Yogendra Singh Charan - No direct information or references available in the provided sources regarding Yogendra Singh Charan. The sources mainly pertain to various criminal cases, bail orders, witness behavior, and judgments related to different individuals and incidents. No specific reference
Criminal Proceedings and Bail Orders - Several sources discuss bail applications and orders for accused persons such as Jaswant Singh, Honey Kumar, Lavjot Singh, and Lalit Singh, highlighting judicial decisions granting bail despite challenges like witness non-appearance. For example, in FIR No. 22/2022 (01700063265) and others (01700066760, 01700066766), courts emphasized the importance of witness cooperation and upheld bail conditions. JASWANT SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, Lavjot Singh VS State - Rajasthan, Lalit Singh, S/o. Shaitan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan, Through PP - Rajasthan, Kailash Singh, S/o. Shaitan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor - Rajasthan
Witness Non-Appearance and Rights Violations - Multiple cases (01700066760, 01700066766) mention witnesses, including star witness Ravindra Singh, willfully abstaining from court appearances despite bailable warrants, which the courts noted as a violation of the accused’s right to life and liberty. This underscores issues related to witness cooperation in criminal trials. Lalit Singh, S/o. Shaitan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan, Through PP - Rajasthan, Kailash Singh, S/o. Shaitan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor - Rajasthan
Judicial Ratios and Case Law - The courts referenced Supreme Court judgments, notably Lata Singh vs. State of U.P., emphasizing that love marriages against parental wishes are protected by constitutional rights. This illustrates judicial recognition of personal liberty and marriage rights in specific cases. Amina VS State - Rajasthan
Acquittals and Appeals - In some cases, such as the one involving Bhanwar Singh, Mohan Lal Jat, and Rajendra Singh (01700070275), the revision petitions were dismissed, and certain acquittals were upheld, demonstrating the appellate courts' stance on the sufficiency of evidence and procedural aspects. The Supreme Court’s decision in Dilwar Singh was also referenced concerning restrictions on cognizance of offenses. Kesar Singh S/o Shri Gouru Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
Cases of Violence and Crime - Several sources detail incidents of violence, such as the assault on Gopal Singh (INDRAJ00000025416), where accused individuals, including Bhanwar Singh and others, allegedly beat the deceased, leading to criminal proceedings. These cases highlight the criminal justice system’s role in addressing violence. STATE Vs. PREMA RAM - Rajasthan
Evidence and Prosecution - The prosecution’s case often relies on statements, disclosures, and physical evidence like weapons or property damage, as seen in cases involving the procurement of contraband (INDRAJ00000039598) and property disputes (01720093381). Witness statements and forensic evidence are crucial in establishing guilt. Bhom Singh vs State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Madhu Singh, S/o. Sh. Sohan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
Summary:
The sources collectively depict various criminal cases involving bail judgments, witness cooperation issues, and judicial decisions emphasizing constitutional rights, evidence evaluation, and appellate rulings. While there is no direct information on Yogendra Singh Charan, the cases reflect the broader legal landscape concerning criminal justice procedures, witness behavior, and rights protection.
It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Jaswant Singh S/o Shri Karnail Singh and (2) Honey Kumar S/o Amreek Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R.
5. accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lavjot Singh S/o Gurudev Singh, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 22/2022 of Police Station Rayala, District
However, despite issuance of bailable warrants witnesses including star witness Ravindra Singh have willfully abstained themselves from appearing before the trial Court. ... The star witness Ravindra Singh was called by the trial Court on number of occasions but did not appear before it, such action of this witness violates the right to life and liberty of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment in the case of Lata Singh Vs. ... the petitioners who had performed a love marriage against the wishes of their parents, citing the judgment in the case of Lata Singh ... Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
This Court vide order dated 07.08.2024 passed in SBCRLMB No.10175/2024 has granted bail to co-accused Lalit Singh while observing as under :- “1. ... However, despite issuance of bailable warrants witnesses including star witness Ravindra Singh have willfully abstained themselves from appearing before the trial Court. ... The star witness Ravindra Singh was called by the trial Court on number of occasions but did not appear before it, such action of this witness violates the right to life and liberty of the petitioner. ... Lalit #HL_START....
Hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed qua petitioners No. 2 Bhanwar Singh S/o Prabhu Singh, petitioner No. 3 Mohan Lal Jat S/o Kana Ram and petitioner No. 4 Rajendra Singh S/o Kesar Singh. 5. ... The Hon’ble Apex Court in Dilwar Singh Vs. ... and set aside qua petitioner no. 1-Kesar Singh. ... Pervinder Singh @ Iqbal Singh & Anr. (2005) 12 SCC 709 while observing that the section restricts the Court’s ability to take cognizance of offens....
... Facts of the case: ... The appellant-State challenged the acquittal of accused-respondents charged with the murder of Gopal Singh ... Thereupon, Bhanwar Singh alongwith Ugam Singh and Roop Singh rushed towards the place of incident and found Gopal Singh lying on the ground and the accused-respondents armed with the aforesaid weapons were beating Gopal Singh. ... , in the field of Poonam Singh, were subjecting his uncle Gopal Singh (deceased) to ....
The prosecution primarily relies upon the interrogation and disclosure statement of co-accused Tejmal Singh, recorded through Exhibit P-17, which purportedly supports the prosecution’s case regarding procurement of the contraband by Tejmal Singh from another accused, namely Papsa @ Prashant Singh.
It is argued that the deceased in his statement has specifically stated that he was upset/troubled as accused Samandar Singh, Babu Singh Tanwar, Sarpanch, Ramdeora and Jhabar Singh, Madhu Singh, Aam Singh, Derawar Singh and Dilip Singh came to his Dhani and broke the Tank. ... An FIR No. 65/2020 came to be registered on the basis of Parcha bayan of Girdhari lal S/o Pratapa Ram in which he stated that on 13.09.2020, Samandar Singh, Babu Sing....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.