AI Overview...
-
Interest Payment under MSME Act - The MSME Development Act, 2006, mandates the payment of interest for delayed payments to MSMEs, considering it a mandatory statutory obligation to prevent the suffocation of small businesses and ensure timely settlement of dues. The Act emphasizes that interest should be paid at prescribed rates when payments are delayed, reflecting its mandatory nature M/S KISHNA EXPORTS INTERNATIONAL Vs CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL - Rajasthan.
-
Legal Precedents and Statutory Provisions - Courts have consistently held that statutory interest under Sections 16 and 18 of the MSME Act is overriding and cannot be waived by contractual clauses. Non-compliance with these provisions disqualifies claimants from claiming interest, highlighting the mandatory character of interest payments under the Act BALAJEE STRUCTURAL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED vs TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal.
-
Scope and Applicability - The Act's provisions for interest are applicable when the debtor fails to make payments within stipulated timeframes. However, in cases where the initial approval or payment claims are invalid or lack proper authority, the entitlement to interest under the MSME Act may not arise. Additionally, the benefit of MSME registration is available to enterprises, not individual partners, and registration is not strictly mandatory but beneficial for enforcement N. P. Abdul Nazer, S/o. Late Mr. Mohammed Kutty VS Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank), Malappuram Branch, Represented by it's Authorised Officer, Ashok Kumar - Kerala.
-
Related Legal Frameworks - The MSME Act's provisions on interest are reinforced by other statutes like the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which interact with MSME interests in recovery and dispute resolution. Courts have upheld the precedence of recovery under SARFAESI over MSME provisions, but the statutory interest under MSME Act remains a key safeguard for MSMEs against delayed payments M/s.Jain Steels Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.Pankaj Jain vs M/s.Larsen & Toubro Ltd, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr.K.Manikandan - Madras, M/S METRO STEEL SECTION vs THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER - Karnataka.
-
Overall Conclusion - Payment of interest under the MSME Act is a mandatory requirement when payments are delayed beyond the stipulated period. Courts recognize this interest as a statutory right aimed at protecting MSMEs, and non-compliance with these provisions can disqualify claims for interest. The law emphasizes timely payments, with interest serving as a deterrent against delayed dues and as a protection for small-scale industries M/S KISHNA EXPORTS INTERNATIONAL Vs CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL - Rajasthan, BALAJEE STRUCTURAL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED vs TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal.
References: - MSME Development Act, 2006, Sections 16, 18, and 19 - Supreme Court and NCLT judgments on MSME interest provisions - Related statutes: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, SARFAESI Act
Search Results for "Payment of Interest under Msme Act Mandatory"
2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 10244 • India - High Court Of Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
MSME - Delay in Payment - Interest - Mandatory Provision Fact of the Case: that MSME’s cannot be suffocated/ derailed in their businesses by non-payment of amounts due for goods supplied/ service rendered within time and payment of interest is specifically provided for at ratescan be construed mandatory or as merely directory, taken in the context of the Act of 2006, the object and purpose of the Act#HL_E....
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 92 • India - National Company Law Tribunal
K. R. SAJI KUMAR, SANJIV DUTT, JJ
The Operational Creditor claimed its status as an MSME entitled to compound interest, while the Corporate Debtor refuted these claims ... ... ... Facts of the case: ... The Operational Creditor filed for CIRP against the Corporate Debtor for an alleged outstanding payment ... to meet threshold limit - Application for CIRP rejected due to lack of maintainability and evidence of pre-existing dispute - No interest ... However, neither the invoices nor the Agreement provides for payment of any ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 56849 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, JJ
(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - MSMED Development Act, 2006 - Section 18 - Petitioner claimed payment from ... ... ... Issues: The key issues included the jurisdiction for awards under the MSME Act, compliance with pre-deposit rules, and the ... Act—highlighting that awards without justification could not stand. ... The deficit in payment been raised by the appellant and relying on the expression used in Section 19 of the MSME#HL_....
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4770 • India - National Company Law Tribunal
SHRI. JYOTI KUMAR TRIPATHI, SHRI. RAVICHANDRAN RAMASAMY, JJ
Section 18 of the MSME Act have not been complied with, thereby disqualifying the applicant from claiming interest under that statute. 7.3. ... It was contended that statutory interest under Section 16 of the MSMED Act is overriding in nature and cannot be waived or negated by contractually agreed clauses. The Applicant emphasized that non-payment within the stipulated time under a href="./..
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2253 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Initial approval for payment lacked authority, leading to a claim for interest based on the MSME Act, which was not applicable. ... (A) MSME Act, 2006 - Sections 2(b), 15, 16 - Review petition regarding payment claims - The learned Single Judge erred by awarding ... Payments claimed by writ petitioners were not valid due to non-application of the MSME Act. ... In this context, the MSMED Act, 2006....
• India - Delhi High Court
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Section 19 of the MSME Act and comparing it with the provision of law in predecessor statute, Interest on Delayed Payments Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 (`Interest on Delayed Payments Act', for short), dealing with release of pre-deposit to an MSME, ... He vehemently submitted that the Interest on Delayed Payments Act was the predecessor statute to ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9136 • India - Karnataka High Court
(A) Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Articles 226 and 227 of ... (MSME) - Court finds that the petitioner, a partnership firm, had become a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) due to irregular repayments ... MSME restructuring - The court held that the provisions for revival and rehabilitation apply only to functioning units, and since ... payment not overdue for more than 30 days but account showing signs of incipient stressSMA-1Principal or ....
2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10865 • India - High Court of Kerala
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
Issues: Is the challenge against the order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act maintainable, and can the MSME Act provisions ... the SARFAESI Act, emphasizing the absence of alternative remedies and the supremacy of SARFAESI over the MSME provisions. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the SARFAESI Act's provisions prevail over the MSME Act concerning recovery actions, ... payment not overdue for more than 30 days but account showing sign....
2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 546 • India - Kerala
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Article 320 of Constitution held that word ‘shall’ appearing in that provision was not mandatory. ... Panakkad Agencies, each individual partner cannot seek benefit of the MSME Act separately. ... However, it is appropriate to mention that benefit of MSME registration is available to enterprise and not to individual. ... is only a step in the enforcement of security interest. ... Therefore, registration for an enterprise as an MSME is not a mandatory requirement but o....
2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2514 • India - High Court of Allahabad
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
10, 21) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The claimant supplied goods to the State and claimed payment ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the mandatory deposit under Section 19 is crucial for maintaining the integrity of ... The Interest Act is a beneficial piece of legislation intended to expedite timely payment of money owed to small-scale industries. Most of the contracts of supply or sale that small-scale industries enter into contain arbitration clauses. ... While interpreting ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
