SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 489

Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, A. P. SEN, D. A. DESAI
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Jairam – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K.BHATTACHARJI, SHAKEEL AHMAD SYED, SHAUKAT HUSSAIN

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :—Heard counsel. Special leave granted.

2. The respondents, who are detained under the provisions of the "Prevention of blackmarketing and Maintenance of Essential Commodities Act, 1930 filed Habeas Corpus petitions in the High Court of Allahabad challenging the orders of detention passed against them. Those petitions were almost fully heard by a Division Bench on Oct, 19 and 22, 1981. The learned Judges, however, released the writ petitions from their list since the Court. had Diwali holidays from October 24 until November 2, 1981 and they were not likely to be available, perhaps as a Bench, for concluding the hearing of the writ petitions.

3. Another Division Bench took up the Writ Petitions for hearing on October 23 but they adjourned the petitions until the reopening of the Court on November 3, Soon after the Division Bench rose, counsel for the respondents approached a learned single Judge after Court hours and applied for bail. It appears that the Deputy Government Advocate was available. He was sent for and after hearing both the sides, the learned Judge granted bail to the respondents on the ground that the State Government had erred in forwarding t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top