AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The overarching principle from these sources is that in attachment before judgment under the CPC, courts must direct the defendant to furnish security—preferably in a form satisfactory to the court—before ordering attachment of property. Procedural compliance with mandatory rules (Order 38 Rule 5 and related provisions) is critical; failure to do so renders the attachment illegal. Courts recognize various forms of security, including security bonds and bank guarantees, and emphasize that security given as a mere security (e.g., cheques not linked to enforceable debts) should not be treated as enforceable claims or assets for attachment. Overall, securing the property through proper security measures is a prerequisite for lawful attachment proceedings.

Search Results for "Respondent Furnish Security Instead of Attachment Property Case Lays"

Gurpreet Singh VS Ab.  Gani Dar

2010 0 Supreme(J&K) 618 India - Jammu and Kashmir

Hasnain Massodi

5, emphasizing the need for the defendant to furnish security to prevent disposal or removal of the property in question. ... Fact of the Case: The plaintiff filed an application for attachment of the defendant's property before judgment, alleging ... security, and the procedural errors in the Trial Court's orders. ... furnish security. ... It is only in the event of failure of the defendant to show cause against the order requiri....

Nidhi Clearing and Forwarding Company, per Managing Partner, Sri K. Ravi Kumar VS Associated Cement Companies Ltd. ,per Manager (Marketing), R. Venkatramani

1995 0 Supreme(AP) 981 India - Andhra Pradesh

K.B.SIDDAPPA

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, Or39, Rule 5 - Attachment before judgment not complying with mandatory provisions of Rule 5 (II) is illegal ... Procedure laid, down under Rule 5(I) is mandatory - Issuance of General Notice to defendant is not sufficient compliance for ordering attachment ... V (under Order 38 Rule 5) calling the respondent to furnish security in such sum as may be specified in the Order or require the respondent to produce the property itself or such portion th....

BRAHMPAL SINGH VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2007 0 Supreme(All) 2245 India - Allahabad

JANARDAN SAHAI

Bench directed petitioners to furnish security to the satisfaction of the District Judge other than in the form of cash or bank ... guarantee—A registered security bond in addition is a better security—Hence, claim of petitioner that a security bond does not require ... (Indian) Registration Act, 1908—Section 17(2)—Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order XLI, Rule 6—Security bond—Registration of—Division ... This court modified the order of the District Judge and instead ....

Rajesh Kumar Goel VS Mamta

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 1618 India - Madras

K.KALYANASUNDARAM

The respondent sought attachment before judgment of the defendant's property under Order 38 Rule 5, Sections 94(b), 136 and 151 of ... security before passing a final order of attachment. ... 94(b), 136 and 151 of C.P.C] Fact of the Case: The respondent filed a suit against the petitioner for recovery of money ... Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC clearly lays down that a Court at the first instance must direct the defendant to furnish #HL_ST....

J. Rama Murthy VS S. C. General M. and C. Agents

1987 0 Supreme(AP) 517 India - Andhra Pradesh

V.BHASKARA RAO

11-A the claim shall be adjudicated upon in the manner provided by the earlier provisions of CPC, for adjudication of claims to property ... attached in execution of a decree for the payment of money It is Order 21 Rule 58 that provides for adjudication of the claims of property ... It is O. 38, R. 6 that contemplates passing of an order of attachment before Judgment in cases where the defendant fails to furnish security or shall not show cause why such a direction to furnish #HL_START....

The Allahabad Bank Ltd.  VS Rana Sheo Amber Singh

1976 0 Supreme(All) 91 India - Allahabad

T.S.MISRA, PREMPRAKASH

Fact of the Case: The Bank made application under Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure for attachment of ... The Bank applied on 2nd April, 1957 for attachment of the Kothi of Rai Bahadur Sheo Pratap Singh as also for attachment of the kothi ... Case No. 31 of 1956. ... Rule 5, Order 38 clearly lays down that before an order of attachment can be made it is incumbent on the court to direct the defendant to furnish security#HL_EN....

C. M.  Smith and Sons.  Ltd.  VS State of Gujarat

2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 161 India - Gujarat

GITA GOPI

also, evidently, cheque in question was given as 'security' and not in respect of any 'enforceable debt', which applicant No.1-Company ... ought to have returned cheque in question to applicant No.1-Company instead of depositing same - In considered opinion of this Court ... was required to pay to respondent-complainant - Thus, as per admission of complainant also, cheque in question was not issued in ... Smith at Nadiad for serving the Warrant of Attachment, the respondent is given 11 cheques. The Elev....

J. RAM MURTHY VS Srinivas Corporation General Merchants and Commission Agents 5-3-775/9 Thokphana, Hyderabad

1987 0 Supreme(AP) 518 India - Andhra Pradesh

V.BHASKARA RAO

11 & 11-A- Court that decreed a suit can continue inquiry into a petition filed under Rule 8 pending suit for raising order of attachment ... It is Order 38 Rule 6 that contemplates passing of an order of attachment before Judgment in cases where the defendant fails to furnish security or shall not show cause why such a direction to furnish security shall not be issued, etc. Order 38 rule 8 C. ... It was an attachment before Judgment in a suit filed for recovery of mo....

The Federal Bank Ltd.  VS Indiradevi Kunjamma and others

1984 0 Supreme(Bom) 286 India - Bombay

G.F.COUTO

Fact of the Case: The appellant Bank filed a suit against the respondents for recovery of an amount based on an advance ... Insurance Policy - Attachment of Monies - Sec. 60(kb) Civil Procedure Code - Sec. 39 of the Insurance Act - [Sec. 60(kb) Civil ... The appellant sought attachment of Insurance Policies before judgment, which was initially granted but later dismissed. ... Sec.60 Civil.Procedure Code deals with the property which is liable to attachment and sale in execution of a ....

C. M.  Smith and Sons.  Ltd.  Through Deinesh Mohanlal Panchal VS State of Gujarat

India - Crimes

GITA GOPI

’ – Proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act would lie only in respect of any ‘enforceable debt’ – Respondent-complainant itself has ... 482 read with Article 226 of Constitution of India – Dishonour of cheque – Issuance of process – Cheque in question was given as ‘security ... stated that cheque in question has been given in view of compromise arrived at between parties – Cheque in question was given as ‘security ... Smith at Nadiad for serving the Warrant of Attachment, the respondent is given 11 cheq....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top