S. B. SINHA, A. R. LAKSHMANAN
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti – Appellant
Versus
Pillibhit Patnagar Beej LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.-The unsuccessful respondents 2, 3 and 4 before the High Court of Allahabad are the appellants in this appeal. The writ petition was filed by the first respondent herein to quash the order dated 12.03.1999 (Annexure 17 to the writ petition) and for mandamus restraining the appellants herein from interfering in the business in certified seeds either before or after processing and further in restraining the appellants from demanding and realising market fee on the transaction of unprocessed or processed certified seeds.
2. A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court allowed the writ petition following the decision of this Court in State of Rajasthan vs. Rajasthan Agriculture Input Dealers Association reported in AIR 1996 SC 2179 which has also been followed by the Division Bench of the said Court in Writ Petition No. 7262 of 1993 dated 18.12.1996. The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 12.03.1999 and also held that the respondents in the writ petition/appellants herein cannot charge mandi fee on the seeds in which the first respondent herein deals. Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court in Civil (M) No. 17877 of 1999 dated 25.08.1999, a Sp
State of Maharashtra v. Indian Medical Association & Ors.
S. Samuel, M.D., Harrisons Malayalam & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
State of Rajasthan v. Mangi Lal Pindwal
State of Andhra Pradesh v. M/s. H. Abdul Bakhi & Bros.
Sri Krishna Coconut Co. v. East Godavari Coconut and Tobacco Market Committee
State of Rajasthan v. Rajasthan Agricultural Input Dealers Association
M/s. Khemka & Co. (Agencies) Pvt. Ltd. etc. v. State of Maharashtra etc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.