AI Overview...
-
Tenant Rights under Securitisation Act -
Tenants inducted prior to the creation of security interests generally cannot be summarily evicted under Sections 13(4) and 14 of the Securitisation Act. Their rights are protected unless the possession is taken over by bona fide tenants or lessees, and courts have recognized that such tenants cannot be dispossessed without following due process Deepak Aggarwal VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Current Civil Cases, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Dishonour Of Cheque, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. , rep. by its Branch Manager, Alappuzha District - Kerala, Modinasab Indikar VS Board Of Directors Of Indian Overseas Bank - Bombay. -
Rights of Bona Fide Tenants and Eviction Procedures -
The Act does not grant secured creditors the authority to infringe upon tenant rights or evict tenants without adhering to legal procedures. Eviction of tenants inducted before the security interest was created requires following the applicable rent control or tenancy laws, and cannot be summarily executed under Sections 13(4) and 14 N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Current Civil Cases, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. , rep. by its Branch Manager, Alappuzha District - Kerala, J. VEERAIAH VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK - Andhra Pradesh. -
Approach under Section 17 and Tribunal Proceedings -
Tenants or de facto tenants have the right to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17(4A) to contest possession actions taken under the Securitisation Act. Courts have emphasized that tenants can challenge eviction proceedings and seek relief through the Tribunal, especially when their rights are affected SALMA Versus GIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED - Kerala. -
Interplay with Other Laws and Overriding Effect -
The Securitisation Act's provisions override other tenancy laws, but this does not permit arbitrary eviction. The Transfer of Property Act and Rent Control Acts still influence eviction rights, and courts have held that tenants cannot be evicted without following due legal process, including notices and adherence to local tenancy laws N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. , rep. by its Branch Manager, Alappuzha District - Kerala, V. S. Sivan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Current Civil Cases. -
Summary and Legal Position -
Overall, the legal framework emphasizes protecting tenants' rights against eviction under securitisation proceedings unless specific conditions are met, such as the tenant being a lessee prior to security interest creation. Secured creditors must follow prescribed legal procedures, including notices and tribunal processes, and cannot bypass tenant protections arbitrarily Deepak Aggarwal VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Current Civil Cases, N. P. Pushpangadan VS Federal Bank Ltd. - Dishonour Of Cheque.
Conclusion:
While the Securitisation Act facilitates the enforcement of security interests, it does not permit automatic or summary eviction of tenants inducted before the security interest was created. Tenants retain protections under tenancy laws and can challenge eviction proceedings in tribunals, ensuring a balance between creditor rights and tenant protections.
Search Results for "Securitisation Act Tenant"
2012 0 Supreme(UK) 656 • India - Uttarakhand
SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Securitisation Act - Tenant - Section 13(2) - Section 17 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the rights of a tenant ... 13(2) of the Securitisation Act, claiming no liability towards the Bank. ... Issues: The issues involved the rights of a tenant in a premises subject to proceedings under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation ... However if the secured assets is in the possession of a bona fide lessee or tenant, he c....
• India - Current Civil Cases
J.CHELAMESWAR, K.T.SANKARAN, P.N.RAVINDRAN
of Securitisation Act do not confer any such right on secured creditor to trench upon rights of tenant inducted by borrower ... be summarily evicted under Sections 13 (4) and 14 of Securitisation Act—Such a tenant whose right, title, interest or possession ... Section 17 of Securitisation Act. ... A tenant inducted in the premises before creation of the security interest cannot be summarily evicted under Sections 13 (4) and 14....
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
J.CHELAMESWAR, K.T.SANKARAN, P.N.RAVINDRAN
11—Possession of secured asset—Rights of tenant—By taking recourse to provisions of Securitisation Act pre-existing ... 14 of Securitisation Act—Such a tenant whose right, title, interest or possession is affected by a measure taken under Section 13 ... of tenant—A tenant inducted in premises before creation of security interest cannot be summarily evicted under Sections 13 (4) and ... A tenant inducted in the premises before creati....
2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4515 • India - High Court of Kerala
N. NAGARESH, J
Securitisation - Writ Petition - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act ... enabling petitioners to defer possession proceedings to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17(4A), highlighting tenant ... Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the petitioners, as de facto tenants, have the right to contest possession actions ... The petitioners have right to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17(4A) of the Secu....
• India - Current Civil Cases
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 65-A & 111 — Tenant — Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement ... of Security Interest Act, 2002 — Section 13 & 14 — Petitioner tenant of building — Over which security interest created by borrower ... after issuance of notice to the tenant and to proceed with further steps accordingly. ... It has been categorically stated that, Banks cannot take the law into their hands and forcefully evict a tenant#HL_EN....
2011 0 Supreme(Ker) 837 • India - Kerala
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.CHELAMESWAR, K.T.SANKARAN
Whether a tenant under the provisions of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act of a premise which is the subject matter ... of securitisation proceedings can be summarily evicted under Sections 13 (4) and 14 of the Securitisation Act irrespective of the ... and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'Securitisation Act') has an overriding effect over the provisions of ... A tenant inducted in the premises ....
2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 606 • India - Bombay
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
under the Securitisation Act. ... the Bank's actions under the Securitisation Act. ... Securitisation Act - Tenancy - Section 13, Section 14, Section 17(4), Section 34, Section 65A of the Securitisation and Reconstruction ... In this context, on the tenant''s rights, we may examine the interplay between Section 17(4A) of the Securitisation Act and Section 65(A) of the Transfer of Property Act. .......
2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42649 • India - High Court of Kerala
S. SIRI JAGAN, J
J U D G M E N T =========== The petitioners challenges proceedings under the Securitisation ... be evicted only in accordance with the Rent Control Act. ... and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 584 • India - Kerala
M.N.KRISHNAN, M.RAMACHANDRAN
35 - Tenant cannot claim possession - Findings of - Held, Tenant appears to have been divested of possession as a consequence of ... provisions effectively nullify the rights normally admissible even to a tenant, as available under the Rent Control Act, as it can ... borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realizing the secured asset - Provisions of the Securitisation ... This was to oblige the tenant. There was huge default in repayment of the ....
2017 0 Supreme(AP) 563 • India - Andhra Pradesh
P.V.SANJAY KUMAR, G.SHYAM PRASAD
of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Eviction – Tenant – Protection under Act - Five petitioners ... Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 – Securitisation and Reconstruction ... Petitioners 3 to 5 claim to be living in the said property along with the tenants. ... The 1st respondent bank thereupon issued a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
