AI Overview...
-
Single Injury - Multiple cases involve allegations of a single injury inflicted during the incident, often with no evidence of injury repetition or multiple injuries. Many courts have considered the nature and seriousness of the single injury when deciding bail, especially noting whether it was grievous or simple, and whether it was life-threatening or on vital parts of the body. For example, in Suresh VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, injury No.1 was declared dangerous to life; in MAHAVEER SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, a single gunshot injury was considered, and in Mahesh @ Bhinya Ram VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, the single injury was deemed trivial and not causing death.
-
Nature of Injury - The severity (grievous or simple), location (vital or non-vital parts), and whether the injury was life-threatening influence bail decisions. Several sources highlight that a single, non-life-threatening injury, especially if not on vital organs, tends to favor bail (MAHAVEER SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, Mahesh @ Bhinya Ram VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Manpreet Kaur @ Kaka VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana).
-
Absence of Repetition and Witness Evidence - Courts often note the lack of multiple injuries or witness examination when granting bail, emphasizing that no injury was repeated or attributed to the accused beyond the initial incident (Joginder Singh @ Lala VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Daul Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Gurtej Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana).
-
Intention and Circumstances - The intent behind inflicting the single injury and the triviality of the incident are considered. Cases mention that if the injury was inflicted on a trivial matter or without malicious intent, bail is more likely (Manpreet Kaur @ Kaka VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Daul Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan).
-
Juvenile and Procedural Aspects - In cases involving juveniles or where no injury was attributed directly to the petitioner, courts tend to favor bail (Suresh VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana).
Analysis and Conclusion:
Courts generally grant anticipatory or regular bail in cases involving a single injury under Section 307 IPC when the injury is non-grievous, not life-threatening, and there is no evidence of repeated injuries or malicious intent. The trivial nature of the injury, absence of witness testimony, and lack of injury attribution to the petitioner are significant factors favoring bail. Overall, the presence of a single, simple injury tends to be viewed as insufficient grounds for denying bail, especially when other circumstances point towards a less culpable situation.
Search Results for "Single Injury Bail in 307"
2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 1195 • India - Punjab and Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
is attributed to him and to other petitioner only a single injury is attributed--Bail granted--Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.307 & ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.438--Anticipatory Bail--Attempt to Murder--Grievous Hurt--One petitioner is juvenile and no injury ... From the record, I find that as per the allegations, injury No.1 on the person of Naveen was declared dangerous to life and is attributed to petitioner Suresh. The grievous injury No.3 h....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 412 • India - Punjab and Haryana
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.307--Attempt to Murder--Bail--Petitioner inflicted a single injury with knife--Petitioner did not repeat ... the injury--Incident originated on a trivial matter therefore whether the petitioner had requisite intention to commit attempt to ... murder would be moot point during trial--Moreover, petitioner is a lady in custody for 5½ months and not even a single witness is ... Precisely, the prosecution claimed that on 02.12.2013, the petitioner inflicted a #HL_....
2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 3471 • India - Punjab and Haryana
AJAY TEWARI
witness has been examined and they are not attributed a single injury to the deceased – Bail granted – Indian Penal Code, 1860, S ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.439 – Bail – Murder – Petitioners have been in custody for more than two years and not a single ... .302 & S.307. ... Learned Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners have been in custody more than two years and not a single witness has been examined and they are not attributed a #HL_S....
2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 1514 • India - Rajasthan
SANDEEP MEHTA
149, Indian Penal Code – the petitioner is granted bail as the injury ... 439 Bail application – F.I.R. lodged under – S. ... Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the solitary injury on the head of deceased Devi Singh, which resulted into his death, is attributed to co-accused Laxman Singh. Thus, he submits that the petitioners deserve to be released on bail. ... Pali, for the offences under Sections 148, 302, 302/149, 307, 307/149, 323....
2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 1685 • India - Rajasthan
H.R.PANWAR
Single Gunshot Injury - Bail Application - The court considered the severity of the gunshot injury and the opinions of the doctors ... IPC and not beyond that due to a single gunshot injury. ... Issues: Severity of the gunshot injury, applicability of Section 307 IPC, and the suitability for suspension of sentence. ... ... ( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant-appellant that it is a case of single gun shot....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 897 • India - Rajasthan
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307 and 302/34 of IPC, considering the single injury sustained by the deceased, the trivial nature ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the deceased sustained a single injury and there was no repetition of the ... Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the single injury sustained by the deceased, the absence of repetition of the blow, ... He further submits that the deceased received a single injury....
2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 1750 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Issues: The issues revolved around the seriousness of the injury, the intention behind the single injury, and the petitioner's ... The court considered the single injury inflicted and the absence of repetition to cause death, leading to a debatable intention. ... The doctor's opinion on the seriousness of the injury was a point of contention, but the court allowed the petition for bail without ... At this stage, without meaning anything on the merits of the case, it ....
2012 0 Supreme(P&H) 851 • India - Punjab and Haryana
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
to have caused single kirpan blow on the chest of the complainant--He did not repeat any injury--Whether he had the requisite intention ... co-accused of petitioner, have already been allowed bail--Bail granted--Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.307. ... entailing the provisions of Section 307 IPC or not, would be the moot point to be decided during the course of trial by all other ... He is stated to have caused single kirpan blow on the chest of the complainant. He did not....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 483 • India - Punjab and Haryana
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
version--Petitioner also suffered grievous injury--Not even a single witness has been examined till date--Bail granted--Criminal ... Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.307--Attempt to Murder--Gunshot injury--Bail--Allegation that petitioner has fired shot, which landed ... on left high of complainant--Injury is simple in nature and on non-vital part of the body of complainant--Case of version and cross ... It is not a matter of dispute that, injury attribute....
2016 0 Supreme(All) 3829 • India - Allahabad
HARSH KUMAR
The injury report showed a single non-life-threatening injury on the neck. ... incident where he was accused of causing a neck injury with a knife. ... , 506, and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. ... to applicant while in her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. the victim has assigned the role of causing neck injury to applicant and Govind collectively; that injury report shows a single injury on neck which has not been mentioned as da....
Filter by Legal Phrase
