AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Rule 20 of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 - Main points and insights:
  • It prescribes the procedure for initiating disciplinary proceedings against government employees, including the requirement for a show cause notice, inquiry, and opportunity to be heard before imposing penalties (INDAP00000113955; 00200046641; 00200033113).
  • It emphasizes that disciplinary action should follow a proper inquiry process, ensuring fairness and adherence to procedural rules (INDAP00000113955; 00200053767).
  • The rule applies to various misconduct cases such as misappropriation of funds, misconduct, or other violations, requiring the disciplinary authority to act based on grounds for inquiry (04300002434; 00200056697).
  • Non-compliance with Rule 20, such as skipping the inquiry process or improper procedures, can lead to legal challenges or orders for reinstatement (00200053767; 00200058882).

  • Analysis and Conclusion:

  • Rule 20 is a crucial procedural safeguard ensuring disciplinary proceedings are conducted fairly and transparently.
  • Courts and tribunals have emphasized adherence to Rule 20, and failure to follow its provisions can result in quashing disciplinary actions or ordering reinstatement.
  • Proper compliance with Rule 20 is essential for maintaining the legality and validity of disciplinary measures against Andhra Pradesh government employees.

References: - Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 - Rule 20 INDAP00000113955; 04300002434; 00200056697 - Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rule 20 00200033113; 00200053767 - Relevant case law discussing procedural violations and the importance of Rule 20 compliance 00100002872; 00200046641; 00200058882

Search Results for "Rule 20 Andhra Pradesh Cca Rules"

M.V. Ramana Murthy vs State of A.P. through its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Regn-I) Department and others

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14483 India - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Ms. B. S. Bhanumathi, J

(A) Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 - Rule 20 - Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980 - Rule 9 - Disciplinary ... jurisdiction - The court found that disciplinary proceedings could continue post-retirement under certain conditions established by Rule ... Rule 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules,....

B. V. V. Ramana Rao VS State of Andhra Pradesh

India - Andhra Pradesh

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

*Rule 20. ... Proceedings Tribunal) Act, 1960 or the Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta and Upa-lokayukta Act, 1983, where such inquiry is held under the said Acts. (2) Whenever the Disciplinary Authority is of the opinion that there are grounds for inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour against ... He further submitted that since, the petitioner fabricated the proceedings dated 12.12.2012 under which his services were regularized, as such, the petitioner does not have any right to claim whatsoeve....

M.  Kumara Swamy VS State of Telangana

2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 54 India - Telangana

SUREPALLI NANDA

Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 - Rule-20(2) - Misappropriation of Funds - Disciplinary ... Rule 20 (2) of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991, read as under: “(2) Whenever the disciplinary authority is of the opinion that there are grounds for inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehavior against a Government servant, it may ....

Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, A. P. , Hyderabad VS T. Bhaskar Rao

2006 0 Supreme(AP) 112 India - Andhra Pradesh

J.CHELAMESWAR, M.E.N.PATRUDU

S (CCA) Rules - Rule-20 - Impugned order - Promotion post of superintendent - Principal Chief Conservator of forests, Andhra Pradesh ... S (CCA) Rules in O. ... -20 of A. ... (ii) If he is on leave or under suspension or otherwise absent be communicated to him by registered post to the address given by him, if any, or of his usual place of residence; (iii) If it cannot be served or communicated, be published in Andhra#HL_E....

V.  Shivanna VS A. P.  State Housing Corporation Limited, Rep.  by its Managing Director

2015 0 Supreme(AP) 187 India - Andhra Pradesh

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

APCS (Conduct) rules 1964 – Rule 3 – APSHCL, (Conduct) Rules 1997 – Employment and Service matter – Dismissal ... with State Housing Corporation Limited, mounts a challenge to legality and validity of the order passed on by first respondent Andhra ... Pradesh State Housing Corporation Limited imposing on him the punishment of dismissal from service, apart from ordering for recovery ... Hence, it is contended that the Inquiry has not been conducted in accordance with Rule-20#H....

State of A. P.  VS N. Radhakishan

1998 3 Supreme 584 India - Supreme Court

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR

Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1963 and 1991-Rules 19 and 20 respectively) Case Law discussed. ... (Para 20) ... Held finally : Accordingly we do not find any merit in ... Normally, disciplinary proceedings should be allowed to take its course as per relevant rules but then delay defeats justice. ... While the memo No. 1412 had been issued under Rule 19 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules#HL_END....

Meka Rama Murthy, S/o.  late Suryanarayana VS State of Andhra Pradesh School Education Department, represented by its Principal Secretary

2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1306 India - Andhra Pradesh

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Section 79 - Writ Petition ... following the procedure laid down under the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982, and without conducting an inquiry, leading to the ... (Paras 20 and 21) Facts of the case: The Petitioner was terminated from service without ... 20 of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 duly issuing deemed to r....

R.  Shiva Narayana VS Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, A. P.  Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad

2013 0 Supreme(AP) 795 India - Andhra Pradesh

K.G.SHANKAR

Jyothi Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Disciplinary Authority did not follow Rule 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 (‘CCA Rules’ for short). ... In his reply dated 21.6.2005, the petitioner contended that the provisions of Rule 20 of CCA Rules have not been followed. However, it has not been clearly stated as to wh....

K. Suresh Babu VS Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nellore

2008 0 Supreme(AP) 587 India - Andhra Pradesh

G.CHANDRAIAH, V.V.S.RAO

AP Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules 1991 (CCA Rules) - Rule 21 (2):- Where the authorities want to conduct ... officer who had acquitted him earlier had not properly appreciated evidence, it is mandatory to issue a show cause notice under Rule ... 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 (CCA Rules, for brevity). ... However, ....

State of Andhra Pradesh VS A.  Nakshtramma

2021 0 Supreme(AP) 368 India - Andhra Pradesh

JOYMALYA BAGCHI, K.SURESH REDDY

REMOVAL FROM SERVICE - CANCELLATION OF SCHEDULED CASTE CERTIFICATE - RULE 20 OF THE ANDHRA PRADESH CIVIL SERVICES (CLASSIFICATION ... 20 of the CCA Rules. ... 20 of the CCA Rules had not been followed. ... ’), directing the petitioners herein to reinstate the respondent-employee into service and conduct enquiry strictly following Rule 20 of the Andhra ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top