AI Overview...
-
Mutation of Revenue Records - Several cases highlight the challenges and legal procedures involved in getting names mutated in revenue records. Courts emphasize the importance of a legal basis for entries and the authority of revenue officials, such as Tahsildars and Deputy Commissioners, to make or review changes. Many petitioners attempted to have their names mutated but faced rejection due to lack of proper entries, non-compliance, or procedural issues Amrawati VS Dy. Director of Consolidation - Allahabad, Maharaj Himmat Singh VS Union of India - Rajasthan, ANJANA SAMJI CHELA VS ANJANA HIRJI AHIJI - Gujarat, DIST. COLLECTOR, R. R. DIST. VS KADICHERLA NARSIMHA - Andhra Pradesh, SMT. JAIBUNNISA W/O. LATE SYED MOHAMMED SHA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - Karnataka, SHRI. BALASAHEB S/O. PARASHURAM SHEDAKE vs SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O. GUNDU SHARABIDRI - Karnataka.
-
Legal and Procedural Challenges - Courts have upheld the rejection of mutation requests when petitioners failed to establish proper legal grounds or when revenue records did not reflect their claims. Several judgments note that revenue entries are presumed correct unless challenged with valid legal proof, and the absence of mutation does not necessarily imply invalidity of ownership or claims Ramcharan VS Damodar - Madhya Pradesh, PRAFULLABA VANRAJSINH JADEJA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat.
-
Impact of Will and Deceased Records - In cases involving inheritance or succession, courts scrutinize whether revenue records were mutated based on valid wills or legal heirs. Lack of mutation or failure to act upon legal rights can hinder claims, as seen in cases where the Will was not acted upon or the mutation was not carried out in favor of heirs SHRI. BALASAHEB S/O. PARASHURAM SHEDAKE vs SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O. GUNDU SHARABIDRI - Karnataka, SHRI. BALASAHEB S/O. PARASHURAM SHEDAKE vs SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O. GUNDU SHARABIDRI - Karnataka.
-
Court's View on Mutation Claims - Courts generally maintain that mutation is a procedural matter and does not alter ownership rights unless properly established. Petitioners often need to prove their entitlement through legal documents, and failure to do so results in rejection of mutation applications Amrawati VS Dy. Director of Consolidation - Allahabad, Maharaj Himmat Singh VS Union of India - Rajasthan.
Analysis and Conclusion: Getting names mutated in revenue records requires a valid legal basis and adherence to procedural norms. Courts recognize revenue entries as presumptively correct but allow challenges if proper legal proof is provided. Many petitioners face rejection when they fail to demonstrate ownership rights through valid documents or when mutations are not properly recorded. The process involves careful legal compliance, and courts tend to uphold revenue officials' decisions if procedural requirements are met. Therefore, individuals seeking mutation must ensure legal clarity and proper documentation to successfully update revenue records.
References: - Amrawati VS Dy. Director of Consolidation - Allahabad - Maharaj Himmat Singh VS Union of India - Rajasthan - Ramcharan VS Damodar - Madhya Pradesh - ANJANA SAMJI CHELA VS ANJANA HIRJI AHIJI - Gujarat - E. K. M. G. Bakir Ali VS G. Sundarraj - Madras - SMT. JAIBUNNISA W/O. LATE SYED MOHAMMED SHA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - Karnataka - DIST. COLLECTOR, R. R. DIST. VS KADICHERLA NARSIMHA - Andhra Pradesh - PRAFULLABA VANRAJSINH JADEJA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat - SHRI. BALASAHEB S/O. PARASHURAM SHEDAKE vs SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O. GUNDU SHARABIDRI - Karnataka - SHRI. BALASAHEB S/O. PARASHURAM SHEDAKE vs SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O. GUNDU SHARABIDRI - Karnataka
Search Results for "Tried to Get Mutated their Names in Revenue"
2015 0 Supreme(All) 2554 • India - Allahabad
RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
It also highlighted the need for a legal basis for entries in the revenue record and the authority of the Tahsildar to make changes ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that entries in the revenue record should be accepted at face value, but can be challenged ... Issues: The issues revolved around the recording of names over the disputed land, the genuineness of the entry in khatauni ... After death of Mewa his widow and the alleged daughters never tried to get their names #HL_S....
