AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Partition Not Necessary for Remedy under Sections 251 and 251-A of Rajasthan Tenancy Act - The courts have clarified that partition of land is not a prerequisite for granting remedies related to easementary rights or opening new ways for tenants. An order can be issued after a summary inquiry if it is absolutely necessary, without requiring partition of the land. The focus is on the necessity of the relief rather than partitioning the land itself Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Current Civil Cases, Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Rajasthan.

  • Easementary Rights and Opening of New Ways - Under Sections 207 and 251-A of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, if a person claims a right of way based on easement, courts may direct the opening of a new way after a summary inquiry, provided it is absolutely necessary. The proceedings emphasize that such relief is granted based on necessity, not on partition or division of land Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Rajasthan.

  • Partition and Tenancy Rights - The case law indicates that even if land is partitioned, it does not automatically entitle or restrict tenants’ rights, especially concerning easements or ways. The courts have held that the termination of tenancy or rights cannot be solely dependent on partition, and remedies can be granted without partitioning land Rani Sundarammani VS Govt. of A. P. , Revenue Department - Andhra Pradesh.

  • Legislative Context and Judicial Approach - The Rajasthan Tenancy Act and amendments (like the 1956 amendments to Bombay Tenancy Act) are within legislative competence, and their provisions regarding easements and rights are to be enforced without necessarily requiring partition. The courts focus on the necessity and fairness of the remedy rather than on partitioning land RAM RAM NARAIN MEDHI VS State Of Bombay - Supreme Court, Ram Ram Narain Medhi VS State Of Bombay - Supreme Court.

  • Legal Procedure and Remedies - Orders under Civil Procedure Code and specific relief laws facilitate quick relief where necessary, emphasizing that partition is not a mandatory condition for granting relief related to easements or rights of way. The courts prioritize the necessity of the remedy over procedural complexities like partition Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Current Civil Cases, Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Rajasthan.

Analysis and Conclusion:
The main insight from the sources is that under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, particularly Sections 207 and 251-A, the remedy for establishing easementary rights or opening new pathways does not require partition of land. Courts have consistently held that such relief can be granted on the basis of necessity after a summary inquiry, without resorting to partition. This approach aligns with judicial principles emphasizing fairness and practicality over procedural formalities, ensuring tenants’ rights are protected without unnecessary division of land Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Current Civil Cases, Hema Ram VS Ram Singh - Rajasthan, Rani Sundarammani VS Govt. of A. P. , Revenue Department - Andhra Pradesh.

References:
- Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order XXXIX, Rule 1
- Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 — Sections 207 & 251-A
- Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (Amendments)
- Land Reforms Acts and relevant case law on easements and partition

Search Results for "Partition Not Necessary for the Remedy of 251 a Rajasthan Tenency Act"

Hema Ram VS Ram Singh

India - Current Civil Cases

SANGEET LODHA

(i) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order XXXIX, Rule 1 — Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 — Section 207 & 251-A — Tenant or group of tenants ... Tenancy Act, 1955 — Section 207 & 251-A — Easementary Right — Person claiming right to way on basis of easement — Must prima facie ... order directing opening of new way from holdings of khatedar tenant on being satisfied after summary inquiry — That it absolutely necessary ... it is absolutely necessary#....

Hema Ram VS Ram Singh

2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 668 India - Rajasthan

SANGEET LODHA

Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 – Section 207, 251 and 351 – Easementary right – Agriculture field – Cogent ... directing opening of new way so from holdings of a khatedar tenant on being satisfied after summary inquiry that it is absolutely necessary ... terms that pending disposal of suit defendants may be restrained from obotructing existing way available to petitioner and may not ... that it is absolutely necessary and it is not for mere convenient e....

Rani Sundarammani VS Govt. of A. P. , Revenue Department

2006 0 Supreme(AP) 612 India - Andhra Pradesh

RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act – Sections 9, 4, 68, 1 – A. P. ... and documentary, and are matters eminently suited for adjudication in a suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction and not ... Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 – Section 8(1) – Entry of Land in Prohibitory records – Challenged – Action ... In State of Rajasthan V. ... Secondly, assuming that the partition was valid, the respondent had no right to terminate the tenancy#HL_....

