AI Overview

AI Overview...

Summary of Cases Regarding Different Date of Birth Statements and Victim Judgments in Supreme Court Cases

1. Discrepancy in Victim’s Date of Birth Statements

2. Victim’s Testimony and Court’s Approach

3. Judgments and Legal Principles


References: - Patiram VS State of Maharashtra - Crimes, RAKESH KUMAR VS STATE - Delhi, VINU KARMASHI RADADIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Pinku Ray Bongaigaon VS State Of Assam - Gauhati, State Of Himachal Pradesh VS Balbir Singh - Himachal Pradesh, Kiran Karki @ Chettri Uncle, S/o. Late Purna Bahadur Karki VS State of Sikkim - Sikkim, Tikeshwar Dahariya vs State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. - Kasdol - Chhattisgarh, Vipin Kumar Jangde vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh, Mohd Ashraf Mir VS Cbi Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana

Search Results for "Two Different Date of Birth Statement Victim Judgement of Ble Supreme Court Case"

Patiram VS State of Maharashtra

India - Crimes

D.D.SINHA, S.T.KHARCHE

(i) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 164 - Magistrate is not expected to record statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. ... without Investigating Officer moving for it - If however such statement is recorded without it being moved by Investigating Officer ... Magistrate that appellant had assaulted dece-ased and thus statement of witness under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was an outcome of tutoring ... The victim must be made to feel that the court and the accused had taken care of him. Any such measu....

VINU KARMASHI RADADIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT

2006 0 Supreme(Guj) 574 India - Gujarat

A.M.KAPADIA, K.A.PUJ

In the case before Supreme Court, an unproved and school certificate was relied on Court took the view that there is no trust-worthy ... and one son wherein victim Ms. ... was away from the village while complainant was in the field and only the victim along with her sisters and brother were present ... She has further relied on the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Sudhanshu Shekhar Sahoo v. .......

Mohd Ashraf Mir VS Cbi Chandigarh

2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 1312 India - Punjab and Haryana

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

, 2003(8) SCC 364 , that to prevent social victimization orostarism of a victim of sexual offence, it would be appropriate that in judgment, by the Supreme Court, High Court or trial Court, name of victim should not be indicated. ... Later on, Bar Association also filed a PIL and aggrieved against an interim order, the CBI filed an SLP before the Hon 'ble Supreme Court. ... The Bar Association, filed an affidavit b....

Prakash S/o.  Dhansing Chavan VS State Of Maharashtra

2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 1748 India - Bombay

M.S.SONAK, PUSHPA V.GANEDIWALA

Fact of the Case: The victim, a minor, was repeatedly raped by her father, the appellant, resulting in two pregnancies ... Issues: The age of the victim and the paternity of the child born to the victim were the key issues in the case. ... The court also rejected the appellant's plea for the benefit of the doubt based on the victim's statement about her relationship ... These factors point towards a different approach required to....

RAKESH KUMAR VS STATE

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 1220 India - Delhi

O.P.DWIVEDI

; Sections 384 - Extortion — Evidence regarding the extortion of money from the brothers of victim ... abducting or inducing woman to compel her marriage — Extortion — Prosecutrix consenting party — When reliable evidence in proof of date ... of birth is not forth coming, the accused will be entitled to benefit of doubt — Accused could not have been held guilty of offence ... State of Maharashtra-AIR 1995 SC 2169, in similar circumstances, the Supreme Court observed as under:- ... IN her state....

State Of Himachal Pradesh VS Balbir Singh

2018 0 Supreme(HP) 1314 India - Himachal Pradesh

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA

Fact of the Case: The prosecutrix, a minor, was allegedly enticed away by the accused Praja Patti and taken to different ... The court emphasized that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses did not inspire confidence and the case did not fall under ... Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the findings of acquittal by the trial court were the result ... The Hon''ble Supreme Court in T.Subramanian vs. ....

Tikeshwar Dahariya vs State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. - Kasdol

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9474 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J

Key facts include testimony from the victim and supporting evidence from witnesses and FSL reports, establishing the credibility ... The judgment addresses the conviction under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, with the appellant sentenced to life imprisonment ... The court emphasized the reliability of a victim's testimony in sexual assault cases and upheld the trial court's conviction, affirming ... Shree Kant Shekar (2004) 8 SCC 153 the Hon‟ble Supreme Court held as follows:....

Kiran Karki @ Chettri Uncle, S/o.  Late Purna Bahadur Karki VS State of Sikkim

2019 0 Supreme(Sikk) 53 India - Sikkim

ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN

Fact of the Case: The victim, a minor, was found pregnant, leading to the criminal investigation and subsequent charges ... 376(2)(j), modifying the sentences under the POCSO Act, and maintaining the compensation awarded to the victim. ... The judgment highlighted the legal provisions of DNA profiling and its admissibility as evidence, emphasizing its role in proving ... The victim had also blamed Deepak Subba in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. (Exhibit-14) and no al....

Vipin Kumar Jangde vs State Of Chhattisgarh

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9556 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J

Facts of the Case: The victim, aged 16, was raped by the appellants on 18/11/2017. ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The lower court's conviction was upheld as the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt ... The court found ample evidence through witness testimonies and medical reports confirming the crime. ... Therefore, in the light of the principle propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment of Jarnail Singh (supra), o....

Pinku Ray Bongaigaon VS State Of Assam

2020 0 Supreme(Gau) 470 India - Gauhati

MANISH CHOUDHURY

Fact of the Case: The accused was convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act for sexually assaulting a minor. ... The judgment discussed the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and legal provisions related to the age of consent and presumption ... Finding of the Court: The court found the accused guilty based on the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and statutory ... In the instant case, the hymen of the victim was found torn at 5 o''clock position. It has been observed by th....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top