AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Generally, a formal partition deed that records the division of land among co-owners is compulsorily registrable under Section 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. Failure to register such a deed renders it inadmissible as evidence and may invalidate claims based on it. However, documents that are merely memoranda or informal arrangements, such as family settlements or non-formalized agreements, may not require registration. Courts consistently emphasize that the registration of partition deeds is crucial for their evidentiary value and legal enforceability.

Search Results for "Partition Deed Required Registration or Not"

Joginder Singh VS Mohinder Singh

1996 0 Supreme(P&H) 1590 India - Punjab and Haryana

N.K.KAPOOR

RECITING LAND, CAMEL AND ORNAMENTS FALLING TO THE SHARE OF A COPARCENER - NOT A PARTITION DEED - REGISTRATION NOT REQUIRED. ... deed, and thus did not require registration. ... The trial court held the deed to be a memorandum of partition and not a partition deed, and thus not requiring registration....

Govindan and Others VS District Registrar, Tenkasi and Another

2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 1487 India - Madras

M.E.N.PATRUDU

of deed of partition is required not between members of family but joint purchasers of lands - District Registrar has to decide ... Stamp Act (2 of 1899), Section 47-A(1), Schedule I Article 45-A, No. 16 - Tamil Nadu Registration Manual, Standing Order 744 - Registration ... It is further stated that partition deed was presented for registration on 17.8.2005. ... In the instant case, the petitioners opted for registration....

S.D.RAVEENDRA PRASAD, Vs  STATE OF KERALA,

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9809 India - High Court of Kerala

Devan Ramachandran, J

Finding of the Court: The court recognized that the Partition Deed was not fully registered as required, and noted ... the delayed registration of their Partition Deed. ... Registration - Partition Deed - Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 24, 25 - The court emphasized the necessity of following registration ... Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED PARTITION#HL_....

CHAND SINGH ALIAS HARCHAND SINGH vs BASANT KAUR ETC.

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8678 India - High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Issues: Whether the partition deed required compulsory registration under Section 17 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. ... PARTITION - REGISTRATION - COMPULSORY REGISTRATION - SECTION 17 OF THE INDIAN REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 - PARTITION DEED - CONNECTION ... REQUIRED. ... It is a writing, which merely states that there has in time past has been a partition,....

KANKU VS KALIA RAM

2012 0 Supreme(HP) 795 India - Himachal Pradesh

RAJIV SHARMA

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the failure to register the partition deed as required by the Registration ... The court found that the partition deed was not registered as required by Section 17(1)(b) and that the plaintiffs failed to prove ... P-1) was not registered as required by the Registration Act, 1908, and that the plaintiffs failed to prove adverse possession. ... Iqr....

Pilla Muniyappa VS H.  Anjanappa

2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 1052 India - Karnataka

ANAND BYRAREDDY

deed and is required to be compulsorily registered. ... INDIAN REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 - Sections 17(1)(b) & 49: [Ananda Byrareddy, J] Document compulsorily registrable - Partition deed ... It was inadmissible in evidence for want of registration and could not have been relied upon as the basis to claim that there was ... This case does not again help the appellant to sustain the proposition put forth that the deed of parti....

NITYA RANJAN CHATTERJEE VS CHITTA RANJAN CHATTERJEE

1990 0 Supreme(Cal) 118 India - Calcutta

PABITRA KUMAR BANERJEE, G.N.RAY

Therefore, the award was not required to be registered under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. ... Therefore, the award was not required to be registered under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. Issues: 1. ... parties and directed them to get a proper deed of partition registered. ... document and it was, therefore, held that such document was not required for registration under the....

Harpal Singh VS Mohinder Singh

2002 0 Supreme(P&H) 137 India - Punjab and Haryana

V.K.BALI

settlement, and therefore required registration. ... deed requiring registration. ... deed, highlighting the need for registration in the latter case. ... require any registration. ... ... First of all this document is not proved to be a family settlement. Secondly this document is not a memorandum of partition at most this document is partition deed by which t....

L. Rs.  of Pandurang Dharmadhikari VS Kusumtai @ Malini W/o Vasantrao Bhagwat

2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1543 India - Bombay

Z.A.HAQ

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the document was a partition deed and required registration under Section 17(1)(b) of ... Issues: The issues revolved around the admissibility of the partition deed dated 13th May, 1992, and whether it required registration ... 13th May, 1992, concluding it was a partition deed and inadmissible in evidence due to non-registration. ... The learned senior advoc....

Heera Chand VS LRs.  of Late Shri Prem Chand

1995 0 Supreme(Raj) 940 India - Rajasthan

R.R.YADAV

The partition deed dated 10.1.1955 was not admissible in evidence as it required registration. 2. ... DEED - NOT RECEIVABLE IN EVIDENCE - SUIT FOR POSSESSION - DISMISSED. ... Whether the partition deed dated 10.1.1955 was admissible in evidence. 2. ... They also alleged that the so-called partition deed dated 10.1.55 is not receivable in evidence as it requires ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top