • India - Allahabad
RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
The land in dispute was the ancestral property as such branches of Parmeshwar as well as Mahavir, both have inherited the property in equal proportion. The name of Parmeshwar was directed to be recorded in the earlier consolidation proceeding and finding contrary to it is illegal. ... Parmeshwar has filed an objection under Section 9 of the Act for deleting the names of Ram Dulare and Kallu Prasad from the land in dispute. ... The Settlement Officer Consolidation by order dated 30.8.2013 found that the land in dispute was exclusively reco....
2016 0 Supreme(All) 3648 • India - Allahabad
RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
JUDGMENT ... Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. ... 1. Heard Sri Jagdamba Prasad Yadav, for the petitioners in both the writ petitions and Standing Counsel for the respondents. ... Writ B No. 45209 of 2016 has been filed against the orders of Chief Revenue Officer dated 09.04.2013, deleting the names of Harideen, Paremeshwar Prasad, Mani Ram, Gaya Prasad, Rakesh, and Rajesh Kumar, from plot 287 (area 0.304 hectare) of village Bharsada, pargana Barausa, district Sultanpur and Board ... Sub-Divisional Officer, by order dated 29.03.1992, passed in Case No. 8, under Se....
2015 0 Supreme(All) 2503 • India - Allahabad
RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
JUDGMENT ... Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J. ... 1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Rai, for the petitioner, in review application. ... 2.
2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 1175 • India - High Court of Gujarat
S.V. PINTO, J
1] This application is filed by the applicant for suspension of sentence in connection with the conviction recorded vide judgment and order dated 25/07/2023 by the learned Special Judge, (POCSO) & 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Special (POCSO) Case No. 264 of 2021 whereby ... Learned advocate submits that the applicant was on bail during trial and the sentence is for a fixed period and the applicant has a good case on merits and hence the execution of order of sentence imposed on 25/07/2023 by the learned Special Judge, (POCSO) & 4th Additional Sessions Judge, #HL....
1988 0 Supreme(Pat) 44 • India - Patna
S.B.SINHA
Ram Surat Devi V/s. Smt. Satraji Kuer, AIR 1975 Pat 168. There is no dispute so far as the proposition of law enumerated in the aforesaid decisions is concerned.
1970 0 Supreme(Pat) 10 • India - Patna
K.ABRAHAM
The learned Sub-divisional Officer had also accepted the contention of the opposite party that plot no. 1737 was recorded in survey in the name of Parmeshwar Mahton and others. ... The revision petition has been filed only by Jugeshwar Singh and not by Ram Surat Singh, son of Ramjanam Singh the original applicant, who had died during the pendency of the case and in whose place Ram Surat Singh was substituted.
• India - Consumer
V.B.GUPTA, SURESH CHANDRA
Kartick Das, (1994) 4 SCC 225 and Ganapathi Parmeshwar Kashi & Anr. Vs. Bank of India & Anr. [Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.5401 of 2013] and the judgment of this Commission by a 5-Member Bench in the case of Unit Trust of India Vs. ... Taking into consideration the judgment given by Gujarat Consumer Commission in Case Appeal No.282/2009 Dipak Kumar Nanubhai Desai v/s Religare Securities Limited, Surat, the Commission rejected the appeal and accepted the disclosure presented by Religare Securities Limited.
2004 0 Supreme(Guj) 205 • India - Gujarat
M.S.SHAH, A.M.KAPADIA
... ( 2 ) WHAT is challenged in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is the order-in-appeal No. 68 dated 23. 10. 2002 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and Customs, Surat arising from the order-in-original
Filter by Legal Phrase
