AI Overview...
-
Praveer Purkayastha - Legal Advocate and Supreme Court Jurist known for his involvement in high-profile cases and legal pronouncements. He has contributed significantly to jurisprudence, especially in matters related to criminal law, civil disputes, and constitutional rights. Multiple references
-
Definition of ‘Cruelty’ - Purkayastha has relied on Section 13(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act (HM Act) and Supreme Court judgments, notably in V. Bhagat vs. D. Bhagat (1994) SCC 337, to argue for divorce based on cruelty. His submissions emphasize that evidence supports the appellant’s claim for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty. Nilanjan Roy Choudhury S/o Late Pradyut Kumar Roy Choudhury VS Hiramoni Talukdar Roy Choudhury W/o. Sri. Nilanjan Roy Choudhury - Gauhati, Nilanjan Roy Choudhury VS Hiramoni Talukdar Roy Choudhury - Current Civil Cases
-
Supreme Court Ratios and Legal Principles - Purkayastha’s judgments and arguments are frequently cited in Supreme Court rulings, affirming legal principles such as the rights of accused persons, procedural compliance, and grounds for bail. Notably, in cases like Ashish Kakkar v. UT of Chandigarh and Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana, his interpretations have been upheld, reinforcing the importance of procedural fairness and rights of accused under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution. HEMANTH DATTA @ HEMANTHA @ BABY vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka, Vineet Jain, S/o Late Shri Ashok Kumar Jain vs Union Of India, Through The Standing Counsel (Public Prosecutor) Central Goods And Service Tax Department - Rajasthan, Shashank Mishra vs State Of Up - Allahabad
-
Bail and Arrest Procedures - His legal opinions stress that arresting authorities must provide written grounds of arrest, as mandated by Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), aligning with constitutional protections. Non-compliance can lead to quashing of detention orders, as seen in recent Supreme Court decisions. Manjeet Singh @ Inder @ Manjeet Singh Chana vs State Of U.P. - Allahabad, Shashank Mishra vs State Of Up - Allahabad
-
Judicial Influence - Purkayastha’s legal reasoning influences Supreme Court jurisprudence, especially regarding procedural safeguards, bail rights, and the interpretation of cruelty in matrimonial disputes. His arguments often serve as references in judgments that uphold individual rights and procedural fairness. Multiple references
Analysis and Conclusion
Praveer Purkayastha is a prominent legal figure whose arguments and interpretations have shaped important Supreme Court rulings on criminal procedure, matrimonial law, and constitutional rights. His emphasis on procedural correctness, especially regarding arrest procedures and grounds for bail, aligns with constitutional protections. Additionally, his reliance on statutory definitions and Supreme Court precedents in cases of cruelty and divorce underscores his expertise in family law. Overall, Purkayastha’s contributions reinforce the importance of legal safeguards and evidence-based judgments in Indian jurisprudence.
Search Results for "Praveer Purkayastha"
2019 0 Supreme(Gau) 466 • India - Gauhati
A.K.GOSWAMI, AJIT BORTHAKUR
S.D Purkayastha, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. ... Purkayastha vehemently submitted that in the facts and circumstances abundantly available on evidence, the appellant is entitled to a decree of divorce by dissolution of marriage with the respondent by setting aside the impugned judgment and order. ... Purkayastha referred to the definition of ‘cruelty’ defined in Section 13 (i-a) of the HM Act and relied on the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in V. Bhagat Vs. ....
• India - Current Civil Cases
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, AJIT BORTHAKUR
S.D Purkayastha, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. ... Purkayastha referred to the definition of ‘cruelty’ defined in Section 13 (i-a) of the HM Act and relied on the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in V. Bhagat Vs. D. Bhagat (Mrs), (1994) 1 SCC 337. Mr. ... Purkayastha vehemently submitted that in the facts and circumstances abundantly available on evidence, the appellant is entitled to a decree of divorce by dissolution of marriage with the respondent by setting....
2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11438 • India - Karnataka High Court
Unknown, J
In light of the ratio enunciated in Prabir Purkayastha (supra), the Apex Court in Ashish Kakkar v. UT of Chandigarh , in Crl A. ... The above ratios enunciated in Pankaj Bansal (supra) and Prabir Purkayastha (supra) have been further affirmed by the Apex Court in the case of Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2024 (8) SCC 25 VI. Syed Sajjad Ali v. Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence , W.P. ... In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT) of Delhi, 2024 (8) SCC 254, the Apex Court dealt with the challenge to the order....
2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 1779 • India - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
Order : (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J.) 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. ... Director General of GST Intelligence, Delhi, (2024) SCC OnLine Del 8949, wherein the Delhi High Court, after relying upon the decisions of Prabir Purkayastha Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (supra) and Pankaj Bansal Vs. ... Union of India (supra) and Prabir Purkayastha Vs. State NCT Delhi (supra) has categorically held that the Agency must furnis....
2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11548 • India - Karnataka High Court
Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J
[(2024) 7 SCC 576] ] and Prabir Purkayastha vs State (NCT of Delhi), [ a href="./.. ... It is to be noted here that in Vihaan Kumar, there is reference to Pankaj Bansal and Prabir Purkayastha, but it appears that Ram Kishor Arora was not cited. ... State of Haryana and Another[2025 SCC OnLine SC 269], the Apex Court, following the principles of law laid down in Pankaj Bansal (supra) and Prabir Purkayastha (supra), had finally settled the law by holding as under: 21. ... It is mentioned in the charge sheet that after the murder of #HL_STAR....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 2302 • India - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J, Praveen Kumar Giri, J.
Further, the right of an arrested person to be informed in writing of the grounds of arrest and furnishing of such written grounds to the arrested person was made an imperative requirement of law in Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi), LAWS(SC)-2024-5-46, and Pankaj Bansal v. ... Accordingly, this, being a clear non-compliance of the mandate under Section 50 of the Code which has been introduced to give effect to Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India, 1950, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in Prabir #HL_S....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 2216 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, ANIL KUMAR-X
(2012) 8 SCC 1 (Paras 484-488) Prabir Purkayastha (Supra), Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India , LAWS (SC)-2023-10-3, Vihaan Kumar Vs. ... In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner preferred an application dated 29.04.2025 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jhansi, praying for setting aside of the remand order in light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Prabir Purkayastha ... Heard Sri Praveen Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Paritosh Malviya, learned AGA-I for the Stat....
2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21904 • India - High Court of Kerala
C.S. DIAS, J
In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2024 SCC OnLine SC 934], the Honourable Supreme Court has observed as follows:- “21.
2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 83263 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2024 SCC OnLine SC 934], the Honourable Supreme Court has observed as follows:- “21.
2025 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 145 • India - High Court of Delhi
MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
It is submitted that irrespective of the nature of offence, he is entitled to bail as grounds of arrest were not given in writing for which reliance is placed on Prabir Purkayastha vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024 SCC OnLine SC 934 and Pankaj Bansal vs. ... Further, the Applicant has placed reliance on Prabir Purkayastha (supra) and Pankaj Bansal (supra) to support the proposition that an accused is entitled to bail if grounds of arrest are not given to him in writing, though this again is not supported by the record. ... The Applicant has placed reliance o....
Filter by Legal Phrase
