SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 6

C. A. VAIDIALINGAM, J. C. SHAH, K. SUBBA RAO, S. M. SIKRI, V. RAMASWAMI
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Madan Mohan Nagar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.JHA, C.B.AGARWAL, J.P.GOYAL, O.P.RANA, S.V.Gupta,

Judgement

SIKRI, J. : The respondent, Shri Madam Mohan Nagar, filed a writ Petition in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad for quashing the order of compulsory retirement, dated July 28, 1960 , passed against him. The order of compulsory retirement was in the following terms :

"I am directed to say that the Governor has been pleased to order in the public interest under Art. 465-A and Note (1) thereof of the Civil Service Regulations, the compulsory retirement with effect from September 1, 1960 of Sri Madan Mohan Nagar, Director State Museum, Lucknow, who Completed 52 years of age on July 1, 1960, and 28 years and 3 months of qualifying service on 31st May 1960, as he has outlived his utility."

2. The learned Single Judge who heard the Petition quashed the order on the ground that "Rule 465 of the Civil Service regulations as amended by the U. P. Government while providing a criterion for the guidance of Government when inflicting compulsory retirement on a Government servant nevertheless violates the guarantee of equality of opportunity in matters relating to employment under Art. 16 (1)" of the Constitution. He further held that the order inflicting, compulsory retirement on t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top