RAM RAM NARAIN MEDHI VS State Of Bombay

1958 0 Supreme(SC) 154 India - Supreme Court

B.P.SINHA, K.N.WANCHOO, K.SUBBA RAO, N.H.BHAGWATI, S.R.DASS

It was an Act further to amend the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (Bom. ... The impugned Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956 (Bom. ... The impugned Act is within the legislative competence of the State Legislature and is not a piece of colourable legislation. ... State of Rajasthan (4) ). ... If the rule-making authority abuses its power or makes any attempt to make the payment illusory the expropriated propri....

Ram Ram Narain Medhi VS State Of Bombay

1953 0 Supreme(SC) 109 India - Supreme Court

S.R.DASS, N.H.BHAGWATI, B.P.SINHA, K.SUBBA RAO, K.N.WANCHOO

The impugned Act, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956 (Bom. ... Fact of the Case: The impugned Act, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956 (Bom. ... S. 7 of the impugned Act is not bad by reason of excessive delegation of legislative power. ... State of Rajasthan, 1955-2 S C R 303 at p. 329 : ... 14. ... If the rule-making authority abuses its power or wakes any attempt to make the pay....

Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan VS Sriniwas son of late Shri Ramchandra

2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 153 India - Rajasthan

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Order 19 Rule 2 - Specific Relief Act – Section 34 Indian Trust Act, 1882 – ... Section 3,19 and 20 - Indian Evidence Act – Section 41 and 43 - Hindu Succession Act 1956 – Section 8 – Property – Rent - Recover ... proved in favour of said was not become the sole owner of property at the time of execution of the sale-deeds, rent receipts were ... , and so far as is necessary to give, effect to the transfer, the transferor's right to joint possession or other ....

Tarawati vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue

2025 0 Supreme(All) 3367 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

SAURABH LAVANIA

(Paras 24, 24.6, 25) ... ... (B) Non-joinder of necessary parties in proceedings - Court emphasizes ... Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1952 - Sections 8, 9, 14, 15, and Rules 8, 9, 10, and 11 - Land disputes and grant of land - Petitioners challenge ... Consolidation authorities regarding land recorded in the name of one Gulab Chand as 'Sirdar' - Court finds entries in revenue records not ... the matter and therefore on that ground it is not necessary for us to dilate any more. ... According to the part....

Samatha: Hyderabad Abrasives And Minerals Private LTD.  VS State Of A. P.

1997 6 Supreme 530 India - Supreme Court

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY, S.SAGHIR AHMAD

to law and declared such transfer as void except by way of testamentary disposition by a tribal to his kith and kin/tribal or by partition ... Section 3 of EP Act enjoins the Central Government that it should take such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose ... It is needless to mention that necessary sanction for exemption of said amount form income-tax liability, may be obtained; and the ... a member of a Scheduled Tribe; but does not include a partition or a dev....

Krishna Kumar Ratwat VS Union of India

2007 0 Supreme(Raj) 850 India - Rajasthan

S.N.JHA, MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

Income Tax Act, 1961, Sec. 269-UC, Chapter XX-C – Pre-emption purchase order of property under chapter XX-C of the Act – Validity ... decision making process (v) decision is such that no reasonable person could on available material arrive at – The matter does not ... It was argued that the valuation on the basis of the rates notified by the Government for the purpose of registration of conveyance deeds under the Rajasthan Stamp Act was not relevant for deciding the controversy in ques....

Shivamma (Dead) by LRs.  VS Karnataka Housing Board

2025 7 Supreme 644 India - Supreme Court

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN

do not resort to dilatory tactics, but seek their remedy promptly – Object of providing a legal remedy is to repair damage caused ... period for launching remedy may lead to unending uncertainty and consequential anarchy – Idea is that every legal remedy must be ... by reason of legal injury – Law of limitation fixes a lifespan for such legal remedy for redress of legal injury so suffered – Unending ... At this juncture, it would be apposite to refer to the decision of this Court in St....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top