AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Unstamped cash receipts are typically inadmissible in court unless stamp duty is paid or specific legal exceptions apply. Proper stamping ensures the document's evidentiary value, and failure to do so can invalidate claims based on such receipts. Parties should ensure compliance with relevant stamp duty laws to uphold the validity of their cash-related documents.

Search Results for "Unstamped Cash Receipt"

Life Insurance Corporation of India VS State of Rajasthan

2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 145 India - Rajasthan

DALIP SINGH, S.S.KOTHARI

the receipt of the challan issued by the Receiving Officer for cash would be affixed to the instrument. ... under this Act may be paid to or collected by any Government treasury in cash and a receipt or challan therefore shall be duly given by the officer receiving the cash. ... vide receipt/challan No. ......... dated ............." ... The only exception is as provided under Section 3A which enables a person to pay the stamp duty in cash by depositing the ....

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS BANSIDHAR JALAN AND SONS.

1988 0 Supreme(Cal) 367 India - Calcutta

A.K.SENGUPTA, K.M.YUSUF

THE COURT ALSO NOTED THAT THE PAYMENTS WERE MADE IN CASH INSTEAD OF BY CROSSED CHEQUE OR CROSSED DRAFT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 40A ... THE COURT ALSO NOTED THAT THE PAYMENTS WERE MADE IN CASH INSTEAD OF BY CROSSED CHEQUE OR CROSSED DRAFT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 40A ... The assessee also produced an unstamped receipt issued by one Shri Kailash Prasad said to be the son of Shri Dhyawala. However, in the account books of Dhyawala and Co. the receipt of money from the assessee was entered on March 31, 1971. .....

Food Corporation of India, New Delhi VS Bhaskar Fertilizers, rep by its Managing Partner M.  Raja Bhaskara Rao

2012 0 Supreme(AP) 595 India - Andhra Pradesh

GODA RAGHURAM, NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Upon receipt of the said cheque, the managing partner has passed on an unstamped receipt dated 21.10.1983, Ex.A-32. Ex.A-32 is drawn on the letter head of the plaintiff firm. Per contra, Ex.B-7 is drawn on a plain paper. ... The defendants have stoutly disputed and denied to have coerced the plaintiff to pass on the receipt in a sum of Rs.1,24,371.46 ps and asset that the plaintiff has issued the necessary receipt on his own accord and out of his free will after receiving cash. ... Apa....

LAXMI NARAIN GUPTA VS SURAJ BHAN DARUKA

2000 0 Supreme(Del) 991 India - Delhi

K.S.GUPTA

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 37 — Leave to defend — Suit filed on the basis of cash receipt and hundi which has insufficiently ... stamped — Claim for interest without any stipulation in the receipt — defense cannot be termed as sham or moonshine — Leave to defend ... ... ( 3 ) SAID original receipt dated 6th March, 1986 is placed on Part in file. Admittedly, it is unstamped. ... A. 5495/89 seeking leave to defend suit on the grounds that Receipt dated 6th March, 1986 is inadmis....

S. K. GUPTA VS AVTAR SINGH BEDI

2005 0 Supreme(Del) 624 India - Delhi

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 16 — Agreement for purchase of property — Cash receipt of Rs. 1 lac executed by defendants ... admitting the receipt of Rs. 1 lac with the total consideration money being Rs. 25 lacs — Denial of execution of receipt — Dishonest ... defense by the defendant — Challenge to admissibility of receipt raised for the first time in argument held not maintainable — ... In said case, admissibility of the Hundi being unstamped was raised in the written....

Gopaldas VS Ramdeo

1956 0 Supreme(Raj) 188 India - Rajasthan

DAVE

(a) Stamps—Indian Stamps Act, sec. 2(22)—Promissory Note—Document reciting receipt of money with promise to pay. ... (b)—Negotiable Instruments Act, sec. 4—Document reciting receipt of money with promise to pay, held promissory note. ... The document in question, therefore, is not a receipt as urged by the petitioners learned counsel. The mere fact that the receipt of the money has been written first would not make it a mere receipt. ... The only question for determination before this Court is whether t....

Kiran Bansal VS T.  Chandra Kala

2015 0 Supreme(AP) 788 India - Andhra Pradesh

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

forbade the reception of secondary evidence Supreme Court observed that Section 36 only lifted that bar in the case of an original unstamped ... She alleged that the said amount was paid in cash which was acknowledged by a receipt executed by the respondents but the original receipt given to her was lost on account of shifting of her residence in April 2013. ... He also contended that since the very receipt of the sum of Rs.9,60,000/- is denied, there is no question of respondents issuing any ....

A.  Mohammed Rasheed, son of Hajee Abdul Rahim VS A.  Mohamed Rasheed, son of Amjat Ibrahim

1965 0 Supreme(Mad) 476 India - Madras

M.NATESAN

) and Schedule 1, Article 1 - Test to determine document whether it is an acknowledgment falling under Article 1 of Schedule 1 -Unstamped ... document merely saying that signatory had received cash of Rs. 1,000- Admissibility in evidence on payment of penalty. ... If it is a receipt, it will fall under section 35, Proviso (b) of the Act, which runs thus: ... "Where any person from whom a stamped receipt could have been demanded, has given an unstamped receipt and such receipt....

S. Raghunatha Gounder VS Pattappa Gounder

2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 929 India - Madras

V.DHANAPALAN

Possession - Property Dispute - Indian Registration Act, 1908, Section 49, Section 17 - The court discussed the admissibility of an unstamped ... Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that an unstamped and unregistered document cannot be taken into account even for collateral ... Issues: The main issue was the admissibility of an unstamped and unregistered document for collateral purposes and the determination ... In the instant case, ex.B30-Koor Chit is an unstamped and unregistered document. ... The said Koor Chit marked ....

Balu Ram VS Dhangal Rum

1961 0 Supreme(HP) 8 India - Himachal Pradesh

C.B.CAPOOR

He admitted the execution of the pronote but denied having received the sum of Rs. 684/- in cash. ... A receipt Ex. P. B was also executed by the petitioner contemporaneously with the execution of the pronote. ... 2. The petitioner admitted the execution of the pronote but denied having received the sum of Rs. 684/- in cash. ... Section 36 would virtually be a dead letter if even on being admitted in evidence an insufficiently stamped or unstamped instrument cannot be acted upon and I am in respectful agreement with the ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top