AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion
Forgery in rental agreements and related contexts is treated as a serious offense, with penalties ranging from disciplinary actions to criminal prosecution. The severity depends on the nature of the forgery, intent, and impact, with legal provisions emphasizing fair investigation and proportional punishment. Courts recognize forgery as a grave misconduct, especially when committed intentionally for personal or financial gain, warranting strict penalties to uphold integrity and accountability.

Search Results for "Penalties for Forgery in Rental Agreements"

ATUL NAYAR VS IDEB GRAND REALITY PVT.  LTD.

India - Consumer

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR

Once the company had already received considerable amount from the applicants/buyers, this agreement was forced upon the allottees and the allottee had no option but to sign the agreement, as otherwise the agreement provided for heavy penalties and deduction from the money already deposited by the allottees ... Learned Counsel for the Opposite Parties vehemently argued that in this case, forgery, manipulations etc. have been alleged. He submitted that the case should be tried by the Civil Court. 10. ......

Dr. D. Sundararajan VS The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St. George, Chennai & Others

2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 5463 India - Madras

P.JYOTHIMANI

CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES 1982 - SECTION 17(b) - Prolonged Disciplinary proceedings - Unexplained delay - HELD - A grave charge of forgery ... dated 14. 1994 and therefore, the charges of suppression as well as forgery were framed. ... More curiously, with regard to the second charge which is grave, where there is an allegation of forgery, the finding has been arrived at by the Inquiry Officer on the basis of presumptions and assumptions on comparing the sale agreement dated 14. 1994 with the sale deed dated 17. 1994 and....

Ganesh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.  VS Dashrath Bajirao Nirgude And Kopergaon

India - Bombay

V.R.KINGAONKAR

It emphasized the gravity of the charges and the need for proportionality in imposing penalties. ... The court emphasized the gravity of the charges and the need for proportionality in imposing penalties. ... : The court emphasized the importance of fair enquiry, the gravity of the charges, and the need for proportionality in imposing penalties ... The dishonest misappropriation of the funds, forgery of the record and intentional misconduct of an employee would, however, be regarded as serious lapses. This Court in "Ther....

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2600 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ

This act of employee shows committing of forgery and indisciplinary of the employee which is a serious offence against the orders and discipline of the force. ... This act of employee shows committing of forgery and in-disciplinary of the employee which is a serious offence against the orders and discipline of the force. ... Muster Roll Account of month 1/07 but actually this amount was not recovered from the salary of force No. 941680111 of 103 Bn ASl(M) Sunil Kumar Singh and the acts of said force shows the forgery in the Govt. ... Ther....

N.  Pasupathy VS State Rep.  by The Inspector of Police

2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 703 India - Madras

P.VELMURUGAN

Chapter III dwells on “offences and penalties” and Section 13 thereunder sets out the contingencies under which a criminal misconduct is committed by a public servant. ... However, P.W.23 and P.W.24 have given due credit to the self acquired properties of D.W.5 and the rental income derived from the same. ... 40. ... The younger brother of the appellant namely N.Balasundaram is in affluent circumstances in that he has been doing agriculture in about 10 acres of land as well as manufacturing country bricks and also getting rental income. .....

Paulose, N. P.  VS State Of Kerala

2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 277 India - Kerala

M.RAMACHANDRAN, K.P.BALACHANDRAN

Rule 17, which states that the auction purchaser shall be liable to the penalties for any of the breach of the condition under the Rules, even in a case where formal licence is not issued. ... Taking notice of the allegation of forgery, earlier this Court had directed that the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ernakulam Range is to look into the matter. A report had been filed by the said officer. ... the agreement giving equal credit to the second petitioner. ... Because of the above, he was prevented from executing a regular #HL_START....

Tejas Pravin Dugad VS Union of India, through the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue

2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 203 India - Bombay

T.V.NALAWADE, M.G.SEWLIKAR

The court also considered the presumption of culpable mental state, the power of officers to effect arrest, and the compounding of ... The aforesaid specific provisions and scheme of the Act show that separate Chapters are given in the Act for determination of tax not paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed and for offences and penalties. ... It needs to be kept in mind that the allegations make out the case of forgery. 22. The aforesaid circumstances and position of law are sufficient for dismissal of all the pro....

Manoj Gokulchand Seksaria vs The State of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecutor

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6082 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

A. S. Gadkari, Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale, JJ

Specific allegations include forgery and misuse of bank accounts for personal gain at the expense of retail investors. ... While allowing the appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation Mr Justice Dipak Misra (as the learned Chief Justice then was) observed that the case involved allegations of forgery of documents to embezzle the funds of the bank. ... Notice dated 7th June, 2006 was issued, to the Petitioner, under the SEBI (Procedure for holding Inquiry and Imposing penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995, No. A & E/BS/6....

Govind Enterprises VS State of U. P.

2019 0 Supreme(All) 1563 India - Allahabad

MANOJ MISRA, SURESH KUMAR GUPTA

The Bureau of Investigation of Government of West Bengal conducted discreet investigation and found that the accused had committed forgery and impersonation to defraud sales tax amount. ... A perusal of the provisions of the FSS Act would make it clear that there is no bar for prosecution under the IPC merely because the provisions in the FSS Act prescribe penalties. We, therefore, set aside the finding of the High Court on the first point.” ... Presumption of culpable mental state. ... -In any prosecution for an offence under this Act wh....

Sri Lanka Venkata Subrahmanyam VS State of Telangana. , rep.  by Special PP of CBI, Hyderabad

2018 0 Supreme(AP) 524 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

Where there was no mensrea for the offences alleged of criminal conspiracy, breach of trust and forgery, at the most it amounted to a civil wrong. ... 50(e). The Apex Court in Union of India Vs. ... ... Rule 6 deals with the "penalties". ... All India service members can be put under suspension as per Rule 3 by the government of State where such member is serving. ... Emaar Properties PJSC, Dubai to revise the G.O.Ms.No.14, Sri LVS while moving a proposal to Industries and Commerce Department recommended a lease rental of 2% from Golf Co....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top