AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 - Less Meritorious Candidates Considered
  • Several court cases and government orders have addressed issues related to the fixation of qualifying marks and the consideration of candidates in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) and subsequent recruitment processes.
  • Main Points and Insights:
    • Arbitrary Fixing of Qualifying Marks: Courts have scrutinized government orders that set qualifying marks, alleging they were arbitrary and aimed to disqualify certain candidates, especially Shiksha Mitras, from appointment (02500106704).
    • Merit and Reservation Policies: The selection process involves merit based on marks obtained in the TET, with provisions for reserved category candidates (01700056403, 00100064181). Candidates qualifying under OBC and other reserved categories are often permitted to migrate to the general category if they surpass certain merit thresholds (00100064181).
    • Reservation and Merit Adjustment: Vertical reservation policies require that reserved candidates be adjusted into the unreserved category upon achieving specified merit marks, but this process is subject to legal scrutiny to ensure it does not compromise meritorious selection (02500116609).
    • Evaluation and Scoring Methods: Use of scaling and standardized scoring methods has been discussed to ensure fairness across different tests and candidates (00200053536).
    • Legal and Court Interventions: Courts have issued interim orders preventing appointments beyond advertised posts and emphasizing that selection must adhere strictly to the prescribed criteria, including merit and reservation norms (02500112031).
    • Impact of Relaxed Norms: Relaxed pass norms for reserved categories like OBC have been upheld in some cases, allowing candidates with lower marks to qualify, provided they meet the criteria (00100064181).
    • Government Orders and Policies: The government’s fixation of qualifying marks and conduct of the 2018 TET have been challenged for their fairness and adherence to constitutional principles (02500105662).
  • Analysis and Conclusion:
  • The legal landscape indicates ongoing debates over the fairness of qualifying marks, reservation adjustments, and merit-based selection in TET 2018. Courts have emphasized adherence to constitutional mandates, ensuring that reserved category candidates are given fair opportunity without undermining merit.
  • The consideration of less meritorious candidates in some cases stems from reservation policies and relaxed norms, but these are balanced against the need for merit-based recruitment.
  • Overall, the cases reflect a tension between reservation policies, merit, and procedural fairness in teacher recruitment, with judicial interventions aiming to uphold constitutional principles and fairness in appointments.

Search Results for "Teacher Eligibility Test 2018 Less Meritorious Candidate Considered"

Raghvendra Pratap Singh VS State of U. P.  Throu.  Prin.  Secy.  (Basic Education) Lko.

2020 0 Supreme(All) 600 India - Allahabad

PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL, KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR

and other connected matters filed challenging Government Order by which State Government has fixed qualifying marks of Assistant Teacher ... arbitrary and with a view to eradicate/disqualify the petitioners (Shiksha Mitras) from being appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher ... Union of India and others and connected writ petitions [(2018) 13 SCC 560]. ... as to the eligible candidates on the basis of having qualified the Central Teachers Eligibility Test. ... for ....

Nikki VS State of Rajasthan

2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 888 India - Rajasthan

S.RAVINDRA BHAT, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Facts of the case: Petitioners questioned legality of cutoff marks relating to recruitment to post of Teacher ... precluded her or him from securing slot in open merit category – Implicit in those cases was fact that reserved category candidate ... 13: Recruitment Process (2) State level merit list will be prepared on the basis of maximum marks obtained by the candidates in the Rajasthan Teacher Eligibility Test Examination, filled by the candidate in the application....

GOVT.  OF NCT DELHI VS PRADEEP KUMAR

2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1188 India - Supreme Court

R.BANUMATHI, A.S.BOPANNA, HRISHIKESH ROY

(Para 15) (b) Service law - Recruitment - Reservation - A candidate qualifying at CTET as OBC candidate - Obtaining ... more marks than the last candidate in general category in qualifying examination - Cannot be permitted to migrate to general category ... No. 1047 of 2014 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and the same was allowed on 20.08.2018 (Annexure P/5). ... Central Teacher Eligibility Test qualification, under the relaxed pass norms for the OBC ....

Haryana Staff Selection Commission VS Priyanka And Others Etc.

2022 5 Supreme 189 India - Supreme Court

VINEET SARAN, DINESH MAHESHWARI

meritorious candidates at the cost of meritorious one has to be eschewed – Inter se merit would depend upon candidates facing interview ... at cost of more meritorious eligible candidates of same selection process – Selections against posts which were ordered to be kept ... result before the cut-off date were eligible to be considered in the selection process in question. ... In other words, any eventuality leading to the advantage of less ....

Shikha Singh VS State of U. P.

2019 0 Supreme(All) 2070 India - Allahabad

PRAKASH PADIA

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Recruitment – Eligibility – State Government has also issued ... government order for conducting an examination, known as Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination 2018 –– Subsequently, the State ... for conducting an examination, known as Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination 2018 – In pursuance of the aforesaid government ... meritorious reserved category candidates are considered. ... cases of #HL_ST....

Mahendra Pal VS State of U. P.

2024 0 Supreme(All) 1172 India - Allahabad

ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, BRIJ RAJ SINGH

B) Reservation Policy - Applicability of vertical reservation governed by merits in an open competition mandates adjustment for Meritorious ... Reserved Candidates into the unreserved category upon attaining specified merit marks. ... Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 - Section 3(6) - Quashing of select list for Assistant Teachers ... and passed teacher eligibility test, conducted by the Government or by the Government of India and passed Assistan....

Jairuddin Shaik VS State of Andhra Pradesh

2020 0 Supreme(AP) 814 India - Andhra Pradesh

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

raised, SMEs work on that and with customer consultation finalize to ignore some objected questions and remaining questions will be considered ... Constitution of India,1950 – Articles 1,2,14,16,21 and 226 - Evaluation of marks - Examinations - Recruitment - Post of Secondary Grade Teachers ... experts have evolved a method known as scaling, that is creation of scaled score - Scaling places scores from different tests or test ... No. 67 dated 26.10.2018 containing notification for Teacher #HL_START....

Rohit Verma VS State of U. P.  Thru Addl.  Chief Secy.  Higher Edu.  Lukcnow

2020 0 Supreme(All) 605 India - Allahabad

MANISH KUMAR

Higher Education Services Commission(Procedure for Selection of Teachers) Regulations, 2014 – Regulation 6(2) – U.P. ... Against 63 vacancies for OBC Category, 385 candidates were called and the last candidate has scored 133.34 marks. ... shall not be debarred from further selection if the candidate has scored higher marks than cut off marks fixed for the candidates ... In this case, the Apex Court held that once a candidate appears in the examination pursuant to a concession granted b....

KANCHAN BALA VS STATE OF U. P.

2018 0 Supreme(All) 115 India - Allahabad

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI

given in first page of question booklet to correctly fill up OMR sheet – Any error committed by candidate cannot be corrected by ... Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 – Rule 14(3) – Examination – UPTET – OMR Answer sheet – Rectification of – Clear instructions ... Passing of TeachersEligibility Test has been laid down as one of the qualifications, which is to be possessed by a candidate for appointment as a teacher. ... On 11.2.2011, the National Counci....

Mahendra Pal VS State of U. P. , Thru Addl.  Chief Secy.  Deptt.  of Basic Edu.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 337 India - Allahabad

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

interim order - Court while issuing notice to affected persons directed that, in the meantime, appointments made on post of Assistant Teacher ... Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 - U.P. ... is settled law that an authority cannot make selection/ appointment beyond the number of posts advertised, since it deprives the candidates ... expressions were defined in Rule 2 as under : "(s) "Teacher Eligibility Test" means the Teacher Eligibility#HL_END....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top