2005 0 Supreme(Raj) 1585 • India - Rajasthan
P.C.TATIA
in lieu of land acquisitioned under Sec. 23(1) of the Act of 1971 – Collector rejected for want of entey of petitioners name in revenue ... The petitioners tried to get their names mutated in the revenue record but that prayer of the petitioners was rejected and against that order of rejection of mutation, the petitioners did not choose to prefer any appeal. ... (11). ... According to learned counsel for the respondents, since the petitioners name is not entered into the reve....
2017 0 Supreme(MP) 565 • India - Madhya Pradesh
ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA
Code, 1959 (M.P.) -- S.117 -- entries in revenue record -- presumption of -- name of purchaser recorded as Bhumiswami -- Bhuadhikar ... ¼4½ ,e ih ,y ts 57 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 15] 17 ,oa 18½ ... (1) Land Revenue ... Therefore, it appears that neither Sahdev nor plaintiff had ever tried to get the disputed land mutated on their names, nor they had raised any objection against recording of name of Purushottam in revenue records as Bhumiswami. ... After death of Purushottam ....
2000 0 Supreme(Guj) 522 • India - Gujarat
M.S.PARIKH
They in the process tried to get their names mutated in the record of rights. The plaintiffs resisted such an action on the part of the said defendants as per the particulars set out in the plaint. ... 12) Whether the defendants prove that as result of their confirmed status as deemed purchaser of the said land and after due enquiry as to the alleged Will their names have been validly entered as Kabjedar in the Government revenue records as alleged in para 15 of the written statement? ....
2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 2838 • India - Madras
G.RAJASURIA
in 1993 - A tenant is expected to pay rent to landlord and in case of refusal or dispute regarding rents he has to deposit with revenue ... in registered as to particular kind of crop cultivated for years as against turmeric mentioned in 1993 - Failure of plaintiff to get ... The plaintiffs while vociferously finding fault with the defendants for having not taken steps to get mutated the revenue records, have forgotten as to why they had not taken such steps to get incorporated their #....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31784 • India - Karnataka High Court
MR N S SANJAY GOWDA, J
(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Mutation of revenue records - Review of order directing mutation in favor of petitioners ... petitions filed by Jaibunnisa and others dismissed; the order of the Deputy Commissioner upheld regarding the restoration of previous revenue ... As already noticed above, Jaibunnisa made a claim to get her name mutated in the revenue record on the basis of the order of the Land Tribunal passed in favour of her husband in the year 2002, only 20 years thereafter.....
2000 0 Supreme(AP) 801 • India - Andhra Pradesh
their names as pattadars is inappropriate - Against the orders passed by the Mandal revenue Officer refusing to mutate their names ... mutation of their names in the revenue records as pattadars and issue of supplementary Sethwar - Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners ... filed the above writ petitions to set aside the rejection order and direct the respondents to mutate their names in respect of the ... Under Sec. 4 of the ROR Act, they are entitl....
2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 619 • India - Gujarat
N.V.ANJARIA
Civil Laws – Challenge in this petition is directed against order passed in Revision Application by Secretary, Revenue ... Application preferred by petitioner, consequentially confirmed order of the Collector – Held, Clear error could be booked in orders of revenue ... He also tried to submit notice under Section 135-D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code was not certified upon the heirs. ... ... 3.2 Outlining further facts which attend the controversy, the original owner of the property was one Vajesang Ishwarji who appeare....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31824 • India - Karnataka High Court
MR. UMESH M ADIGA, J
However, there are no material on record to show that the Will was acted upon or that the revenue records were mutated in the name of plaintiff. ... During the year 2022, defendant Nos.1 and 2 filed an application to mutate the revenue records in their names and accordingly their names were entered in the revenue records. The plaintiff filed an application for cancellation of the said entry. ... Learned counsel for the appellant contends that even defendant Nos.1 to 3....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31180 • India - Karnataka High Court
MR. UMESH M ADIGA, J
However, there are no material on record to show that the Will was acted upon or that the revenue records were mutated in the name of plaintiff. ... During the year 2022, defendant Nos.1 and 2 filed an application to mutate the revenue records in their names and accordingly their names were entered in the revenue records. The plaintiff filed an application for cancellation of the said entry. ... Learned counsel for the appellant contends that even defendant Nos.1 to 3....
Filter by Legal Phrase
